
By Johnny Liberty
Founding of the United Nations
The United Nations (UN) was founded on October 24, 1945 in the aftermath of World War II. The UN was the substitute for the League of Nations which failed on its first attempt to create one-world government after World War I. Today, there are 193 member states of the United Nations (UN). All participate in the United Nations General Assembly.
There are five permanent member states: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly.
Compare the United Nations “Charter of Rights” with the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” as author and educator G. Edward Griffin did. You will notice a profound difference. Whereas the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” grants human rights “except where prohibited by law”, the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” limits and prohibits the federal U.S. government corporation from infringing upon the inherent sovereign “unalienable rights” of its sovereign “state” Citizens and U.S. citizens.
This demonstrates the profound distinction between “human rights”, or “civil rights”, and “unalienable rights”. One does not acknowledge individual “sovereignty” and the other does.
If you look back at the Congressional Record, you will discover that “United States” participation in the United Nations (UN) was never lawfully ratified by the U.S. Congress, even though the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” was approved in 1945. All member states of the United Nations (UN) must surrender a portion of their inherent national sovereignty to participate. The UN Security Council coordinates military/peacekeeping operations of its member states along with the Agency for International Development. Given the state of the world, we are not certain how much “peacekeeping” has actually occurred since its inception.
After the COVID-19 “plandemic”, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed to its member states signing on to an international treaty to appoint WHO as the global agency in charge of all future “plandemic” responses worldwide. Considering WHO’s ineptness and dishonesty in dealing with the COVID-19 “plandemic” from 2020 – 2022, not to mention persistently lying to the public to protect China’s interests, this is a ludicrous and dangerous idea.
During his term in office as U.S. President, Donald Trump addressed the United Nations (UN) with his “America First” policy, which is a policy whereby each member state should put their own people and their own “sovereignty” above that of the globalists.
If every nation was indeed “sovereign”, there would be less problems to deal with globally. But one-world government is not about solving problems or improving the quality of life for the people of the world. One-world government is about power, unelected power, top-down power ruling us all from the very apex of the pyramid.
For the first time in decades, a sitting U.S. President advocated for a strong policy of “national sovereignty” for every nation in the world during his annual speech to the United Nations (UN). He was met with laughter and ridicule by most of the member states. That says it all.
Sovereign Nations Need Not Apply
Sovereign nations such as “Taiwan” will not be admitted to the United Nations (UN) because China, who is a powerful member of the Security Council, is opposed to the idea. China still claims that “Taiwan” is a rogue state and is a “territory” of China. That is despite the fact that “Taiwan” was settled by “freedom fighters” who escaped mainland China during the Red Revolution.
“Taiwan” has not been admitted to the United Nations because China still lays claim to “Taiwan” as it did with Tibet before the Chinese invaded, took over Tibet and booted out the Dalai Lama. China is more eager than ever to reclaim “Taiwan” as part of China, but it will take a messy war to accomplish it.
“Taiwan” is also not bankrupt to the international bankers or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and/or World Bank (WB). As a rule of thumb, only indebted and perpetually bankrupt nations need apply to the United Nations (UN).
There are a few “gold-backed” exceptions to this rule, such as digital or blockchain currencies in the United States, Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Indonesia, China and Russia. Russia is debt-free to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and has one of the lowest debt to GDP ratios in the world.
One principle of “national sovereignty” is that only one sovereign nation state can occupy the same geography at the same time. Thousands of unrecognized indigenous nations exist who are not eligible for United Nations (UN) membership, because they are within the boundaries of other member nations.
Before the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) central banking system in the “United States”, the government created the post office and national banks without interference or intrusion by the international banks. Debt-free nations can create and print their own money internally instead of relying on the Rothschilds/Rockefeller central banking system. Debt-free nations are economically sustainable without any need of foreign borrowing with interest.
United Nations Global Governance Commission
The United Nations Commission on Global Governance called for a World Conference on Global Governance (1998). The purpose of the conference was to adopt treaties and agreements that would pave the way for one-world government before the year 2030.
The official United Nations (UN) motive for global government is the establishment of justice, human rights and economic equity worldwide. Social and economic justice, the theory goes, can only happen when all of humankind is equalized with an idea such as “Universal Basic Income (UBI)”. That sounds like a very socialist/communist idea.
Apparently, Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF) suggested that by 2030 the mass of humanity will “own nothing, but be happy.” This is part of their grandiose notion of a “Great Reset”.The authors of this book politely disagree and do not concur with Schwab’s assessment.
The United Nations Commission on Global Governance assumed that people will be ready by 2030 to accept a new “global ethic”. But they said that “people of the land” may have to overcome the primal instinct of wanting to own either private or community property. Those who buck the United Nation’s plans will be “reeducated”through the use of international law backed with military force.
The United Nations Commission on Global Governance says, “Global taxation is necessary to service the needs of the global neighborhood. The safeguarding of the global commons cannot be achieved with the current drip-feed approach to financing.”
A United Nations Global Transaction Tax, among other world tax schemes, was proposed to fund an expansion of the United Nations. Many other funding proposals have been made. During COVID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a 10% of GDP global tax from every member state to fight the “plandemic”. Most of these proposals have failed to pass as all have been challenged on the basis of “national sovereignty”.
The Global Commission to Fund the United Nations revealed that today’s present financial constraints on United Nations (UN) activities require a change in financing methods for the world body. They assert it’s now time to “shift the burden of financing the UN from national to global sources by introducing charges for the use of the global commons, for example, the Internet, or levies on international activities such as foreign currency transactions.”
United Nations Flow Chart and Treaties
- United Nations Charter (UN)
- UN Budget (2021)
- UN Security Council
- UN Treaties
- UN Arms Treaty
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
- UNEP (United Nations Environment Program)
- World Health Organization
- UNICEF
- Agency for International Development
- World Bank (WB)
United States Support for United Nations
The Clinton Administration supported the United Nation’s (UN) program enthusiastically. For instance, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, wrote an article for Time magazine called The Birth of the Global Nation, and he won the Global Governance Award from the World Federalist Association (1993).
U.S. President Clinton supported the UN’s agenda with his Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25), a declassified document. A summary revealed the “Creation by the UN of a Plans Division, an Information and Research Division, an Operations Division, a Logistical Division, A Public Affairs Cell, a Civil Police Cell and a Professional Peace Operations Training Program.”
The United Nations (UN) needed and needs to maintain a rapidly deployable headquarters team and modest airlift capabilities. The Clinton administration claimed that Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25) gives the U.S. President authority to assign U.S. military personnel to the United Nations for “peacekeeping” missions in Somalia and other places.
The George W. Bush Administration did not support the United Nations (UN) as enthusiastically as did Clinton. He took a radical departure toward unilateral action by the “United States” with no regard to the international community. “The audacity of Bush’s Iraq war maneuvers and his crude bullying threatens not only the United Nations, but the dream of world governance and world peace…Bush returned international relations to the raw power politics of the nineteenth century and abandons international law for the law of the jungle.”
The Obama Administration did much the same as Bush and Clinton. Since the United Nations (UN) is based in New York City, on land donated by the Rockefellers. The primary funder of the United Nations (UN) is the “United States”. Due in part to the UN’s ineptness, the Trump Administration cut funding for the United Nations (UN) suggesting that other member states make larger contributions.
References:
- United Nations Security Council | Five permanent members and ten elected every two years.
- Wikipedia | Freedom Force International | G. Edward Griffin compares the United Nations Charter with the U.S. Constitution | Cato Institute | Comparing EU Constitution with U.S. Constitution.
- White House Archives | Donald Trump addressing the United Nations (UN) on his “America First” policy.
- Wikipedia | Taiwan is still on the gold-standard.
- Citation Needed | Six countries not part of the World Bank Group are as follows: Cuba, North Korea, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and Nauru. Taiwan has the largest economy outside the World Bank. The two observer states, Vatican City as well as the State of Palestine, are also non-members.
- SCMP | China’s local government debt a concern?; Wikipedia | List of nations with external debt; As an interesting footnote China’s National Audit Office said that local government obligations hit 45 trillion yuan ($7 trillion USD) by the end of 2020 — a dramatic increase from the 10.7 trillion yuan figure reported in 2010; In fact China’s listed debt is internal, not external.
- Wikipedia | List of Countries by External Debt.
- Stanford Basic Income Lab | Universal Basic Income.
- World Economic Forum | Great Reset.
- Wikipedia | Proposed world tax schemes.
- Wikipedia | UN Charter.
- UN News | UN Budget 2021; The annual UN budget is slightly more than $3 billion USD.
- Wikipedia | UN Security Council www.un.org/en/sc/
- Wikipedia | UN Treaties (and all other treaties with the U.S.).
- Wikipedia | UNESCO www.unesco.org/new/en.
- Wikipedia | UNEP www.unep.org
- Wikipedia | World Health Organization www.who.int/en
- Wikipedia | UNICEF www.unicef.org
- Wikipedia | US Agency for International Development www.usaid.gov
- Wikipedia | World Bank www.worldbank.org
- Sourced from Multiple Land Use Review, March/April 1996; Citation Needed | Treason in High Places by William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, pp.239-249 (comments on the United Nations Treaty, the United Nations Participation Act V. the sovereignty of the United States of America); Amazon | Wikipedia | Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25; PDD-25 was intended to prevent the United States from using UN peacekeeping operations as the centerpiece of its foreign policy.
- Progressive Magazine | Bush Trashes the UN.
- Independent | Donald Trump to sign executive order to dramatically reduce funding of UN.
Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.137 – 141
ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!
Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!
$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK
Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!
$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK
