09. Short History of the Income Tax | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 19, 2025January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) requires “withholding” from employee’s income as an economic mechanism to mitigate the damage from spiraling inflation, while concealing currency devaluation. In addition “withholding” keeps your hard-earned Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) out of circulation so you cannot spend them as disposable income. The contemporary “income tax” system, as bizarre as it is, is an essential component of the Western debt-based central banking system.

By keeping Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) out of circulation through “withholding”, economic controls are more effective. By maintaining employee net income as near to subsistence as possible, the Citizen is effectively prevented from engaging in meaningful political activity to threaten the global elite’s monopoly over the political, economic and legal systems.

First Income Tax for Federal Employees

During the American Civil War, the first version of an “income tax” was implemented for federal U.S. government employees only, and once again after the corporate income tax was repealed. The U.S. Congress have been taxing the incomes of federal U.S. government employees since 1861.

Second Income Tax for Corporations

The second version on the income tax was a corporate tax introduced concurrently with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to off-set the debt incurred by the federal U.S. government corporation to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). This was yet another attempt to impose a direct tax on wages.

The U.S. Congress authorized a “voluntary” income tax in 1913 for corporate “persons”, under the very popular guise of “soaking the rich for the sake of the poor”. The income tax for corporations was promulgated simultaneously with the alleged ratification of the 16th Amendment. It was repealed by the Internal Revenue Act (Nov. 23, 1921).

At this juncture, a surtax on individuals was implemented to offset the corporate income tax. These taxes, which became known as income taxes via the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, were issued against the government returns for public officials.

Income Tax Goes Directly to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)

Before online banking and electronic fund transfers, we wrote paper checks to pay bills and our “income taxes”. If you noticed the stamp on the back of your cashed check from the IRS, you would have noticed that your check payment was endorsed by the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), not the U.S. Treasury or the IRS.

As we stated previously, the Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984) concluded that not one dime of your hard-earned tax money goes to pay for government services. All “income tax” payments service the interest only on the federal/national “debt (Ø)”.

All “income tax” collected goes to service an un-payable federal/national “debt (Ø)”, and is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated upon the We the People.

Since we have already asserted that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) via the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) is a primary principal/creditor of the federal U.S. government corporation, any “income tax” received would be directly routed to the principal-creditor – just like any other bankrupt entity. This is additional prima facie evidence of the bankruptcy of the federal U.S. government corporation.

“The greatest challenge our tax system faces in the 1990s is to ease the burden on taxpayers. Once people conclude that it is too difficult, too time consuming, too expensive to comply, many will stop complying.”
~ Fred Goldberg, IRS Commissioner

Apportionment as Rule of Law

The IRS has no lawful or delegated authority to assess and collect income taxes. The original U.S. Constitution strictly forbade the federal U.S. government from imposing any “direct” tax upon individuals.

The U.S. Congress could, however apportion direct taxes to a state, but not to the individuals within the state. A capitation means a “head tax”, “poll tax”, “per capita tax” or direct “income tax”, and is not permitted, unless equally apportioned to each state. This is the apportionment rule of law.

“No capitation, or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census
or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.”
~ U.S. Constitution [1:9:4]

“Representatives and direct taxes shall be
apportioned among the several States
which may be included within the Union
to their respective members…”
~ U.S. Constitution [1:2:3]

These original sections of the U.S. Constitution have never been repealed or lawfully amended, and the 16th Amendment, as passed, is invalid. The U.S. Constitution still today forbids direct taxation of individuals.

“Any direct tax that is not apportioned is unlawful.”
~ Commissioner v. Obear-Nester, 349 U.S.948 (1954)

Our Founders intentionally limited the taxing powers of the federal U.S. government so as to keep it small. “[the federal government] has no authority to raise either [men or money] by regulations extending to the individual [state] Citizens of America.”

Apportionment can be a protective shield against direct taxation for all sovereign “state” Citizens providing you are “domiciled” in one of the 48 sovereign states, and not a resident (or franchisee) of the federal United States.

16th Amendment Created No New Taxing Powers

The Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) claims the 16th Amendment gives them the constitutional authority to impose and collect direct taxes, despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the 16th Amendment created no new power of taxation, thus, did not amend or change the constitutional limitations forbidding direct taxation on individuals.

Additionally, as can be shown, the 16th Amendment (1913) was never lawfully ratified by the sovereign “states” of the Union.

16th Amendment Improperly Ratified

According to The Law That Never Was, authors Red Beckman and Bill Benson traveled to all the State Capitols to obtain certified copies of the official voting records of the thirty-six states that allegedly ratified the 16th Amendment.

By careful accounting, thirty-two states had committed grievous departures from acceptable procedure during the ratification process. In the official canvas of the first nineteen (19) Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. President’s signature is glaringly missing from the 16th Amendment. This is another story in a long history of frauds perpetrated upon We the People.

The real purpose for the 16th Amendment was to create a smoke screen, making it appear that constitutional restrictions on direct taxing had been abolished. But once the smoke had cleared, the Citizens would soon forget and the income tax would further encroach upon the assets and rights of the people who ever increasingly pay tribute to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and their foreign principals-creditors.

“The Congress shall have the power to lay
and collect taxes on incomes,
from whatever source derived, without
apportionment among the several states,
and without regard to any
census or enumeration.”
~ 16th Amendment

Third Income Tax For Appointed and Elected Government Officials Engaged in Business

The current Subtitle A tax and Subtitle C Social Security and related taxes have never applied to anyone other than appointed and elected government officials engaged in United States trade or business (defined at IRC §7701(a)(26)).

Victory Taxes After WWII

The U.S. Congress did not make the income tax “mandatory” until World War II, when a “victory tax” was imposed on “wages” as an “National Emergency” measure to help pay for the war. In contrast, both before and after World War II, “wages” were not subject to federal income taxes.

The U.S. Congress morphed the “victory tax” into the modern version of the “income tax” a few years after WWII to finance the Cold War debt, the rising military-industrial complex, and foreign-aid corporate programs to other developing countries.

No Direct Tax, Wages Are Not Income

Because many of the “citizens of the United States” weren’t paying attention after World War II, as many are today, We the People did not realize that the federal U.S. government could not constitutionally impose any direct “income tax” on their wages or property. They assumed that “wages” were income; thus, they volunteered to be taxed. Once again, Citizens swallowed a fraud and a hoax, and were left confused and holding the bag.

Several federal courts have ruled that states are prohibited from imposing an indirect tax upon an unalienable right (no sales tax on food items). Your right to work is an unalienable right and many states have right to work laws whereby the government cannot license or tax your right to work in the profession of your choice.

According to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), “wages” are not taxable because they are not defined as “income”.

What is Taxable Income or Gain?

A lawful tax liability is created from an increase or gain in the value of property, not from gross income, providing you are a person required to file and report.

Where income from private enterprise is defined as property, it is generally exempt from direct tax under fundamental law. “Wages”, salary and other returns from public service are deemed to be privileged, commercial enterprises due to government-granted benefits, thus, are considered to be taxable. In other words, the “income tax” is nothing more than an excise tax levied against privileges and benefits derived from federal government service.

Income is Defined in the IRC in the Same Light as a Schedule C, Standard Business Calculation

David Myrland’s Our Uncle, Our Problem demonstrates that IRC § 7701(e) (contract for lease of property) relative to IRC §83 calculations (of the fair market value) and IRC §1011, 1012, 1014 (adjusted basis of property transferred) confirms this.

GROSS INCOME (minus) EXPENSES = INCOME (PROFIT or GAIN)
or INCREASE OF VALUE

In calculating “gross income”, 26 USC §83 applies to all compensation for services. §1.83-4(b)(2) requires that the cost of compensation for services is to be figured by applying the provisions of §1012 and the regulations hereunder.

Regarding 26 USC §83 calculations, ask these questions. Where, under §1012, is the exclusion of intangible personal property, such as labor, from property that is to be treated as a cost?

Which specific provisions exclude my compensation from the provisions of §83? How am I to comply with the provisions and requirements of §83?

As an independent contractor or employee, does §83 allow the taxation of the fair market value of services, received as a fee or wage?

Labor is Property, Not Taxable Income

If you are selling your labor to an employer, then labor is your property. Your labor is your property, therefore not taxable. If you are exchanging labor for a paycheck, then zero gain = zero tax. This is the same as if you are breaking even, not making a “profit”.

The same calculation applies for both cash or bartered exchanges. The entire income tax code has nothing to do whatsoever with “wages”, but “profit”, “gain” and “increase” in value.

NO INCOME = NO INCOME TAX
NO PROFIT = NO GAIN

As an “employee”, you are not even required to keep books and records.

“Compensation for labor (wages) cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit’ …means the gain made upon any business or investment – a different thing altogether from mere
compensation for labor (wages).” ~ Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992 (1955)

“[The IRS] taxes only income ‘derived’ from many different [U.S.] sources; one does not ‘derive income’ by rendering services and charging for them.”
~ Edwards v. Keith, 231 F.110

References:

Wikipedia | Internal Revenue Act of 1921, §213, pp.237 and 238; IRC of 1954, §3401(c), people identified as “employees” amended in 1986].
Cornell Law | United States v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 233, 56 S.Ct. 223, 80 L.Ed 233 (1935).
GovInfo | U.S. Government Manual, p.794, 1995/96 edition.
Wikipedia | Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984); Free At Last by N.A. Scott, Ph.D., D.D., pp.2-5; Family Guardian | Confirms the allegation that the income tax revenues go 100% to pay the interest on the national debt and not a single nickel of it goes to the government; Citizens Against Government Waste
Wikipedia | Fred Goldberg, IRS Commissioner.
Wikipedia | U.S. Constitution [1:9:4]; Limits on Federal Power.
Wikipedia | U.S. Constitution [1:2:3]; House of Representatives.
Court Listener | Commissioner v. Obear-Nester, 217 F.2d 56 (7th Cir 1954).
Founders Archives | The Federalist Paper #15 by Alexander Hamilton, Modern Library.
Justia | Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
The Law That Never Was | The Law That Never Was by Red Beckman and Bill Benson; Amazon; Senate Document 240. Regarding the supposed ownership of the IRS; Pandora’s Box by Alexander Christopher, p.523 (IRS is owned by R.E. Harrington Insurance Company of England which had its roots in the original Virginia Company that colonized the southern part of the USA) www.archive.org/details/PandorasBoxAlexChristopher1993
Cornell Law | 16^th Amendment, U.S. Constitution.
Javelin Press | Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party (Javelin Press, Austin, Texas, 1992) (income tax is for public employees).
Congressional Record | Congressional Record for March 27, 1943, p.2580.
Citation Needed | Our Uncle, Our Problem by David Myrland. regarding IRC §7701(e) (contract for lease of property) relative to IRC §83 calculations (of the fair market value) and IRC §§1011, 1012, 1014 (adjusted basis of property transferred).
Ibid.
Javelin Press | Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party (Javelin Press, Austin, Texas, 1992) (wages are not taxable as income).
Justia | Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992 (1955); People ex rel. Thomas B. Needles, Auditor, 90 Ill. 166. “Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit.” Laureldale Cemetery Association Matthews, 354 Pa. 239, 47 A.(2d) 277; The word “profit” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (3rd ed.) as “The advance in the price of goods sold beyond the cost of purchase. The gain made by the sale of produce or manufactures, after deducting the value of the labor, materials, rents, and all expenses, together with the interest of the capital employed.” There is a clear distinction between “profit” and “wages” or compensation for labor. “Compensation for labor can not be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit’, as ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or investment — a different thing altogether from mere compensation for labor.”
Case Law Vlex | Edwards v. Keith, 231 F.110 (2nd Cir 1916).

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.85 – 90

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

09. Individual Master File (IMF) | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 19, 2025January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

As if this bizarre scheme to collect taxes is not convoluted enough, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS), apparently limited is in its legitimate ability to tax Citizens directly, has contrived an incredible scam of imposing excise taxes based not on income or gain, not with jurisdiction or delegation of authority, but due to a specific taxable activity beyond the scope of the U.S. Constitution, such as: “operating an offshore oil well, importing drugs from the Cayman Islands, or dealing in gasoline used in school buses”.

We admit this conclusion seems far-fetched, virtually impossible to believe, but there appears to be evidence to support this presumption. Imagine that in order to impose excise taxes directly on Citizens, the IRS has been intentionally mis-classifying 95% of all taxpayers as involved in some excise taxable activity light-years removed from any sense of reality.

Ludicrous, as it may seem, the Individual Master File (IMF), or Business Master File (BMF), of each individual or business taxpayer has a series of “industry activity codes”. If decoded they reveal excise taxable activity that creates a false liability to pay excise taxes. Simply stated, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) has systematically falsified the file of every taxpayer “U.S. citizen” to create a basis for tax liability.

The IRS is primarily a record management agency. Every administrative action taken by the IRS is designed to settle the record in favor of assessment and collection.

As a remedy for frustrated taxpayers, addressing the falsehoods in the IMF or BMF with a request to correct the record may stop the assessment and collection activity altogether. Request a complete copy of your IMF and the corresponding decoding book may be a valuable tax reduction strategy.

IRS Classifies Some Taxpayers Narcotics Dealers

“When Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have been filed for an Individual Master File (IMF) for people who are experiencing tax problems with the IRS, every return has been found to contain the above codes except for some which are coded as ‘Guam’ returns. Every return shows that the unsuspecting Citizen is being taxed on income derived from importing narcotics, alcohol, tobacco, or firearms into the United States, or one of its territories or possessions, from a foreign country or from Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or into the Virgin Islands from the Cayman Islands.”

IRS Venue and Statute of Limitations

There are no regulations published in the Federal Register which extend Internal Revenue Code (IRC) authority to the state republics for establishing federal internal revenue districts (26 USC §7621).

There is no regulatory authority extending jurisdiction of the Department of the Treasury to the state republics (26 USC §7801). There are no regulations extending authority of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the state republics and the population at large (26 USC §7802).

Tom Dunn of Maine claims to have documented that judges of the “United States” participate in this international scam by way of the Capital Trust Corporation in the District of Columbia (D.C.), by way of an offshore trust linked with the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS).

If the international connection can be shown, the assertion that the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) collects for an undisclosed foreign principal/creditor can be proven, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) represents an undisclosed, foreign “Central Authority”, which appears to be an international long-arm of the hidden Global Power structure.

The general authority statute for the Department of Justice (DOJ) is 28 USC §516. In U.S. v. Mattison, C.A. 9 (Mont.) 1979, 600 F.2d 1295, the court stated that 28 USC §516 was a general housekeeping statute and that the authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) must be prescribed by a statute specific to an offense.

IRS Tax Protester Types

Here are a few IRS classifications of tax protesters which they claim use “frivolous tax arguments”:

(1) A tax protester is a person who employs one or more illegal schemes that affect the payment of taxes.

(2) The following are schemes used by illegal tax protesters:

(a) Constitutional basis.

(b) Fair Market Value.

(d) Blank IRS Form 1040/1040A.

(e) Non-Payment Protest.

(f) Protest Adjust.

(g) Mail Order Ministries.

(h) Protester Letters and Cards.

(i) Family Estate Trust.

The trusts are filed on IRS Form 1041. Terms such as “family”, “pure”, “prime”, and “constitutional” are used in the title of the trust. Income is from “wages”or “contract”sources and deductions are for personal living expenses, such as housing, medical, auto, child care, interest or taxes. Generally, an individual will establish a trust and give his-her wages or other income to the trust. Then the trust pays for the expenses of the individual. The expenses claimed as administrative expenses of the trust, result in the individual paying no tax and the trust paying little or no tax.

Individual Income Tax as Excise Tax

The individual “income tax” prescribed in Subtitle A of the Internal Re-Venue Code (IRC) is an excise tax levied for the privilege of working for the federal government. The tax is mandatory only for officers, agents and employees of the United States agencies, and officers of United States corporations (26 USC §3401(c)and(d). The tax is otherwise voluntary (26 USC §3402 (p).

Yet the IRS, with full cooperation of state and federal courts, United States attorneys, and Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys routinely assails the “citizens of the United States” by way of administrative edicts, seizures, etc., and both civil and criminal prosecution.

The study of IRS generated Individual Master Files (IMF) demonstrates that many lawsuits for tax collection are premised on coding which classifies the alleged taxpayer as being involved in illegal drug trafficking via the Virgin Islands and/or other off-shore jurisdictions.

People expert in IRS document decoding may be among those presenting testimony to the grand jury.

“In order to avoid open hostilities,
it is necessary to move evidence into
proper legal forums so there can be
peaceful remedies that minimize
danger and damage.”
~ Dan Meador

References:

Wikipedia | Individual Master File (IMF); Archives | Request for Records Disposition Authority; The Matrix Has You | Individual Master File (IMF) Decoding by Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM); Family Guardian | Obtaining and Analyzing Your IMF; Family Guardian | 12 Deposition Questions; Legal Beagle | How to Access the IMF from the IRS?
Sourced from Veritas Magazine.
Cornell Law | 28 USC §516: Tax Refund Case www.law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/273/13/455842
Wikipedia | Tax Protester History; Family Guardian | IRS Tax Protester Handbook for Training Agents; Internal Re-Venue Service | IRS Frivolous Arguments.
Cornell Law | 26 USC §3401(c)and(d); Cornell Law | 26 USC §3402 ℗.
Quote by Dan Meador; Family Guardian | The Great Income Tax Hoax: Why We Don’t Owe Income Tax by Dan Meador, an excellent brief on the history of the Internal Re-Venue Service.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.83 – 85

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

08. Federal U.S. Government Corporation is Bankrupt | Bankruptcy | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 17, 2025January 18, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

“Mister Speaker. We are here now in Chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. government.”
~ James Traficant, Jr. (D-Ohio) addressing the House on Wednesday, March 17, 1993, U.S. Congressional Record, Volume #33, page H1303

Shifting from Statesmen to Politicians

Since the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, the federal U.S. government corporation has continued to this day to borrow and spend without limit or accountability. Trillions of “dollars (Ø)” are missing and are unaccounted for by the General Accounting Office (GAO). Executive Departments and U.S. government agencies have embezzled funds and refused to track where the “money (Ø)” authorized by the U.S. Congress was spent.

Historically speaking, power hungry, money-crazed, “elected representatives” in the U.S. Congress, the supposed guardians of the constitutional Republic, took only 20 years (1913 – 1933) to bankrupt the federal U.S. government corporation the first time. Then they “sold out” the united states of America to its foreign principals-creditors. This was the day when statesmen/stateswomen, who loved this country more than their own self-interest, became corrupt politicians instead.

In 1933, the federal U.S. government corporation declared bankruptcy for the first time by Presidential Proclamation (PP) #2039, issued March 6, 1933, and Presidential Proclamation (PP) #2040, issued March 9, 1933, which temporarily suspended all banking transactions by member banks of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). Normal banking functions were resumed on March 13, 1933 subject thereafter to new restrictions.

These Presidential Proclamations (PPs) took effect after U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared a “National Emergency” pursuant to Executive Orders (EOs) # 6073, 6102, 6111, and 6260 (see Senate Report 93-549, pp. 187, 594; 5 USCA§903) under Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, codified 12 USC 95a; HJR 192 of June 5, 1933; confirmed in Perry v. U.S. (1933), 294 U.S. 330-381 and 31 USC 5112, 5119.

THE FIRST OF MANY UNDECLARED U.S. BANKRUPTCIES

Foreclosure of U.S. Government Corporation

Without advance notice, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) effectively foreclosed on the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 1933 and demanded gold ($) to satisfy the interest payment on the debt obligations incurred since 1913. On June 5, 1933, the U.S. Congress enacted House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 to suspend the gold standard indefinitely.

“Whereas the holding or dealing in gold affects the public interest, and are therefore subject to proper regulation and restriction; and whereas the existing ‘national emergency’ has disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee (Federal Reserve Bank) a right to require payment in gold.”~ House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192

Suspension of Gold Standard and Confiscation

In 1933, the Department of the U.S. Treasury (U.S. Treasury Department today) was emptied of its gold, including all its gold in the legendary Fort Knox. The gold was immediately deposited in the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). Every state in the Union went bankrupt as well by pledging their good faith and credit (future productivity) to aid the federal U.S. government corporation.

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) directed U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to declare a “National Emergency” and prohibit the private ownership of gold ($) within the federal United States for U.S. citizens. U.S. citizens subjected to federal jurisdiction were ordered to deliver their gold immediately to the nearest Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) by Executive Order (EO). #6102

Although, by law, Executive Order (EO) #6102 applied only to U.S. citizens and federal government employees, other American National or sovereign “state” citizens complied (as they didn’t know any better) and handed over their real money ($) in exchange for a paper money substitute (Ø).

If you wonder why you do not have any real “money ($)”, it is because you are being robbed in broad daylight by the international “banksters” and the principals-creditors of the U.S. government corporation. Most people hardly even noticed back then until it was too late, and fewer still realize it is happening again today.

Incapable of Ever Paying Debt

Since House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192, the American people have not been capable of lawfully paying a debt. We can only exchange and transfer debt from one party to another which is what we do when we buy or sell real estate, products or services with Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs).

No debt personal or federal can ever be fully paid back. The federal/national debt and obligation to its creditors is perpetual, growing exponentially and lasting in perpetuity (until bankruptcy do us part and the federal U.S. government closes its doors forever).

“If we do not change our direction, we are likely to end up where we’re headed.” ~ Chinese Proverb

UN-PAYABLE DEBT

Profound Shift from Substantive Common Law

The indefinite suspension of the gold standard and prohibition against the payment of debts due to the fiat (fictitious) nature of the money supply, also altered the legal concept of “substance ($)” from the “Common law” jurisdiction. The profound impact of this is rarely considered. This shift from a “gold ($)” standard to a fiat “money (Ø)” supply shifted the very foundation of the entire American legal system.

Political, economic and legal systems are all interconnected and linked together. A shift in one, must then shift the context of the others with considerable effort and remarkably vast, stealthy, systemic coordination.

Under the “Common law” jurisdiction “money ($)”, for example, “gold ($)” or “silver ($)”, is lawful “substance ($)”or consideration, which was necessary for sealing a legal contract and transferring absolute “allodial” title to land. Each “Common law” contract was backed by lawful “substance (Ø)”which sealed any “Common law” contract with a minimum of $21.00 of silver, or lawful consideration.

After the first U.S. bankruptcy was declared in 1933, and the gold standard suspended indefinitely, this long standing foundation of “Common law” contracts was undermined and eventually replaced with
“statutory” contracts that were and are outside the bounds of the U.S. constitution.

Lawful “money ($)” was replaced with a National Public Credit System where debt money or Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs)(Ø) would be defined as “legal tender (Ø)” to “discharge (Ø)” debts instead of real “money ($)”, once again, “gold ($)” or “silver ($)”. By implication, “Common law” was also suspended along with the gold standard indefinitely, as there was no real “money ($)” left in circulation to execute any action in law. Thus, this first U.S. bankruptcy resulted in a coup d’etat of the political, economic and legal systems.

“Except in matters governed by the federal Constitution or by Acts of Congress,
the law to be applied in any case is the law of the state…there is no general federal Common law.”
~ Erie R.R. v. Thompkins, 304 US 64 (1938)

The idea of an “un-payable” debt, a “debt (Ø)” in perpetuity which can never be paid off, exists exclusively in the “Admiralty/Maritime”jurisdiction. This implies an international contract that compels specific performance.

The “principal/creditor” in the fashioning of this “federalized Common law” is the “Admiral”, a “Sovereign Power” enlarging their powers and jurisdiction over the constitutional Republic as a result of public policy declared in HJR 192. The limited liability for payment of perpetual debt falls under the “federal law merchant” and the law of Admiralty/Maritime because of the subject matter, and the nature of the cause of the action.

Thus, both the state and federal constitutions, and Common “law of the land”yielded to the “Admiralty/Maritime”, the “law of the sea”. The federal U.S. government corporation chose another “Sovereign Power” as their “Master”. Since that ill-fated day in 1933, the “Sovereign Power” has no longer been the people of the united states of America as was intended by the Founders.

The Admiral is King of the United States

The “Admiral”, and whoever or whatever entity they personify, is the new “King/Queen of the United States”. The national sovereignty of the “United States” has been effectively and invisibly transferred to the foreign principals/creditors of the federal U.S. government.

There have never been any constitutional provisions for this occurring. Nonetheless, this is exactly what has happened and is happening today. This is treason of the highest order, yet none of our leaders or “elected representatives” would dare to call it that (treason).

When the courageous U.S. Congressman Louis T. McFadden (R-PA) stood up to the mighty bankers and legislators in the 1930s, and brought impeachment charges against them, the indictments were buried in Committee and never came to the House floor for debate or consideration.

Later, McFadden was believed to have been poisoned for daring to tell the truth. Few of our “elected representatives” in Washington D.C. have dared tell the truth about the implications of the first U.S. bankruptcy of 1933.

In recent times, the outrageous, brave and courageous U.S. Congressman James Traficant, Jr. (D-Ohio) was indicted and imprisoned under false ethics charges for daring to address the U.S. Congress about the first U.S. bankruptcy in 1933, and numerous other bankruptcies since that fateful day.

The federal U.S. government corporation is perpetually “bankrupt (Ø)”. Our children will inherit this un-payable “debt (Ø)”, along with the tyranny to enforce it. Take an honest look around and tell me if this is not happening today.

CHALLENGE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK UNDER ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION

International Banksters

Many people not only lost their “gold ($)” in 1933, but were then paid only Ø.59 on the U.S. Dollar in worthless paper currency (Ø) when it was exchanged at the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB).

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld FDR’s radical policies due to his persistent threats to reorganize the judicial branch despite the Roosevelt Administration’s obvious unconstitutional acts. Under the Emergency Powers Act and Executive Authority of the U.S. President, the U.S. Constitution and the Common law were swept away with the stroke of a presidential pen. The “money trust” of the international bankers were firmly in charge.

The Banking Act of 1935 established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), booted out the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury and U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, then decreed that all profits of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) would be retained exclusively by the bankers.

If you did not realize this beforehand, you now know that the federal U.S. government corporation has been “bankrupt(Ø)”, financially, legally, judicially and morally ever since that fateful day.

Instead of making a necessary course correction of this grave constitutional error by repealing or amending the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 or challenging its constitutionality under the “Admiralty/Maritime” jurisdiction, despite a few courageous efforts to do so by U.S. Congressmen Ron Paul, the U.S. Congress has cowardly continued to allow this pyramid scheme, grand theft and property confiscation to occur without question or challenge.

Property confiscation has been accomplished through many methods including via excise and income taxes, social security taxes, probate and inheritance taxes; plus, inflationary monetary policies, devaluation of the paper currency, seizures, forfeitures, condemnations, malicious prosecutions and millions of bankruptcy proceedings.

Today, like in times past, the U.S. Congress continues to borrow, spend and squeeze until the people of the united states of American cry “Uncle”. Then, there is talk about “tightening the federal budget”, “balancing the budget”or “taxing the rich”, but then they go ahead, borrowing more and more.

Twice a year, the U.S. Congress must raise the debt ceiling and get permission from the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) to do so. They must bow to their “Master”, the “Admiral”, to beg, borrow and spend more taxpayer “money (Ø)”. Every time they accomplish this, more land, property, real estate, assets, industrial capacity, and freedom are handed over to the foreign principals-creditors.

Both political parties, Republicans and Democrats, have perpetrated this travesty to this very day with little or no opposition.

LOSS OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY

The True Cost is National Sovereignty

The true cost of funding the federal U.S. government corporation shopping spree for the exclusive profits of the private international banking cartel, all at public expense, has ultimately been the loss of national sovereignty for the “United States”, our lawful sovereign “state” Citizenship, the integrity of our political, economic and judicial systems and the complete loss of the U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights.

“I have never seen more senators express discontent with their jobs…I think the major cause is that, deep down in our hearts, we have been accomplices in doing something terrible and unforgivable to this
wonderful country. Deep down in our heart, we know that we have given our children a legacy of bankruptcy. We have defrauded our country to get ourselves elected.” ~ John Danforth (R-MO)

As a principle of law, whenever the federal U.S. government, or any corporation or government, or any legal “person” declares bankruptcy, its sovereignty is effectively transferred to its principals-creditors who then determine how to distribute the assets.

By implication, the U.S. bankruptcy is nothing less than an abrogation of national sovereignty. As a “bankrupt (Ø)” entity, the federal U.S. government corporation no longer has any lawful authority to initiate civil or criminal actions. No “bankrupt(Ø)” entity can issue credit or make loans. All U.S. government loans, benefits and grants are frauds on their face.

Thus, after the first U.S. bankruptcy the constitutional court system was suspended along with the constitutional money system, and replaced with military tribunals operating under “Admiralty/Maritime” law. These proceedings are disguised as “statutory” law in courtrooms under the occupation of the “gold-fringe” military flag of the United States.

Consequently, the power and authority of the federal U.S. government corporation resides in the sovereignty of its principals-creditors, aka Central Authority, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and its principals-creditors the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB).

All courts, federal, state and county, are effectively convened in “bankruptcy proceedings (Ø)” against United States “persons” and “citizens of the United States”. These proceedings are suing via the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in an “Admiralty/Maritime” jurisdiction.

References:

Wikipedia | James Traficant, Jr. (D-OH) addressing the House on Wednesday, March 17, 1993; United States Congressional Record, Volume #33, page H1303 and www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/peace_freedom/patriots_and_protesters/news.php?q=1240607530
Wikipedia and Cornell Law | Senate Report 93-459, pp. 187, 594 under Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, codified 12 USC §95a; House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933 suspended the gold standard; confirmed in Perry v. United States (1933), 294 US 330-381 and 31 USC §§5112, 5119; Velma Griggs; Freedom School The Original 13th Amendment, Inyawe Trust Company p.48 (Treasury of the US and every State went bankrupt); California Assembly and Senate adopted Joint Resolution Number 26.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Wikipedia | FDR Executive Order (EO). #6102.
An ancient Chinese Proverb.
Cornell Law | Erie RR. V. Thompkins, 304 US 64, changed American law from Common law to Negotiable Instruments Law.
Wikipedia | Limitation of Liability Act, 46 USC §183 (March 3, 1851).
Wikipedia | Louis T. McFadden; Americans Bulletin, Sep ’94 p.11 www.americansbulletin.com
Javelin Press | Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party (Javelin Press, Austin, Texas, 1992, pp.4/3-4/11).
Wikipedia | Banking Act of 1933, P.L. 73-66, 48 Stat. 162; Wikipedia | Gold Reserve Act of 1934.
Quote by John Danforth (R-MO) sourced from The Arizona Republic, interview on April 22, 1992.
Open Jurist | S. Central Authority, 42 USC §11606 www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=authorities.detailsandaid=279; ABC Legal www.abclegal.com/international-service-of-process; Hague Service www.hagueservice.net/forms/Official_Hague_Circular_Notice.pdf; International Monetary Fund www.imf.org/external/index.htm; World Bank www.worldbank.org
Government’s Liberty…Brings Death To Freedom, p.43 (Federal Reserve creditors are the sovereign powers).

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.47 – 52

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

07. Federal Reserve Banking System | Money | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 15, 2025January 20, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) was originally based on the Vatican’s Canon law, and the principles of sovereignty established by the Declaration of Independence and codified in the U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights.

Federal Reserve as Joint Stock Trust

In fact, the private international bankers used a “Canon Law Trust” as their model, adding private stock and renaming it as a Joint Stock Trust. Eric Madsen asserted that it was a type of corporation.

In 1873, the U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal “person”to create a Joint Stock Trust. The Federal Reserve was legislated post-facto to 1870, despite the fact that post-facto laws were strictly forbidden by the U.S. Constitution [1:9:3].

“This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes
the most gigantic trust on Earth.
When the President [Wilson] signs this bill
the invisible government of the Monetary Power will be legalized…
the worst legislative crime of the ages will be perpetrated by
this banking and currency bill.”
~ Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr. (1913)

To this day, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) remains a United States, European and Global Power structure separate and distinct from the federal U.S. government corporation operating entirely outside the bounds of the U.S. Constitution.

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) is a maritime lender and insurance underwriter to the federal U.S. government corporation, that operates exclusively under international “Admiralty/Maritime” law.

The maritime lender or insurance underwriter bears all the risks, and Admiralty/Maritime law compels specific performance by paying the annual interest due, or insurance premiums.

All the assets of the debtor nation state, such as the federal U.S. government corporation, can be “hypothecated”, in other words, pledged as security to pay the federal /national debt by the maritime lender or insurance underwriter. Alarmingly, all the assets of the people of the united states have been “hypothecated” against both present and future “debt (Ø)” that is to be paid one day whenever the note is called.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 stipulated that the interest on the federal/national debt was to be paid in gold not in “paper money substitutes (Ø)”. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act whatsoever for ever paying down the principle on the loan. Thus, an un-payable federal/national “debt (Ø)” was instituted from the inception of the Act. Indeed, this seems crazy, but it is true.

The Federal Reserve Act was never challenged in a U.S. court of competent jurisdiction which would be have been under “Admiralty/Maritime” law.

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) is a sovereign Joint Stock Trust fully independent of the federal U.S. government. It does not file a tax return or pay any “taxes”. It is not subject to Title 5, USC or to the scrutiny of the General Accounting Office (GAO). It had never filed statements of assets on any information form until recently kudos to former U.S. Congressmen Ron Paul (R-TX).

“Federal Reserve bonds, including the
capital stock and surplus therein
and the income there-from,
shall be exempt from federal, state and
local taxation, except taxes upon real estate.”
~ 12 USC 531

Not Federal and Nothing in Reserve

The name of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), in other words, the “FED”, is deceptive. There is nothing “federal” about the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) because it is not part of the federal U.S. government. In the Washington D.C. phone directories of yore, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) was never listed under U.S. government offices.

There is nothing held on “reserve” in the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). They project the appearance of being a “system” of regional offices to shift the appearance of power away from Wall Street, but essentially the power is centralized in the Board of Governors. They are not a “bank” because they do not deal with real, constitutional “money ($)”, but only “fiat (Ø)” money.

The stated mission of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) was to stabilize banking, but if one analyzes their track record, it has not achieved the stated objectives. It was never the objective of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) in the first place. Instead it was a deceptive ploy to get the legislation passed and signed by the U.S. President with a minimum of resistance from the people.

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) did, however, achieve the cessation of private capital formation in the hands of We the People by eliminating both the gold (1934) and silver (1968) standards for domestic currency, thus centralizing the power of capital formation in the hands of private international banking cartels.

“The main purpose for establishing
a central banking system in the United States
of America was to ultimately confiscate
100% of the property and assets
of the American people.”
~ Johnny Liberty

Passing the Federal Reserve Act

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed over a Christmas vacation on December 22, 1913 with merely ten legislative members in session. This was hardly a legal quorum for passing legislation by any stretch of the imagination.

Most of the U.S. Congress was adjourned for the Christmas holidays. Furthermore, “U.S. citizens”, sovereign “state” Citizens, Congress and the President had been fooled by a well-orchestrated propaganda and media campaign into believing that the private international bankers and the Wall Street “money trust” were opposed to the legislation.

Through clever political manipulation, propaganda and a knee-jerk reaction by the press, many of our leaders walked into a well-designed trap to support the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 despite its lack of legal quorum. U.S. President Woodrow Wilson signed the Act under considerable pressure and later regretted his signing the Act by saying. “I am a most unhappy man, unwittingly I have ruined my country.”

“The [Federal Reserve Act] as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency…I do not like to think that any law can be passed that will make it possible to submerge the gold standard in a flood of irredeemable paper currency.” ~ Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr. (1913)

We the People Were Our Own Bankers

Before the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed into law, many people owned their own land free and clear of any bank liens, encumbrances or mortgages. We retained sovereign“allodial” title to property with all rights therein.

Conventional mortgages, where one could borrow money to pay for a piece of land or property over the course of thirty years, did not exist. This turned out to be yet another not so subtle property confiscation scheme.

Prior to the Act, one simply acquired land by assignment from a previous owner with a Bill of Sale, paid for in gold or silver coin or notes, then updated the “land patent“and received the true, lawful “allodial” title,which is absolute title and ownership to the land. Back then, land was not registered or recorded via an “equitable deed”.

> HYPOTHECATE – To pledge something as a security without taking possession of it.

After the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, all land and property within the federal U.S.was “hypothecated” to the Board of Governors as “Trustees” of the Federal Reserve Banking System cartel. In any Trust, the “Trustees” hold legal title, and have control over the assets of the third party or the “Beneficiaries”.

> RE-VENUE – To shift jurisdiction from one “venue” or place to another; to shift the jurisdiction from the Republic of the united states of America to the Democracy of the federal United States corporation.

Venue and Citizenship

All that remained to seal the deal was to “re-venue” all sovereign “state” Citizens, along with their land, assets and property, then pursuant to the “Common law” jurisdiction of the united states of America, into the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal U.S. government corporation pursuant to the “Municipal law” of the District of Columbia (D.C.).

Today, the common meaning of “re-venue” is synonymous with “income”. The private international bankers, with the cooperation of the political establishment in Washington D.C., shifted the jurisdiction from one “venue” or place (united states of America) to another (District of Columbia).

After the bankers morphed the meaning of “venue”, they shifted the meaning of “citizens of the United States” from sovereign “state” Citizenship to U.S. citizenship. It was a clever, well-orchestrated slight-of-hand – a magician’s trick.

After the bankers shifted the meaning of citizenship, they made all the people believe that they were subject to paying the federal/national debt of the federal U.S. corporation pursuant to the 14th Amendment of the U.S. constitution, from that day forward, made payable to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) via the “income tax”.

U.S. Government Received Unlimited Credit Line

Under the terms of the Federal Reserve Act, the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) agreed to extend the federal U.S. government an “unlimited credit line” (paper money substitute (Ø)). The “United States” would be loaned all the funds needed by the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) to expand the power and reach of the federal “United States” empire indefinitely.

Like any other debtor borrowing money from a creditor, the federal U.S. government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. So what did it do?

Since the federal U.S. government did not have any significant assets in 1913, except a small modicum of public property, the government “hypothecated” all the private land and property of their “economic slaves” (U.S. citizens), as collateral (security) against the perpetually, un-payable federal/national debt.

The federal U.S. government, along with their principals/creditors, needed a legal contractual nexus to lure more U.S. citizens and sovereign “state” Citizens into their venue under their jurisdiction, in order to expand the pool of land and property that they could hypothecate, attach and lien. So how did they accomplish this?

By manufacturing wars (WWI, WWII and WWIII), recessions and depressions such as the Great Depression, and then luring people into the Social Security Act of 1938. This not so subtle “conspiracy” created the “welfare state”, accomplished the objectives in less than three generations.

In addition to land and property, the federal U.S. government “hypothecated” and pledged the assets of unincorporated federal territories, national parks and forests (clear-cutting forests is a environmental policy for federal debt reduction), birth certificates (each baby child is registered as property under the U.S. Department of Commerce), as well as all for-profit and non-profit corporations (all equity is owned by the Internal Re-Venue Service), as collateral to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)x.

Lastly, but not finally, these “co-conspirators” legislated a 1% federal income tax on corporations and U.S. persons (U.S. citizens and federal U.S. employees) to pay the “interest-only” on this expanding federal/national “debt (Ø)”. In 1913, less than 1% of the people and corporations paid any federal income taxes. This original income tax was effectively repealed by the Internal Revenue Act of November 23, 1921.

“The regional Federal Reserve Banks
are not government agencies.
…but are independent, privately owned and
locally controlled corporations.”
~ Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982)

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) is a very private, foreign entity controlled by a cartel of private international bankers. The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) can sue and be sued in their name, unlike actual government agencies. Each of the regional Federal Reserve Banks (FRB) carries its own liability insurance.

Each conducts its daily activities without any direction from the federal U.S. government. Each pays local property taxes and postage, which is even more evidence of private ownership. Each had listings in telephone directories, but never under U.S. government listings.

The actual “joint stock holders” of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) are held by domestic, foreign, and international central banks. According to archival sources, the following list does not reflect the actual ownership.

The Rothschild’s of London and Berlin.
The Lazard Brothers of Paris.
Israel Moses Seif of Italy.
Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany and Amsterdam.
Kuhn, Loeb and Co. of Germany and New York.
Lehman Brothers of New York.
Goldman Sachs of New York.
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
The Rockefeller Brothers of New York.

Formal Charges Against Federal Reserve

On May 23, 1933, U.S. Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), the U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, conspiracy, fraud, unlawful conversion, and treason. The following is a quote from McFadden’s famous address to the U.S. Congress in 1934.

“Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the FED.

The FED has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of much more than enough money to pay the Nation’s debt. The depredations and iniquities of the FED has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.

This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States. The FED has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the mis-application of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it. Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions.

[To the contrary] they are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; plus rich and predatory money lenders.

In that dark crew of financial pirates, there are those who would cut a man’s throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.”

References:

Wikipedia | History of the Federal Reserve; | Federal Reserve | Who owns the Federal Reserve? “The Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., is an agency of the federal government and reports to and is directly accountable to the Congress.” Federal Reserve SF | Is the Federal Reserve a privately owned corporation? ; Facts Are Facts | The Federal Reserve is privately owned. Citation Needed | Federal Reserve is a Joint Stock Company Trust; Wikipedia | Canon Law; Canon Law Trust.
Citation Needed | Joint Stock Trust Illegal in 1863; Constitution Congress | U.S. Constitution [1:9:3]; No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
Wikipedia | Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr.
Wikipedia | Admiralty/Maritime Law (federal courts derive their exclusive jurisdiction over this field from the Judiciary Act of 1789 and from Article III, § 2 of the U.S. Constitution; Congress regulates admiralty partially through the Commerce Clause.
Wikipedia | Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (text) www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/fract/ (text laid out in USC) www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode12/usc_sup_01_12_10_3.html; Banking Act of 1933 and Federal Open Market Committee purpose to “promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates” (12 USC §225a).
“Federal reserve banks,…shall be exempt from Federal, State, and local taxation, except taxes upon real estate.” (12 USC §531).
Brainy Quote | U.S. President Woodrow Wilson.
Brainy Quote | Henry Cabot Lodge, Sr.
Legal Dictionary | Definition of hypothecation.
New definition of “re-venue” by this author.
Wikipedia | Revenue Act of 1913; Statutes at Large for 1921, p.227 www.constitution.org/uslaw/sal/042_itax.pdf
Wikiquote | “Federal Reserve Bank is not a federal agency…Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its region”; Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2 1239 (9^th Cir. 1982) www.leadershipbygeorge.blogspot.com/2011/11/federal-reserve-is-private-corporation.html
Ownership of the Federal Reserve Bank. Kuhn Loeb and Co. got its start by exploiting Indians and setting up trading posts for the pioneers; anecdote about Kuhn and Loeb sourced from Free At Last by N.A. Scott, Ph.D., D.D., pp.4-39 (federal reserve is not part of the federal government) www.rainbowwarrior2005.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/federal-reserve-owners-and-history/
The House of Rothschid by Nial Ferguson: Amazon
Speech on Federal Reserve from Louis T. McFadden in the U.S. Congress www.scribd.com/doc/16502353/Congressional-Record-June-10-1932-Louis-T-McFadden

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.30 – 35

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

06. War Against the American Sovereign | New World Order / Deep State | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 8, 2022January 20, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

Many people are awakening to the blatant corruption and abuses of of the federal U.S. government, now occupying the free and independent states of the united states of America for the benefit of foreign powers. “U.S. citizens” or sovereign “state” Citizens, may be the last bastion of freedom rising (or falling) in the world today.

Your courageous reflection is essential. and may be the most important challenge of our times. Remember the insightful book by Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Treason.

Next Generation of Colonization

Historically, “colonization” is nothing new to the people of the world. Ancient civilizations and tribal nations were conquered, occupied, then settled during European conquests around the world led by Portugal, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, France, England and the United States. Moreover, these countries were never entirely free from the European Power structures that ruled them. The buzzword of “democracy” is used to describe these colonial powers, even if in fact they are a curious hybrid of capitalism, Socialism, Communism and Fascism posing as independent nations. These same countries are member states of the United Nations (UN), indebted to the international bankers, and no longer sovereign nations.

A new breed of financial, corporate, and political “colonization” is happening in the world today. As was discovered by the Power structures, occupying a nation by military force is unwieldy and expensive. Today, occupying a country economically, legally and mentally via media propaganda is a far smoother, more lucrative, and invisible strategy for total control. There are numerous occupations by foreign powers in numerous countries around the world. This practice is widespread today.

Frontline of Freedom and Sovereignty

According to a recent D.C. Research poll, Americans are more afraid of their own government than of “terrorists”, and are unwilling to give up their civil liberties to fight them. When pollsters asked Americans, “In general, do you have more confidence in local, state or federal government?” Almost four in five Americans from all races volunteered that they had no confidence in government at any level.

American Nationals or sovereign “state” Citizens of the free and independent sovereign states of the Republic began losing their sovereignty after the American Civil War. This erosion of Citizenship and the free and independent states has continued unabated. We will discuss more about Citizenship in future chapters of this book.

The united states of America, distinct from the U.S. government corporation, is on the frontline of the New World Order assault upon the sovereignty of all the nations and peoples of the world. We the People had a well-founded legal precedent for maintaining individual and national sovereignty that stood in the way of the emerging Global Power structure. This is a bold statement of truth.

First, to achieve a de facto one world government without the consent of the people required obliterating the entire idea of sovereignty, both individual and national. To achieve this took an incredible effort and gigantic expense to destroy the innate free will of all of humanity.

Second, despite the deployment of the fear-based, authoritarian “plandemic” response to COVID-19, the escalation of international relations into World War III, destruction of the middle class via extreme inflation, and concocted divisiveness via Critical Race Theory (CRT) and gender confusion, the New World Order will not succeed in destroying the immense diversity and innate freedom of the entire human race. This is especially true if We the People restore our capacity to see the truth and the light of day.

Third, regardless of “mind control” and media propaganda abounding and compliant tendencies of the masses, the inborn, innate desire for freedom and higher consciousness is still abundantly alive and well! Our perspectives may be confused temporarily, thus, hampered for awhile, but the truth shall set us free.

“The New World Order cannot happen
without U.S. participation,
as we are the most significant single component.
Yes, there will be a New World Order.
Citizens will force the United States
to changeits perceptions.”
~ Henry Kissinger

Introducing the American Sovereign

The federal U.S. government, and the foreign powers now directing it, have waged a hundred year assault upon the U.S. Constitution and this Republican form of government. Our country, and its respective American National or sovereign “state” Citizens, were created over 230+ years ago.

“Our national government formally declared war on the American people in 1933 by amending the Trading With the Enemies Act (1917) to include all American sovereign “state” Citizens and suspending the U.S. Constitution through the Emergency and War Powers Acts which has continued until this day.”

The federal U.S. government has neither acknowledged, nor apologized, for its ongoing war upon its own sovereign “state” Citizens. We the People can reconstruct a de jure government by returning to the organic law that preceded the creation of the federal U.S. government, and thereby rebuild the foundation for a renewed “republican form of government” for all the people – this time regardless of race, creed, class, sex, or color, or financial class.

The Constitution of the United States, not the organic law that preceded it, may now have been suspended temporarily, but hopefully not destroyed forever. Rather than the current tsunami of illegal immigrants, the united states of America merely needs to be re-inhabited by an American National or sovereign “state” Citizens to restore constitutional government.

To restore the united states of America is not a matter of executive action, legislative action, judicial action, or majority rule in a democracy, but an individual matter of free will and choice. Will you reclaim your birthright or not? You decide whether or not to walk the path of individual sovereignty and exercise your “unalienable rights”.

“The “republican form of government” must be reconstituted from the bottom-up, not from the top-down. Will you throw off the chains of democracy and tyranny? Will you throw off the New World Order and establish a “Another World Order”? It is all around you.

Presently, many “U.S. citizens” and sovereign “state” Citizens are in exile within the “United States”, without a homeland, without a country, until constitutional government is restored in the united states of America. However, we can still live a fantastic life in our own homes, radiate sovereign principles and ethics, then show others what it means to live as a sovereign human being.

Principles of self-government continue to exist in the organic “Common law” and the “Natural law” that preceded it. Furthermore, there exist public laws and case laws of over 244+ years of the American system of law before it was corrupted by “statutes”.

However, reigniting the organic, “Common law” requires a flood of thoughtful, historically and legally astute “citizens of the United States”, declaring by a Verified Affidavit their status as sovereign “state” Citizens to re-inhabit the united states of America and transform tyranny into to a “republican form of government”.

Without sovereign “state” Citizens formally restoring a “republican form of government”, there can be no sovereign states, counties, townships, grand juries or constitutional law courts – there can be no united states of America.

References:

Refers to the infamous None Dare Call it Treason by John A. Stormer; Amazon
North American News Service, Summer ‘96, p.96.
Quote sourced from Henry Kissinger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel (April 19, 1994).
Sourced from Senate Report 93-459, War Powers Statutes (anthology of all related emergency war powers legislation and emergency war powers acts); Secret, Veiled and Obscure: The Presidents Emergency Powers by Iain Poole, Perceptions Magazine, Fall 1994, p.10
Liberty International and Fox News | US Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch on his concern for America’s future: ‘Republics have a checkered history’.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.219 – 221

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

05. Crime Control and Domestic Terrorism | Terrorism and War | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 7, 2022January 20, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The FBI has acknowledged that the overall violent crime rate has gradually decreased or remaining steady in many locations, when adjusted against an increase in population outside of large cities. This is contrary to what the deceptive media would like us to believe. In truth, there is not actually an increase in crime except in Democrat-controlled cities, but there has been an increase of prosecutions against specific types of individuals deemed dangerous to the corporate “State” and federal U.S. government corporation.

Beware of the unspoken agenda behind new crime bills and legislation that invents new types of crime. Crime is big business. Crime keeps the people afraid. Crime gives the media something to report about. Crime gives the government justification for stepping in and taking more control from We the People.

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (H.R. 3355) was the first “superhighway to fascism”. This bill abolished the Bill of Rights, abrogates due process, and eliminates any pretense of checks and balances against the abuse of government police powers.

This legislation had little impact on street-level crime which has been statistically steady or in decline. This law is only one of a series of statutes passed over decades that have curtailed even the most rudimentary of constitutional and civil rights.

Any individual or organization in the “United States’ who had or should have had knowledge that an associate might commit a “terrorist act” can have their property seized.

Politically active organizations are especially vulnerable to the Violent Crime Control Act and the The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. Forfeiture provisions are written like Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) acts. Broadly written definitions of intent to commit terrorist acts is worded as “appear to be intended.”

Any attempt to influence the policies of government, either by reason or intimidation, is now interpreted as a “terrorist act”. If a defendant seeks to discover evidence against him-her, the attorney for the government may object on the grounds of “national security”.

Discovery of witnesses, evidence, and due process have been eliminated. Illegal search and seizure is redefined while eliminating an innocent citizen’s redress in suits against government officials and agents. Sentencing guidelines have been increased for “terrorist crimes”.

Any organization that the U.S. President declares to be “terrorist”, regardless of any legitimate activity they might pursue, could result in ten-year sentences and/or deportation for Citizens supporting their cause. Due process has been eliminated by permitting the use of secret evidence never shown to the defendant or his-her lawyer.

This legislation further criminalizes acts of violence, which are already illegal, as well as criminalizing donating funds to alleged “terrorist” organizations for humanitarian and otherwise legal activities. It gave new powers to the FBI, and other government agencies, including the military, to investigate political groups and causes.

Informants are afforded incentives for testifying against an accused party. Informants often testify falsely to mitigate their own sentencing. The government has no difficulty recruiting informants to cause the incarceration of any Citizen considered a threat to the government’s political agenda. Additionally, informants and law enforcement agencies focused on the prevention of “terrorist acts” are funded in part by the seizures and forfeitures collected from alleged “terrorists” who must then prove their innocence.

U.S. citizens, and/or sovereign “state” Citizens, exercising their constitutional rights to free speech, press and association could be targeted by agents who know their jobs with the government depend upon property seizures, fines, and arrests. This is despite the legal fact that Americans Nationals or sovereign “state” Citizens are “foreign” to the federal U.S. government corporation.

EO 12949 (February 13, 1995) authorized the Attorney General to approve physical searches without a court order to acquire “foreign” intelligence information.

Since the Oklahoma City bombing, former Attorney General Janet Reno and media propagandists have slandered and libeled sovereign “state” Citizens, constitutionalists, patriots, tax-protesters, or anyone who disagrees with the government as a “domestic or paper terrorist”. Newt Gingrich was quoted from the floor of the U.S. Congress as saying, “We’re going to nip those sovereignty people in the bud.”

We the People are being labeled by the media spin-doctors as extreme right-wing paramilitary organizations, “white supremacists” or domestic terrorists. Granted, there are a few extreme and fanatical elements in the “sovereignty” movement as there is in any other movement or organization, including the Roman Catholic Church. We assert that extremism is far less than 1% of the tax-honesty and “sovereignty” movement.

To an unthinking, indiscriminate public eye, an accusation or indictment equals a conviction, in their minds. Too many people do not and will not think for themselves, or even confirm information before drawing conclusions and passing the false gossip on to their friends and families.

ACCUSATION ≠ CONVICTION

Some people are so desperate that they require a “scapegoat” to express their inner rage, anger and frustration, so strong is the emotion and irrational thinking an indiscriminate mind no longer cares who actually committed the crime, so long as somebody gets punished. Then, one can comfortably go back to sleep again.

Unfortunately, the prisons are full of innocent victims because of this awful mindset, this sickness that pervades American society. This is an extremely tragic state of affairs.

We have already discussed numerous abuses of power over the last four decades. To give these abusively drunk-with-power agencies even more power with less accountability is tantamount to political suicide for the united states of America.

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 , the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 were both horrible legislation for the freedom-loving “citizens of the United States”, as was the USA Patriot Act. The initial version of the USA Patriot Act expired in 2019, but was amended in 2020. The USA Patriot Act made U.S. military installations and prisons such as Guantanamo Bay possible with no respect for due process of law for the inmates.

References:

Wikipedia | Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (H.R. 3355); Alexander Christopher, Pandora’s Box, pp.489-506; The [Violent] Crime Control Act of ’93 by William Cooper, Truth Seeker, Vol 121, #1, 1994, p.39 (should violence result for any reason at a public assembly, the property forfeiture provisions of this bill may be triggered); Center for Media and Public Affairs, The Register Guard, Eugene, Oregon and REX-84.
Ibid. (discovery of witnesses, evidence and due process have been eliminated) – Title 7 USC §2333 (illegal search and seizure redefined while eliminating an innocent Citizen’s redress in suits against the government officials and agents) – Title 7 USC §2337; (sentencing guidelines have been increased for terrorist crimes) – Title 7 USC §711; H.R.666 which would have changed the rules on admitting evidence that is illegally obtained.
EO#12949 published in Federal Register on Feb. 13, 1995 (foreign intelligence physical searches) sourced from Perceptions Magazine, May/June 1995, p.82.
Wikipedia | Newt Gingrich; Quote from Newt Gingrich.