The science of genetic engineering raised questions about who owns the genetically manipulated materials that scientists experiment with in their laboratories, and whether the people from whom the raw materials are extracted have rights to the proceeds from the resulting commercialized products.
This issue became particularly relevant during the massive gene-altering experiment administered to the majority of the human population without first revealing the long-germ effects.
The administration of genetically altering human DNA/RNA injections implied that the altered individual DNA became owned by the corporation that owned patents to the technology. If the mRNA is designed to replicate throughout the host body, do corporations producing the mRNA technology have claims on or now own the majority of humanity?
Sounds preposterous, but considering legal precedent and the modus operandi of the Global Power structure, let us think about this again. The answer is not entirely clear at this time, but the following historical case may further illuminate some of the issues.
In 1984, the UC Los Angeles Medical Center developed a cell line valuable in fighting bacteria and cancer. The University filed a patent claim on the line that was commercially developed. The human from whom the cell was taken filed a lawsuit claiming that he was entitled to a share of profits.
The California Supreme Court ruled in 1990 that a donor has no “property right” in tissue removed from his or her body. Moreover, remuneration to a donor would hinder research by restricting access to necessary raw materials, thereby interfering with the progress of science.
A patent claim was filed under the name of U.S. Secretary of Commerce, Ron Brown, on the cell of a Guayami woman from Panama in 1993. Her DNA was of special interest because the Guyami people carry a unique virus whose antibodies may be useful in AIDS and leukemia research. International protest and action by the Guyami General Congress and supporters led to a withdrawal of the patent claim.
The U.S. Department of Commerce filed patent claims on the DNA of indigenous people from the Solomon Islands. The government of the Solomon Islands declared the action was an invasion of sovereignty with lack of “informed consent” by the “donors”, then demanded the genetic samples be repatriated.
The U.S. Commerce Secretary responded with a letter that read, “There is no provision for considerations related to the source of cells that may be the subject of a patent application.”
Human Genome Diversity Project
The Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) harvests cells from indigenous people worldwide. This raises troubling questions about the exploitation of indigenous people for their genetic assets. This is not organizationally related to the Human Genome Project.
The HGDP-CEPH Human Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel, is a resource of 1,063 cultured lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) from 1,050 individuals in 52 world populations, banked at the Foundation Jean Dausset-CEPH in Paris.
Since initially there existed a lack of international policy governing the human genetic material market, it was suggested that certain “contracts” may offer some control to those individuals who donate genetic materials.
However, contracts, treaties and other negotiations have historically provided indigenous people little protection from property-hungry interests.
Furthermore, the idea of ownership and property rights being extended to all facets of the natural world is a western notion of law that is contrary to the concept of stewardship inherent in the cosmologies, traditions and cultures of indigenous people.
Vampire Project Challenged by Indigenous Alliance
A consortium of scientists, universities, governments and private interests called the Human Genome Organization (HUGO) adopted the Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP) in 1994 to further their objective of mapping the entire human DNA sequence.
The multinational, multi-billion dollar project focused on 772 groups of indigenous people on the assumption that they will inevitably become extinct. Called the Vampire Project, the effort consisted of researchers gathering blood, hair roots, cheek scrapings and saliva samples from living people.
The cell samples were harvested from 50 people per group. Dr. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, a principle founder of the project, said the scientific rationale for selecting 50 individuals per group is that, “One person can bleed 50 people and get on an airplane in one day.”
The invasive project was challenged by an international alliance of indigenous peoples from South, Central and North America. The “First People”, as many indigenous humans refer to themselves, resented being identified as “isolates of historic Interest” by HUGO, thus questioned, then resisted, the ethical implications of the entire plan.
Indigenous communities were not only concerned with the obvious exploitation of their body parts. They were alarmed that the consequent information could be used for “racist” agendas, even genocide and biological warfare.
The Human Genome Diversity Project was the brainchild of Dr. Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, a renowned population geneticist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA. He wants to reconstruct the recent history of homo sapiens via a comparison of the genomes of different human populations. Why? “Purely in the interest of science,” he contended.
The implications of his project were reviewed by UNESCO’s International Bioethics Committee (IBC) in Paris, France. The group acknowledged the validity of the project’s scientific goals, but also endorsed the criticism of indigenous peoples, whose genes were the main targets of the research. Opponents of the project feared that indigenous groups would be exploited commercially by “genetic vampires”, doing Cavalli-Sforza’s bidding.
On the contrary, Dr. Cavalli-Sforza says the project should help to combat racism because experience so far shows that physiological and psychological intra-group differences are always greater than the mean differences between groups.
Dr. Cavalli-Sforza says, ”I have become used to being called a planner of genocide and of being accused of economic interest. My main aim is to defend the project and defend science.”
Human Tissue Enterprise Linked to U.S. Military
Human genetic material is routinely exchanged between the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and biological warfare medical units at the Fort Detrick near Washington D.C., according to a report by the Rural Advancement Foundation (RAFI).
Fort Detrick is infamous for its history as the U.S. military’s primary biological warfare research center and medical intelligence headquarters for the U.S. Department of Defense, also home of the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) unit charged with monitoring medical data gleaned from foreign populations.
Initially, thousands of human tissue samples collected from indigenous people and isolated communities around the world were evaluated by the biotechnology industry, academic researchers, and the government.
“There appear to be no policy or protocol barriers or ethical consideration to the routine exchange of foreign human cell lines between civilian researchers in the U.S. government and their military counterparts,” said RAFI Executive Director, Pat Roy.
Wikipedia | Human Genome Diversity Project; Patenting of Life and Its Implications for Indigenous Peoples, Debra Harry, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy; North American News Service, Summer ‘96, p.17.
Nature (October 5, 1995); The Human Genome Diversity Project and Its Implications for Indigenous Peoples, Debra Harry, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy; Abya Yala News, Spring 1995; Reviewed by Estar Holmes, Summer ‘96, p.17.
Edward Hammond, principal author of the communiqué, New Questions About Management and Exchange of Human Tissues at NIH/Indigenous Persons Cells Patented.
Source:Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3,p.254 – 257
ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!
Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition) (3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!
Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom (3rd Edition) (Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!
We the People have the “unalienable right” to do with our bodies as we choose, so long as we are not harming another. This is also the Hippocratic Oath which all medical doctors and health practitioners must adhere to. “Do no harm!”
Breathing fresh air, drinking clean, pure water, and eating organic, chemical and pesticide-free, nutritious food are necessary attributes of any healthy human being. Any local, state, federal, or one world government that presumes to have power over what we do with our bodies is ludicrous, preposterous and dangerous. Physical sovereignty is paramount and foundational to all the other “aspects of sovereignty”. Without physical sovereignty, we are nothing more than slaves.
All this became quite self-evident during the COVID-19 “plandemic”, when political leaders and public health officials worldwide dictated the conditions of humanity’s lives for much of two years, including “mandating vaccinations” and forced experimental procedures without an individual’s “informed consent”.
We the People must stand together and organize against these tyrannical politicians, and public health officials drunk with power. Step one is to take a stand for physical sovereignty over our bodies and never, never relinquish this inherent right and individual power. If the Power structure takes control of our bodies, and we comply willingly, there is little left of our humanity.
Keeping Holistic Modalities Available
We the People must keep holistic and alternative healing modalities available by any means necessary, despite extensive initiatives by Big Pharma to destroy freedom of choice over our bodies and well-being. The FDA, CDC and WHO do everything in their power to make alternatives to Big Pharma either “illegal” or inaccessible.
“The FDA protects Big Pharma corporations. The FDA is subsequently rewarded. Using the government’s police powers they attack those who threaten Big Pharma profits. And people still think that the FDA is protecting them!What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it is doing are as different as night and day.” ~ Dr. Herbert Ley, Former U.S. FDA Commissioner
FDA Raids and Assaults on Health Freedom
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has raided health food stores and alternative health clinics at gunpoint in pursuit of super-vitamins, herbs and other “unapproved” nutritional supplements. The FDA has threatened to arrest ordinary citizens in their homes for purchasing “unapproved”therapies.
For one of thousands of examples, Kenneth Shuart was threatened with arrest and intimidated in his home when an armed U.S. Marshal and an FDA Enforcement Agent came to his door and informed him that they had seized the KH3 he had ordered from Europe. We the People best protest and expose the FDAs outrageously illegal and unconstitutional actions whenever they arise.
Mr. Stuart and many others would have additional legal recourse if they understood the principles of sovereignty. Unfortunately, many people in the health freedom movement are still unaware of the power and significance of sovereignty.
The FDA is a federal U.S. government agency and has no power or authority over American Nationals or sovereign “state” Citizens. If you want to protect health freedom, then reclaim your sovereignty en
masse to restore the checks and balances that limit the federal U.S. government.
FDA Bullies Life Extension Foundation for Nine Years, Then Backs Down
Beginning in 1987, the Life Extension Foundation was persecuted and prosecuted for years prior to finally winning in federal courts. Afterward, they mounted an extensive campaign to expose other illegal actions by the FDA.
Unfortunately, the FDA thugs have been running amok for decades, persecuting good doctors, nutritionists, alternative cancer therapists and wellness professionals.
As the story goes, in 1987, two dozen armed FDA agents and U.S. Marshals smashed their way into the Life Extension Foundation offices in Hollywood, FL, with guns drawn. The search warrant later proved to have been obtained through perjured testimony by the FDA agent in charge.
Not finding what the search warrant allowed them to take, the agents grabbed everything they could, including literature, documents, computers and personal belongings not included in the warrant. They seized 5,000 copies of the foundation’s newsletter, which were ready for mailing — a flagrant violation of 1st Amendment rights.
Nine years of legal battles ensued. Evidence showed that the FDA agent in charge had intimidated a radio producer into banning appearances by Life Extension Foundation representatives. Repeatedly, they were threatened to be sent to prison for life if they did not cooperate with the FDA. Foundation owners, William Faloon and Saul Kent, stood their ground and fought back, at enormous personal and business expense.
The U.S. government poured millions of dollars into prosecuting the case, attempting to prove that the Foundation was purveying “unapproved drugs”— such as vitamins, minerals and amino acids. Failing to get the goods in one grand-jury fishing expedition, the FDA started again with a second grand jury, both times terrorizing Foundation witnesses with threats of personal investigation.
Further FDA raids, embargos on vitamin products and interstate terrorism by the FDA failed to induce Faloon and Kent to give up. Instead, they fought back hard with political activities, media counterattacks and legal motions, demonstrating the unconstitutionality of the false charges against them.
In 1991, the Foundation principles were indicted for having informed people in the 1980s about how to obtain life-sustaining drugs from overseas suppliers. Since the FDA has long permitted the importation of “unapproved drugs” for personal use, the Foundation’s action was truly innocent, yet they were arrested, handcuffed and jailed nonetheless.
The FDA’s brutal campaign against the Foundation began to break down. In 1992, it was ordered to return items seized in the first raid and offered a deal to settle the case. After this, the FDA made several other offers, each accompanied by threats, that never materialized.
Then, in 1995, the FDA made its most serious threat yet, claiming new evidence that would certainly send Faloon and Kent to jail for life. This kind of illegal intimidation has been the FDA’s standard operating procedure for decades, and it usually worked, but by the middle of 1995 the FDA offered to guarantee no prison time and even allow them to stay in business. In November 1995, the FDA asked the judge to drop all charges but one, obstruction of justice. Finally in 1996, after nine years of brutal harassment and anguish, the last charge was dropped.
Derailed for almost a decade, the Life Extension Foundation began funding research again, and thanks to its two victorious freedom-fighters, the rest of us can feel braver about facing down unruly U.S. government agencies such as the FDA.
GATT/WTO Crushes Health Supplements in Norway, Threatens United States
Big Pharma drug cartels invaded the European health-food market. Repressive new laws made herbs and other supplements almost entirely unavailable in Norway. The few that remained carried enormous price tags, and were sold only by corporate pharmacies. The Norwegian laws are identical to the German Codex proposal the U.S. Congress signed when it ratified the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the new GATT.
Health Choices Threatened by GATT/ WTO and the Codex Alimentarius
In another move to control virtually every minute aspect of our lives, the United States, European and Global Power structure began a campaign to monopolize the dietary supplements industry.
The U.S. Congress allowed Big Pharma drug cartels to monopolize the vitamin and health products industry via the World Trade Organization (WTO), now controlled by China, which dictates that the U.S. must “harmonize” its regulations governing the manufacture of such products with international standards. or be penalized.
The Codex Alimentarius Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses, now regulates the labeling and manufacturing of dietary supplements worldwide. The Committee is composed of delegates that represent national agencies and international organizations with 90% of the group being dominated by spokespeople for multinational pharmaceutical corporations.
Any delegate can propose regulations to the Committee and those proposals are subjected to a peer review period with votes occurring at various stages in the process. A proposal that runs the gauntlet of peer review unscathed becomes part of the official Codex Alimentarius.
The only delegate from the “United States” was Elizabeth A Yetley, Ph.D of the FDA. Due to political pressure in the united states of America, she voted on behalf of those who choose health freedom over tyranny.
A draconian proposal called Guidelines for Dietary Supplements would have resulted in the requirement of doctor’s prescriptions for most supplements available in this country, and almost did. The measure, introduced by the German delegation, called for the following:
No dietary supplements to be sold for prophylactic or therapeutic use.
No dietary supplement sold as a food to exceed potency levels set by the commission.
Codex regulations for dietary supplements to become binding.
All new dietary supplements to automatically be banned unless they went through the Codex approval process.
HIV Reappraised as Non-Contagious by Some Scientists and Medical Doctors
A growing numbers of scientists and medical doctors believe AIDS is not contagious and HIV is completely harmless. A newsletter devoted to this controversy, Reappraising AIDS, was published by The Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis. The Group was comprised of university professors, physicians, and community activists who believed this debate should be given a fair public hearing.
Editor Paul Philpott examined a sensational study published in England’s prestigious journal Nature. The study tracked about 2,000 hemophiliacs for 14 years. It documented a startling jump in mortality for those testing HIV-positive, but no increased mortality for those testing HIV-negative.
Mr. Philpott pointed out that the study could find no increased mortality among HIV positive hemophiliacs until 1986, one year after HIV testing was introduced. By that time, roughly half of Darby’s subjects were positive.
If “HIV positive” causes the deadly AIDS, then why did a large population, 50% comprised of HIV positives, not start dying until AFTER they had been diagnosed/tested as being HIV positive?
Philpott suggested that the principal cause of AIDS among HIV positive hemophiliacs is aggressive prophylactic treatment with toxic anti-HIV medications and intense anxiety from “HIV-positive” social stigma.He references other studies demonstrating that HIV is actually a relatively benign virus typically found only at very low concentrations, and sometimes not at all in AIDS patients.
AIDS Was Genetically Engineered
Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola: Nature, Accident or Genocide (1996) by Dr. Leonard Horowitz traced the development of the AIDS virus. Horowitz’s extensive scrutiny of over 2500 scientific papers and government documents revealed that HIV-1 and HIV-2 could both have originated from simian viruses genetically manipulated in laboratory experiments at the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
Dr. Horowitz began his investigation into the source of AIDS in 1993 after reading a U.S. Department of Defense appropriations request for $10 million for development of AIDS-like viruses. He reasoned that the emergence of AIDS coincided with major advances in genetic engineering of mutant viruses that produced immunosuppression and an array of infectious diseases.
In the early 1970s, scientists had isolated specific enzymes and other biochemical processes that induced collapse of the immune system. Research at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) was focused mostly on the sarcoma-leukemia cancer model where immunosuppression, cancer, and death were induced by DNA and RNA manipulation. In some experiments, DNA in simian monkey viruses was commonly replaced with cat leukemia and chicken sarcoma RNA. Dr. Robert Gallo, a top AIDs researcher, used viruses from simian monkeys and mice to insert cancer-causing RNA into human white blood cells.
Dr. Horowitz traced the development of AIDS-like viruses to the mega-military contractor Litton Industries. Litton was the principle supplier of simian monkeys to NCI’s 12 cancer research centers, all located in the “United States”. Litton was also the sixth highest paid biological weapons contractor for the U.S. Army.
AIDS Statistical Risk is One in Five Million to One in Fifty Million
Most heterosexuals in the united states of America face a very slim chance of getting AIDS, but that is not what D.C. wants the people to know. As reported in The Wall Street Journal, federal U.S. government officials began a nationwide disinformation campaign in 1987, suggesting that AIDS was becoming an epidemic in the general population. A similar campaign of duplicity occurred in Britain as revealed by the London Times.
In fact, federal U.S. government officials knew that the risks of getting AIDS were largely confined to predominately gay men, intravenous drug users, their sex partners and their newborn children. U.S. government officials proceeded with an extensive “disinformation” campaign anyway, likely out of fear that the public might not support increased funding for AIDS research if heterosexuals did not believe they were at risk.
For most heterosexuals, the AIDS risk from a single sex act was one in five million without the use of a condom, and one in 50 million for those who used condoms – much smaller than the risk of getting hit by lightning.
Scientific journals later that published findings confirming there was no spread of the AIDS virus into the heterosexual population were suppressed. The government’s “disinformation” campaign suppressed respectable evidence challenging the entire AIDS theory, including those of Nobel Prize winning scientists.
Why We May Never Read the Book on AIDS?
HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS, according to Dr. Peter Duesberg, a virologist at the University of California (Berkeley). Dr. Duesberg, a scientist of international stature, was credited with defining retroviruses.
His research revealed that HIV was highly over rated as a killer. His theory holds that co-factors, especially drugs used to manage the disease, are the actual killers. About 200 doctors and researchers are coming up with similar conclusions. He even injected HIV infected blood into his own veins to prove his point.
Bryan J. Ellison, one of Dr. Duesberg’s graduate students, wrote a book called, Why We Will Never Win the War on AIDS (1994)? However, it was not available to read for years because a Federal Judge, John E. Sprizzo granted an injunction to halt publication of the book and ordered all existing copies destroyed. Why would the government engage is such blatant “censorship” over a book on HIV/AIDS?
Ellison decided to print 20,000 on his own after he had signed a contract with Alfred J. Regenry. Apparently, Regenry was the second publisher to agree to print the book and then change their minds. What is the government hiding and why would they go to such effort to suppress the truth about HIV/AIDS?
Poisoning the People With Fluoride
The corporate “State” has the police power to add a “toxic substance” to drinking water without violating the rights of its citizens, according to the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bellasai v. Cuyahoga Falls.
The California State legislature supports the practice. The legislature passed a “statute”, not a constitutional law, “mandating” the fluoridation of drinking water in over 90% of the state’s municipal water systems.
The Public Health Service has been endorsing the use of fluoride for years and has its credibility and funding to consider. Apparently, Adolf Hitler put fluoride in the drinking water to make the Jews docile before marching them into the gas chambers.
But isn’t fluoride good for you? After all, no child should be deprived of fluoride, should they? On the contrary, according to John Yiamouyiannis, Ph.D, president of the Safe Water Foundation, “The chronic administration of fluoride in water takes its toll on human health and life…Fluoride in water increases risk of hip fracture, cancer, dental fluorosis and other harmful effects.” Because of his deeply held belief, Yiamouyiannis spearheaded a campaign to ban fluoride from water systems in California. Why allow the poisoning of 39 million people anyway?
Here is some of the back story. Petrochemical and steel corporations regularly spew tons of fluorides into the atmosphere and they would lose billions of dollars if fluoride were widely identified as the poison it is.
The biggest winners would be the chemical fertilizer industry as they generate the fluoride that gets dumped in water supplies. Fluoride must be removed from phosphate fertilizer before it is applied to crops, lest they die. The toxic substance has to be put somewhere. Hence, Dr. Yiamouyiannis may have coined the phrase, “The solution to pollution is dilution.”
So why not take that toxic waste, then make a profit on its sale state water suppliers and toothpaste companies?
War on Food, GMO’s and Humanity
A Genetically Modified Organism (GMO) is any organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques that “do not occur naturally by mating or natural recombination”. A huge variety of organisms have been Genetically-Modified (GM), from animals to plants and microorganisms. Now, there are dozens, if not hundreds, of GM food products distributed worldwide except where prohibited.
Objections were frequently raised over the development of GMO crops, particularly their commercialization and whether food produced from them is safe and what impact growing them has on the environment. Other concerns include the contamination of non-genetically modified crops, control of the food supply, patenting of life and the misuse of intellectual property rights. Those activists who raised these concerns were harassed by Monsanto, absorbed by Bayer in 2018, who is the world’s largest producer of GMO patented seeds.
GMO food safety and labeling were two of the many leading issues with critics. Countries have adopted some regulatory measures to deal with these concerns with some of the most marked differences occurring between the United States and Europe. Many countries, especially in Europe, have banned GMO crops entirely.
Genetically-Modified Humans
U.S. President Trump’s Operation Warp Speed (OWS) brought to market two mRNA products by Pfizer and Moderna, plus one DNA product, by Johnson and Johnson. Vaccine manufacturer Novavax, introduced NanoFlu, a combined COVID-19/flu jab for trial.
These Big Pharma products were labeled as “vaccines”for marketing purposes and for full indemnity from lawsuits that Big Pharma is privileged to enjoy against injuries and deaths that their products cause. These so-called “vaccines”, or “jabs”, were an entirely new type of genetic experiment, inadequately tested for safety or efficacy, that may permanently alter the human genome for those who took the “jabs” for generations to come, if they are still able to remain fertile and conceive children.
The injection of the novel gene-altering “jab” caused massive biological harm and wide-spread deaths according to both EU Yellow Card and US VAERS death reports. Even official sources were forced to admit that since the introduction of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) jabs, more people died from injecting the “jab” than from COVID-19.
It was no surprise that COVID-19 jabbed individuals became infected with COVID-19 again, though this was conveniently blamed on a concocted “variants” such as Delta?
References:
Quote from Dr. Herbert Ley, Former U.S. FDA Commissioner.
Wikipedia | Jonathan Wright (his health clinic was raided by the FDA at gunpoint to confiscate mega vitamins) FDA to Assume New Powers July 1 by Jonathan Collin, M.D., Townsend Letter for Doctors, July 1994, p.687 (specifies the FDA police powers); Constitutional Freedom and The End of Health Freedom with the Hatch Bill and GATT Bill Interface interview with Suzanne Harris by Patrick von Mauck, National Health Federation, Health Freedom News (Nov-Dec. 1994).
PerceptionsMagazine (Nov ’96, p.76); Duluth Reader | Why you cannot trust the FDA, WHO, DCD, AAP, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Pfizer?; Liberty International Blog
Wikipedia | Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Rebranded as “Comirnaty”.
Wikipedia | Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Rebranded as “SpikeVax”.
RT.com | Vaccine-maker Novavax kicks off trial for combined Covid-19/flu jab.
Childrens Health Defense | Leaked Document Reveals ‘Shocking’ Terms of Pfizer’s International Vaccine Agreements; Wikipedia | Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in the U.S. in 2005.
Ibid. | Vaccine Impact | By August 2, 2021, the European Union database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, with 20,595 fatalities, and 1,960,607 injuries, following COVID-19 injections.
Natural News | COVID-19 positive patients who were already vaccinated were told the type of “variant” they were infected with cannot be legally disclosed. In actuality, none of the “variants” have been isolated or identified. Once again, Big Pharma and their doctor servants were lying to us.
Source:Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3,p.243 – 251
ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!
Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition) (3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!
Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom (3rd Edition) (Printed, Bound Book or PDF)
This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!
The Sovereign's Handbook by Johnny Liberty 