civil rights

06. War on Drugs, War on Sovereign and Human Rights | New World Order / Deep State | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The “war on drugs” was and still is actually a “war on civil liberties, sovereign and human rights”. According to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) statistics police nationwide made a total of 12,196,959 arrests for all offenses in 2012. Of the total nationwide arrests, 1,552, 432 were for drug-related crimes or which 48.3% were marijuana offenses. There was one pot-related arrest every 42 seconds.

“There were an estimated 1,552,432 arrests for drug-related crimes in 2012 — a slight uptick from the 1,531,251 drug arrests in 2011. Marijuana offenses accounted for 48.3 percent of all drug arrests, a slight reduction from 49.5 percent in 2011, which itself was the highest rate since before 1995. Most marijuana-related arrests were for possession of the drug.”

Wrongful Death of Donald Scott Shot

Donald Scott, a nearly blind rancher was shot and killed by a multi-agency drug task force of over two dozen heavily armed California and federal agents including the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), Border Patrol, National Guard and Park Service in Malibu, CA. This consortium of forces mounted a military-type assault under the pretenses of a drug raid (February 2, 1992).

Further examination by the District Attorney proved the Sheriff department’s intent for the raid was the seizure of Scott’s land under drug forfeiture laws.

Anti-Drug Legislation Fuels Growth of Criminal Justice System

The Controlled Substances Act of 1972 and subsequent legislation such as the National Drug and Crime Emergency Act (H.R. 4079), and the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, threw our statutory civil rights and due process out the window.

This “war on drugs” justified all kinds of unconstitutional and unconscionable police activities for the last four decades, including illegal search, improper seizure and the forfeiture of property without a trial. May we never forget violations of 4th, 5th and 6th Amendment rights pursuant to the U.S. Constitution. 

Fortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court declared property forfeitures and illegal seizures unconstitutional, again. Yet still, these violations continue to happen everyday.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 1989 that state and federal agents could confiscate the assets and property of a person who possessed illegal drugs, or who committed a crime, even though charges had not been filed, and there had not been a trial. In December 1993, five of the nine justices held that there must first be a hearing before the property was seized. 

This “war on drugs” was hugely hypocritical considering that the most dangerous drugs were and are legal pharmaceuticals approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and marketed by doctors posing as legal drug dealers, backed with huge advertising budgets. Dealing pharmaceuticals was and is by far the most profitable business on the planet.

The “war on drugs” was preposterous. High-level government officials and the CIA have been involved in the importation of massive amounts of illegal, dangerous drugs over the last four decades to fund their political aspirations and to amass prodigious wealth for corrupt government officials.

Disinformation Drove Drug Prohibition

  According to Allen St. Pierre, Deputy Director of National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), “Beginning in 1988, federal spending on anti drug programs increased more than 300 percent, yet according to government statistics, illicit drug use remained virtually unchanged among adults and actually increased among adolescents.”

Despite the “war on drugs” heroine, cocaine, meth and opiates grew cheaper and more widely available than ever before, even in prisons — the one place you might imagine that the government could have accomplished drug prohibition. Drug prohibition was a failed experiment like alcohol prohibition, so it was doomed to be repealed or legalized. 

Opponents of drug prohibition agreed that the first step toward a solution was to get the federal U.S. government out of the business of prohibiting or regulating it. Instead of solving the problem of drug abuse, state and federal governments decided to partially legalize, license and regulate drugs such as marijuana due to the massive license fees they could derive from the activity much like they did for alcohol. 

The federal U.S. government has too much to gain being engaged in a perpetual drug war, namely power. Like any other war it gains more and more police enforcement power while various enforcement agencies are raking in huge revenues through asset forfeiture laws. There is no incentive for them to legalize or decriminalize drugs.

The U.S. government’s suppression of illegal drugs drove the market underground and raised the street value because of the risks involved in drug dealing. Supply and demand determined the street price while DEA confiscations reduced supply and street prices rose. 

Decisions about drug use should be up to the individual. If drugs must be regulated it should be on a local or state level, because the smaller a bureaucracy, the more receptive and innovative it can be. Advocates of drug decriminalization leaned toward treating excessive drug abuse as a public health problem, with people locally coming to a decision about what constitutes abuse. Many jurisdictions limited the advertising of drugs, including alcohol and tobacco. Many also included legal pharmaceutical drugs as candidates for abuse until Big Pharma successfully lobbied for unlimited advertising to promote their products.

The federal U.S. government has misapplied hundreds of billions of dollars in its totally ineffective drug war matched by a basic lack of understanding by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) about drug use and abuse. This DEA was politically motivated to expand their power and annual budgets, doing whatever it took to justify an increase each year. The Partnership for Responsible Drug Information refuted the twenty-two (22) major claims made in support of drug prohibition.

Marijuana Prohibition Ineffective

Paul Armentano, publications director for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), writes, “Contrary to popular myths, marijuana smokers are no different from their non-smoking peers except for their cannabis use… Like most everyone else, these folks are responsible citizens who work hard, raise families, contribute to their communities and want crime-free neighborhoods to live in.”

Mr. Armentano argued that arresting and jailing otherwise law-abiding people was a travesty of justice. NORML estimated that 100 million Americans, more than 41% of the U.S. population, had smoked marijuana at some time in their lives.

Despite its sometimes adverse, long-term affects, many successful business and political leaders admitted to using marijuana. The vast majority of users did not become dependent, and they did not go on to use other illegal drugs. Alcohol and tobacco are just as much “gateway” drugs as marijuana to a small percentage bent on self-destruction.

Marijuana was legal in this country until the early 1900s. The Founders likely smoked it recreationally. Prior to its prohibition, the united states of America was never known as the landof “potheads”. In other words, smoking marijuana was not necessarily a huge problem.

That marijuana use is on the rise, in the wake of stepped up enforcement of existing laws, shows that drug prohibition is a total failure in discouraging use.  It was difficult to predict how or if usage would change with lesser penalties or legalization. Insight could be gained, however, from studying the results of decriminalization laws adopted by 11 American states during the 1970s.

Each state imposed a modest civil fine for minor marijuana offenses. In none of these states did lax laws cause any increase in marijuana use. Usage rates and related attitudes about the drug’s use remained the same in those states as in those that arrested users.

Mr. Armentano argued that, “By continuing to classify all cannabis use as criminal, including adults smoking in the privacy of their homes, we trample the constitutional liberties our nation was founded on; waste police and prosecutorial resources; clog the court system; fill costly and scarce jail and prison space; and needlessly destroy the lives and careers of genuinely good citizens.”

Hawai’i(an) Hemp Activists Suing Prosecutors

Hawai’ian hemp activists Robert Christie and Aaron Anderson sued Hawaii prosecutors Jay Kimura and Kay Iopa for $3 million in civil court. The plaintiffs were busted for possessing hemp seeds they say were sterile. Their complaint is based on being unfairly singled out by the government because of their outspoken views about marijuana. 

The suit alleges the prosecutors violated constitutional rights to “freely speak, petition the government and be free from unjust government repression.” The suit further accuses Kay Iopa of lying about results of tests about the viability of the hemp seeds and of singling out the plaintiffs when similar seeds are commonly sold in stores around Hawai’i. 

Industrial Hemp Movement Grows

Of course hemp and marijuana are not the same “weed”. Marijuana can get you high, but hemp does not. Hemp is used industrially to make rope, food, building materials, etc. Hemp advocates such as Carolyn Moran, owner of Living Tree Paper Company in Eugene, OR, show how growing hemp can alleviate worldwide deforestation.

Moran’s magazine Talking Leaves was printed on 100% tree-free hemp content paper — Tradition Bond — consisting of 10 percent hemp, 10 percent esparto grass, 60 percent agricultural by-products (like cotton  and flax) and 20 percent post-consumer recycled fibers. In the 1990s, Moran foresaw growing of hemp as eventually going mainstream. 

Moran said, “We need to put pressure on the industry to create more plant-based paper…Consumers need to put their money where their conscience is.”

The federal U.S. government did not at first seem to grasp that industrial hemp is a different plant than marijuana raised for mind-altering purposes. They forgot the industrial value of hemp grown widely in early colonial America prior to prohibition. The political fact is that certain industries such as oil, cotton, lobbied effectively to make hemp and marijuana illegal so that their industries would flourish instead of the widely available and easy to grow industrial hemp.

Mari Kane, publisher of Hemp Pages. The International Hemp Journal said, “Hemp provides alternative sources for fabrics, paper, health and beauty aids; building materials, food products and car fuel. It’s a plant that can provide alternatives to almost anything synthetic.”

First steps toward legalization began in Colorado when the state introduced the Hemp Production Act in 1995 and 1996. The bills were defeated both times, but they did receive endorsements from the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) and many other respected groups. The bills main opposition was from the federal Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Later on, a protest was sounded by the White House National Drug Council when footwear giant Adidas marketed hemp shoes. 

Adidas defended their product, stating that hemp is a versatile and durable fabric with a proven track record, and that hemp may be the answer to the world’s fiber shortage.

The Agricultural Act of 2014 had permitted the growing and cultivation of industrial hemp for research purposes only. Industrial hemp production remained illegal in this country until the Agricultural Act of 2018 removed hemp from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). In 2018, U.S. President Donald Trump signed the legislation into law to make industrial hemp legal again.

References:

  1. U.S. News and World Report | Police made one marijuana arrest every 42 seconds in 2012; Drug Policy Facts; Nine Million Arrests, NORML; Anti-Drug Abuse Act (1988) from Pandora’s Box by Alexander Christopher p.525.
  2. Wikipedia | Wrongful Death of Donald Scott; Wikipedia | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF or ATF).
  3. Conservapedia | Controlled Substances Act of 1972; Wikipedia | Removal of Cannabis from Schedule I.
  4. Supreme Court Kills Drug Tax, Associated Press (drug possession taxes were barred); High Quality Textiles and Paper by John Stahl, Perceptions Magazine, Summer 1994, p.26 (on the commercial applications of hemp); Only A Matter of Time: Legal Medical Marijuana by Robert D. Kampia, Perceptions, Spring 1994, p.26 (medical applications of hemp); Good publications include HempLine Journal, Drug Policy Review, F.E.A.R. Chronicles.
  5. U.S. Government Drug Involvement by William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, p.473.
  6. Wikipedia | NORML www.norml.org
  7. Partnership for Responsible Drug Information www.prdi.org; AntiShyster (Volume 6, No.2, p.49 and Volume 6, No. 2, p34); Free American (September 1996, p.22); Perceptions Magazine (August/September, 1996, p.84); Reviewed by Estar Holmes. Contact: 14 W. 68th St., New York, NY 10023. (212) 362-1964.
  8. Sourced from NORML.
  9. Statistics from NORML;  Wikipedia | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
  10. Stop the War on Marijuana Smokers by Paul Armentano, Perceptions Magazine  (October/November 1996). Reviewed by Shay McNamara.
  11. Perceptions Magazine  (March/April ’96).
  12. Liberty International and The Hill | Trump officially legalizes industrial hemp.
  13. Carolyn Moran, Talking Leaves.
  14. Ibid.
  15. Mari Kane, Hemp Pages, The International Hemp Journal; Rethinking Hemp by Anne W. Wilke, E Magazine, July/August 1996; Reviewed by Shay McNamara.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.236 – 240

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

04. United Nations | Global Power Structure | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

Founding of the United Nations

The United Nations (UN) was founded on October 24, 1945 in the aftermath of World War II. The UN was the substitute for the League of Nations which failed on its first attempt to create one-world government after World War I. Today, there are 193 member states of the United Nations (UN). All participate in the United Nations General Assembly.

There are five permanent member states: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly.

Compare the United Nations “Charter of Rights” with the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” as author and educator G. Edward Griffin did. You will notice a profound difference. Whereas the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” grants human rights “except where prohibited by law”, the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” limits and prohibits the federal U.S. government corporation from infringing upon the inherent sovereign “unalienable rights” of its sovereign “state” Citizens and U.S. citizens.

This demonstrates the profound distinction between “human rights”, or “civil rights”, and “unalienable rights”. One does not acknowledge individual “sovereignty” and the other does.

If you look back at the Congressional Record, you will discover that “United States” participation in the United Nations (UN) was never lawfully ratified by the U.S. Congress, even though the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” was approved in 1945. All member states of the United Nations (UN) must surrender a portion of their inherent national sovereignty to participate. The UN Security Council coordinates military/peacekeeping operations of its member states along with the Agency for International Development. Given the state of the world, we are not certain how much “peacekeeping” has actually occurred since its inception.

After the COVID-19 “plandemic”, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed to its member states signing on to an international treaty to appoint WHO as the global agency in charge of all future “plandemic” responses worldwide. Considering WHO’s ineptness and dishonesty in dealing with the COVID-19 “plandemic” from 2020 – 2022, not to mention persistently lying to the public to protect China’s interests, this is a ludicrous and dangerous idea.

During his term in office as U.S. President, Donald Trump addressed the United Nations (UN) with his “America First” policy, which is a policy whereby each member state should put their own people and their own “sovereignty” above that of the globalists. 

If every nation was indeed “sovereign”, there would be less problems to deal with globally. But one-world government is not about solving problems or improving the quality of life for the people of the world. One-world government is about power, unelected power, top-down power ruling us all from the very apex of the pyramid.

For the first time in decades, a sitting U.S. President advocated for a strong policy of “national sovereignty” for every nation in the world during his annual speech to the United Nations (UN). He was met with laughter and ridicule by most of the member states. That says it all.

Sovereign Nations Need Not Apply

Sovereign nations such as “Taiwan” will not be admitted to the United Nations (UN) because China, who is a powerful member of the Security Council, is opposed to the idea. China still claims that “Taiwan” is a rogue state and is a “territory” of China. That is despite the fact that “Taiwan” was settled by “freedom fighters” who escaped mainland China during the Red Revolution.

“Taiwan” has not been admitted to the United Nations because China still lays claim to “Taiwan” as it did with Tibet before the Chinese invaded, took over Tibet and booted out the Dalai Lama. China is more eager than ever to reclaim “Taiwan” as part of China, but it will take a messy war to accomplish it.

“Taiwan” is also not bankrupt to the international bankers or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and/or World Bank (WB). As a rule of thumb, only indebted and perpetually bankrupt nations need apply to the United Nations (UN). 

There are a few “gold-backed” exceptions to this rule, such as digital or blockchain currencies in the United States, Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Indonesia, China and Russia. Russia is debt-free to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and has one of the lowest debt to GDP ratios in the world. 

One principle of “national sovereignty” is that only one sovereign nation state can occupy the same geography at the same time. Thousands of unrecognized indigenous nations exist who are not eligible for United Nations (UN) membership, because they are within the boundaries of other member nations.

Before the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) central banking system in the “United States”, the government created the post office and national banks without interference or intrusion by the international banks. Debt-free nations can create and print their own money internally instead of relying on the Rothschilds/Rockefeller central banking system. Debt-free nations are economically sustainable without any need of foreign borrowing with interest.

United Nations Global Governance Commission

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance called for a World Conference on Global Governance (1998). The purpose of the conference was to adopt treaties and agreements that would pave the way for one-world government before the year 2030.

The official United Nations (UN) motive for global government is the establishment of justice, human rights and economic equity worldwide. Social and economic justice, the theory goes, can only happen when all of humankind is equalized with an idea such as “Universal Basic Income (UBI)”. That sounds like a very socialist/communist idea.

Apparently, Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF) suggested that by 2030 the mass of humanity will “own nothing, but be happy.” This is part of their grandiose notion of a “Great Reset”.The authors of this book politely disagree and do not concur with Schwab’s assessment.

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance assumed that people will be ready by 2030 to accept a new “global ethic”. But they said that “people of the land” may have to overcome the primal instinct of wanting to own either private or community property. Those who buck the United Nation’s plans will be “reeducated”through the use of international law backed with military force.

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance says, “Global taxation is necessary to service the needs of the global neighborhood. The safeguarding of the global commons cannot be achieved with the current drip-feed approach to financing.”

A United Nations Global Transaction Tax, among other world tax schemes, was proposed to fund an expansion of the United Nations. Many other funding proposals have been made. During COVID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a 10% of GDP global tax from every member state to fight the “plandemic”. Most of these proposals have failed to pass as all have been challenged on the basis of “national sovereignty”. 

The Global Commission to Fund the United Nations revealed that today’s present financial constraints on United Nations (UN) activities require a change in financing methods for the world body. They assert it’s now time to “shift the burden of financing the UN from national to global sources by introducing charges for the use of the global commons, for example, the Internet, or levies on international activities such as foreign currency transactions.”  

United Nations Flow Chart and Treaties

  • United Nations Charter (UN)
  • UN Budget (2021)
  • UN Security Council
  • UN Treaties
  • UN Arms Treaty
  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Program)
  • World Health Organization 
  • UNICEF
  • Agency for International Development
  • World Bank (WB)

United States Support for United Nations

The Clinton Administration supported the United Nation’s (UN) program enthusiastically. For instance, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, wrote an article for Time magazine called The Birth of the Global Nation, and he won the Global Governance Award from the World Federalist Association (1993). 

U.S. President Clinton supported the UN’s agenda with his Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25), a declassified document. A summary revealed the “Creation by the UN of a Plans Division, an Information and Research Division, an Operations Division, a Logistical Division, A Public Affairs Cell, a Civil Police Cell and a Professional Peace Operations Training Program.”

The United Nations (UN) needed and needs to maintain a rapidly deployable headquarters team and modest airlift capabilities. The Clinton administration claimed that Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25) gives the U.S. President authority to assign U.S. military personnel to the United Nations for “peacekeeping” missions in Somalia and other places. 

The George W. Bush Administration did not support the United Nations (UN) as enthusiastically as did Clinton. He took a radical departure toward unilateral action by the “United States” with no regard to the international community. “The audacity of Bush’s Iraq war maneuvers and his crude bullying threatens not only the United Nations, but the dream of world governance and world peace…Bush returned international relations to the raw power politics of the nineteenth century and abandons international law for the law of the jungle.”

The Obama Administration did much the same as Bush and Clinton. Since the United Nations (UN) is based in New York City, on land donated by the Rockefellers. The primary funder of the United Nations (UN) is the “United States”. Due in part to the UN’s ineptness, the Trump Administration cut funding for the United Nations (UN) suggesting that other member states make larger contributions.

References:

  1. United Nations Security Council | Five permanent members and ten elected every two years.
  2. Wikipedia | Freedom Force International | G. Edward Griffin compares the United Nations Charter with the U.S. Constitution | Cato Institute | Comparing EU Constitution with U.S. Constitution.
  3. White House Archives | Donald Trump addressing the United Nations (UN) on his “America First” policy.
  4. Wikipedia | Taiwan is still on the gold-standard.
  5. Citation Needed | Six countries not part of the World Bank Group are as follows: Cuba, North Korea, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and Nauru. Taiwan has the largest economy outside the World Bank. The two observer states, Vatican City as well as the State of Palestine, are also non-members.
  6. SCMP | China’s local government debt a concern?; Wikipedia | List of nations with external debt; As an interesting footnote China’s National Audit Office said that local government obligations hit 45 trillion yuan ($7 trillion USD) by the end of 2020 — a dramatic increase from the 10.7 trillion yuan figure reported in 2010; In fact China’s listed debt is internal, not external.
  7. Wikipedia | List of Countries by External Debt.
  8. Stanford Basic Income Lab | Universal Basic Income.
  9. World Economic Forum | Great Reset.
  10. Wikipedia | Proposed world tax schemes.
  11. Wikipedia | UN Charter.
  12. UN News | UN Budget 2021; The annual UN budget is slightly more than $3 billion USD.
  13. Wikipedia | UN Security Council www.un.org/en/sc/
  14. Wikipedia | UN Treaties (and all other treaties with the U.S.).
  15. Wikipedia | UNESCO www.unesco.org/new/en.
  16. Wikipedia | UNEP www.unep.org
  17. Wikipedia | World Health Organization www.who.int/en
  18. Wikipedia | UNICEF www.unicef.org
  19. Wikipedia | US Agency for International Development www.usaid.gov
  20. Wikipedia | World Bank www.worldbank.org
  21. Sourced from Multiple Land Use Review, March/April 1996; Citation Needed | Treason in High Places by William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, pp.239-249 (comments on the United Nations Treaty, the United Nations Participation Act V. the sovereignty of the United States of America); Amazon | Wikipedia | Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25; PDD-25 was intended to prevent the United States from using UN peacekeeping operations as the centerpiece of its foreign policy. 
  22. Progressive Magazine | Bush Trashes the UN.
  23. Independent | Donald Trump to sign executive order to dramatically reduce funding of UN.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.137 – 141

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

00. Dangerous & Exciting Times | Introduction | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

These are dangerous times to be exercising our “unalienable rights” and/or “civil rights” in the united states of America. These are also exciting and momentous times to be alive while taking a courageous stand for freedom. As Bob Dylan’s classic song wisely said, “The times they are a changing”. 

Although not self-evident via the propaganda media, the tide is shifting quickly away from the tyranny of centralized authority and slowly toward restoring freedom for all the people. Eventually, the chains of human bondage will be broken and a more courageously enlightened generation will unleash a mighty power on our most precious and sacred Earth. 

Lovers of liberty, may we stand up and be counted. Stand up for your freedom, your rights, your innate “sovereignty”. Challenge “external authority”.  Question the narrative, and resist the New World Order/Deep State. Reexamine belief systems and “free yourself from mental slavery”.

Freedom in America

Whatever happened to freedom in the united states of America? Today, it is rarely found in our civil society. Many of our political leaders are too ignorant of the principles of this country, thus, too corrupt, blind and/or cowardly to protect or defend our most precious rights. Many are bent on destroying the U.S. Constitution and shredding it for their own self-interest and power.

Freedom in America is not found in a comfortable citizenry, a brainwashed, stupefied public without the knowledge or willpower to defend their most basic self-interest, rights and freedom, all too willing to accept political indoctrination without questioning authority, or their own underlying beliefs. 

A life unquestioned or unexamined is hardly a life worth living. The COVID-19 “plandemic” was a huge boon for awakening all the people of the world. Those who do not “awaken” remain “woke” living in the darkness of a media-generated cult. The truth of human existence on Earth has been revealing itself for millennia, now obvious and self-evident for those with the eyes to see and the ears to hear.

Why listen to the so-called experts, fake news, or false prophets for answers? Answers cannot be found there. Freedom in America is not heard on the evening news, or on the internet. Alternative viewpoints, perspectives, and solutions are emerging, and it is there you will find hope, prayers, and powerful answers for the future. Many visionary leaders are hard to find, but they exist all around you. These new leaders are not born, but made by fire, trials, tribulations and a vision for a new America and the world. 

Desire Freedom and Truth

How much do we desire freedom? How much do we desire sovereignty? How much do we love ourselves? We have a choice: to examine our life, our beliefs, and to learn from history, or be condemned to repeat the mistakes of the past. How many people will die without knowing deep purpose in their lives? How many more will suffer lack on this Earth while living in the land of plenty?

How long will we sleepwalk through our human existence? When will we awaken to the loud drumbeat for freedom, sovereignty, and consciousness that is emerging worldwide? 

How long will we turn our backs on a friend, a neighbor, a family member, or our country? When will we stand courageously beside them? For if we do not stand for others in times of crisis, who will stand for us? It is the courage and sacrifice that created the united states of America that will make this country great again (MAGA).

Everybody Wins, No Plunder

Imagine all the people of the precious Earth succeeding.  Everybody can win. This is our vision for the future. There is plenty for everyone. There is no need for racism, bigotry, war, or more genocides of indigenous cultures. The future is inclusive, not exclusive, however, every one must respect the rights, culture, contributions, and/or property of others as well as their own. 

There can be no more “legal plunder”, no more laws passed to justify stealing from one, then giving to another. Each and every one is responsible for their own co-creation, their own productivity, and the consequences of their actions. There is a higher “Natural law”; to be happy and free we must abide by that calling.

By protecting the life, liberty and property of your neighbors, as well as your own, we will receive protection in return. Plunder, and we shall be plundered by the New World Order/Deep State. This is the “golden rule (karma)” in action.

Honesty Please, No Tyranny

May there be honesty and integrity. There have been too many lies, deceits, and dishonesty by the elite’s Power Structure as they foist a grand illusion/deception upon us. Enough false promises of protection, security and safety which have catapulted us even more dangerously toward the loss of our freedoms. May we tell “the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. May we make a promise to not only speak, but listen to and act upon these self-evident truths.

If we fail to notice the signs, or the writing on the wall, then we may fail to notice our liberty and property are under attack, not by enemies from foreign countries, but from enemies within our own “government”.

Government as a Fraud

Today, our so-called “government” is a monumental fraud. The “income tax” is a fraud. Political leaders are liars and thieves. May we stop believing the propaganda. This Sovereign’s Handbook was born with a mission: to reveal hidden insights about government, history/herstory, law, money, power, economics, and politics, so one can reclaim one’s “unalienable rights” as a sovereign human being.

May we finally tell the truth about the state of our world. This book is dedicated to all freedom fighters and lovers of freedom and truth – for without these courageous pioneers and brave warriors, this once free America will most certainly be lost.

References:

  1. Wikipedia | Song by Bob Dylan.
  2. Native News Online | Dr. Martin Luther King Jr: Our Nation was Born in Genocide.
  3. Note: “Unalienable rights” are inherent, sovereign rights that cannot be “liened” or encumbered by any legislative “statute”.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.16 – 17

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK