09. Short History of the Income Tax | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 19, 2025January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) requires “withholding” from employee’s income as an economic mechanism to mitigate the damage from spiraling inflation, while concealing currency devaluation. In addition “withholding” keeps your hard-earned Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) out of circulation so you cannot spend them as disposable income. The contemporary “income tax” system, as bizarre as it is, is an essential component of the Western debt-based central banking system.

By keeping Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) out of circulation through “withholding”, economic controls are more effective. By maintaining employee net income as near to subsistence as possible, the Citizen is effectively prevented from engaging in meaningful political activity to threaten the global elite’s monopoly over the political, economic and legal systems.

First Income Tax for Federal Employees

During the American Civil War, the first version of an “income tax” was implemented for federal U.S. government employees only, and once again after the corporate income tax was repealed. The U.S. Congress have been taxing the incomes of federal U.S. government employees since 1861.

Second Income Tax for Corporations

The second version on the income tax was a corporate tax introduced concurrently with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 to off-set the debt incurred by the federal U.S. government corporation to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB). This was yet another attempt to impose a direct tax on wages.

The U.S. Congress authorized a “voluntary” income tax in 1913 for corporate “persons”, under the very popular guise of “soaking the rich for the sake of the poor”. The income tax for corporations was promulgated simultaneously with the alleged ratification of the 16th Amendment. It was repealed by the Internal Revenue Act (Nov. 23, 1921).

At this juncture, a surtax on individuals was implemented to offset the corporate income tax. These taxes, which became known as income taxes via the Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, were issued against the government returns for public officials.

Income Tax Goes Directly to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)

Before online banking and electronic fund transfers, we wrote paper checks to pay bills and our “income taxes”. If you noticed the stamp on the back of your cashed check from the IRS, you would have noticed that your check payment was endorsed by the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), not the U.S. Treasury or the IRS.

As we stated previously, the Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984) concluded that not one dime of your hard-earned tax money goes to pay for government services. All “income tax” payments service the interest only on the federal/national “debt (Ø)”.

All “income tax” collected goes to service an un-payable federal/national “debt (Ø)”, and is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated upon the We the People.

Since we have already asserted that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) via the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) is a primary principal/creditor of the federal U.S. government corporation, any “income tax” received would be directly routed to the principal-creditor – just like any other bankrupt entity. This is additional prima facie evidence of the bankruptcy of the federal U.S. government corporation.

“The greatest challenge our tax system faces in the 1990s is to ease the burden on taxpayers. Once people conclude that it is too difficult, too time consuming, too expensive to comply, many will stop complying.”
~ Fred Goldberg, IRS Commissioner

Apportionment as Rule of Law

The IRS has no lawful or delegated authority to assess and collect income taxes. The original U.S. Constitution strictly forbade the federal U.S. government from imposing any “direct” tax upon individuals.

The U.S. Congress could, however apportion direct taxes to a state, but not to the individuals within the state. A capitation means a “head tax”, “poll tax”, “per capita tax” or direct “income tax”, and is not permitted, unless equally apportioned to each state. This is the apportionment rule of law.

“No capitation, or other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census
or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.”
~ U.S. Constitution [1:9:4]

“Representatives and direct taxes shall be
apportioned among the several States
which may be included within the Union
to their respective members…”
~ U.S. Constitution [1:2:3]

These original sections of the U.S. Constitution have never been repealed or lawfully amended, and the 16th Amendment, as passed, is invalid. The U.S. Constitution still today forbids direct taxation of individuals.

“Any direct tax that is not apportioned is unlawful.”
~ Commissioner v. Obear-Nester, 349 U.S.948 (1954)

Our Founders intentionally limited the taxing powers of the federal U.S. government so as to keep it small. “[the federal government] has no authority to raise either [men or money] by regulations extending to the individual [state] Citizens of America.”

Apportionment can be a protective shield against direct taxation for all sovereign “state” Citizens providing you are “domiciled” in one of the 48 sovereign states, and not a resident (or franchisee) of the federal United States.

16th Amendment Created No New Taxing Powers

The Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) claims the 16th Amendment gives them the constitutional authority to impose and collect direct taxes, despite the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the 16th Amendment created no new power of taxation, thus, did not amend or change the constitutional limitations forbidding direct taxation on individuals.

Additionally, as can be shown, the 16th Amendment (1913) was never lawfully ratified by the sovereign “states” of the Union.

16th Amendment Improperly Ratified

According to The Law That Never Was, authors Red Beckman and Bill Benson traveled to all the State Capitols to obtain certified copies of the official voting records of the thirty-six states that allegedly ratified the 16th Amendment.

By careful accounting, thirty-two states had committed grievous departures from acceptable procedure during the ratification process. In the official canvas of the first nineteen (19) Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. President’s signature is glaringly missing from the 16th Amendment. This is another story in a long history of frauds perpetrated upon We the People.

The real purpose for the 16th Amendment was to create a smoke screen, making it appear that constitutional restrictions on direct taxing had been abolished. But once the smoke had cleared, the Citizens would soon forget and the income tax would further encroach upon the assets and rights of the people who ever increasingly pay tribute to the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) and their foreign principals-creditors.

“The Congress shall have the power to lay
and collect taxes on incomes,
from whatever source derived, without
apportionment among the several states,
and without regard to any
census or enumeration.”
~ 16th Amendment

Third Income Tax For Appointed and Elected Government Officials Engaged in Business

The current Subtitle A tax and Subtitle C Social Security and related taxes have never applied to anyone other than appointed and elected government officials engaged in United States trade or business (defined at IRC §7701(a)(26)).

Victory Taxes After WWII

The U.S. Congress did not make the income tax “mandatory” until World War II, when a “victory tax” was imposed on “wages” as an “National Emergency” measure to help pay for the war. In contrast, both before and after World War II, “wages” were not subject to federal income taxes.

The U.S. Congress morphed the “victory tax” into the modern version of the “income tax” a few years after WWII to finance the Cold War debt, the rising military-industrial complex, and foreign-aid corporate programs to other developing countries.

No Direct Tax, Wages Are Not Income

Because many of the “citizens of the United States” weren’t paying attention after World War II, as many are today, We the People did not realize that the federal U.S. government could not constitutionally impose any direct “income tax” on their wages or property. They assumed that “wages” were income; thus, they volunteered to be taxed. Once again, Citizens swallowed a fraud and a hoax, and were left confused and holding the bag.

Several federal courts have ruled that states are prohibited from imposing an indirect tax upon an unalienable right (no sales tax on food items). Your right to work is an unalienable right and many states have right to work laws whereby the government cannot license or tax your right to work in the profession of your choice.

According to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), “wages” are not taxable because they are not defined as “income”.

What is Taxable Income or Gain?

A lawful tax liability is created from an increase or gain in the value of property, not from gross income, providing you are a person required to file and report.

Where income from private enterprise is defined as property, it is generally exempt from direct tax under fundamental law. “Wages”, salary and other returns from public service are deemed to be privileged, commercial enterprises due to government-granted benefits, thus, are considered to be taxable. In other words, the “income tax” is nothing more than an excise tax levied against privileges and benefits derived from federal government service.

Income is Defined in the IRC in the Same Light as a Schedule C, Standard Business Calculation

David Myrland’s Our Uncle, Our Problem demonstrates that IRC § 7701(e) (contract for lease of property) relative to IRC §83 calculations (of the fair market value) and IRC §1011, 1012, 1014 (adjusted basis of property transferred) confirms this.

GROSS INCOME (minus) EXPENSES = INCOME (PROFIT or GAIN)
or INCREASE OF VALUE

In calculating “gross income”, 26 USC §83 applies to all compensation for services. §1.83-4(b)(2) requires that the cost of compensation for services is to be figured by applying the provisions of §1012 and the regulations hereunder.

Regarding 26 USC §83 calculations, ask these questions. Where, under §1012, is the exclusion of intangible personal property, such as labor, from property that is to be treated as a cost?

Which specific provisions exclude my compensation from the provisions of §83? How am I to comply with the provisions and requirements of §83?

As an independent contractor or employee, does §83 allow the taxation of the fair market value of services, received as a fee or wage?

Labor is Property, Not Taxable Income

If you are selling your labor to an employer, then labor is your property. Your labor is your property, therefore not taxable. If you are exchanging labor for a paycheck, then zero gain = zero tax. This is the same as if you are breaking even, not making a “profit”.

The same calculation applies for both cash or bartered exchanges. The entire income tax code has nothing to do whatsoever with “wages”, but “profit”, “gain” and “increase” in value.

NO INCOME = NO INCOME TAX
NO PROFIT = NO GAIN

As an “employee”, you are not even required to keep books and records.

“Compensation for labor (wages) cannot be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit’ …means the gain made upon any business or investment – a different thing altogether from mere
compensation for labor (wages).” ~ Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992 (1955)

“[The IRS] taxes only income ‘derived’ from many different [U.S.] sources; one does not ‘derive income’ by rendering services and charging for them.”
~ Edwards v. Keith, 231 F.110

References:

Wikipedia | Internal Revenue Act of 1921, §213, pp.237 and 238; IRC of 1954, §3401(c), people identified as “employees” amended in 1986].
Cornell Law | United States v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 233, 56 S.Ct. 223, 80 L.Ed 233 (1935).
GovInfo | U.S. Government Manual, p.794, 1995/96 edition.
Wikipedia | Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984); Free At Last by N.A. Scott, Ph.D., D.D., pp.2-5; Family Guardian | Confirms the allegation that the income tax revenues go 100% to pay the interest on the national debt and not a single nickel of it goes to the government; Citizens Against Government Waste
Wikipedia | Fred Goldberg, IRS Commissioner.
Wikipedia | U.S. Constitution [1:9:4]; Limits on Federal Power.
Wikipedia | U.S. Constitution [1:2:3]; House of Representatives.
Court Listener | Commissioner v. Obear-Nester, 217 F.2d 56 (7th Cir 1954).
Founders Archives | The Federalist Paper #15 by Alexander Hamilton, Modern Library.
Justia | Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1 (1916).
The Law That Never Was | The Law That Never Was by Red Beckman and Bill Benson; Amazon; Senate Document 240. Regarding the supposed ownership of the IRS; Pandora’s Box by Alexander Christopher, p.523 (IRS is owned by R.E. Harrington Insurance Company of England which had its roots in the original Virginia Company that colonized the southern part of the USA) www.archive.org/details/PandorasBoxAlexChristopher1993
Cornell Law | 16^th Amendment, U.S. Constitution.
Javelin Press | Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party (Javelin Press, Austin, Texas, 1992) (income tax is for public employees).
Congressional Record | Congressional Record for March 27, 1943, p.2580.
Citation Needed | Our Uncle, Our Problem by David Myrland. regarding IRC §7701(e) (contract for lease of property) relative to IRC §83 calculations (of the fair market value) and IRC §§1011, 1012, 1014 (adjusted basis of property transferred).
Ibid.
Javelin Press | Goodbye April 15th by Boston T. Party (Javelin Press, Austin, Texas, 1992) (wages are not taxable as income).
Justia | Oliver v. Halstead, 196 Va. 992 (1955); People ex rel. Thomas B. Needles, Auditor, 90 Ill. 166. “Reasonable compensation for labor or services rendered is not profit.” Laureldale Cemetery Association Matthews, 354 Pa. 239, 47 A.(2d) 277; The word “profit” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary (3rd ed.) as “The advance in the price of goods sold beyond the cost of purchase. The gain made by the sale of produce or manufactures, after deducting the value of the labor, materials, rents, and all expenses, together with the interest of the capital employed.” There is a clear distinction between “profit” and “wages” or compensation for labor. “Compensation for labor can not be regarded as profit within the meaning of the law. The word ‘profit’, as ordinarily used, means the gain made upon any business or investment — a different thing altogether from mere compensation for labor.”
Case Law Vlex | Edwards v. Keith, 231 F.110 (2nd Cir 1916).

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.85 – 90

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

09. Individual Master File (IMF) | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 19, 2025January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

As if this bizarre scheme to collect taxes is not convoluted enough, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS), apparently limited is in its legitimate ability to tax Citizens directly, has contrived an incredible scam of imposing excise taxes based not on income or gain, not with jurisdiction or delegation of authority, but due to a specific taxable activity beyond the scope of the U.S. Constitution, such as: “operating an offshore oil well, importing drugs from the Cayman Islands, or dealing in gasoline used in school buses”.

We admit this conclusion seems far-fetched, virtually impossible to believe, but there appears to be evidence to support this presumption. Imagine that in order to impose excise taxes directly on Citizens, the IRS has been intentionally mis-classifying 95% of all taxpayers as involved in some excise taxable activity light-years removed from any sense of reality.

Ludicrous, as it may seem, the Individual Master File (IMF), or Business Master File (BMF), of each individual or business taxpayer has a series of “industry activity codes”. If decoded they reveal excise taxable activity that creates a false liability to pay excise taxes. Simply stated, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) has systematically falsified the file of every taxpayer “U.S. citizen” to create a basis for tax liability.

The IRS is primarily a record management agency. Every administrative action taken by the IRS is designed to settle the record in favor of assessment and collection.

As a remedy for frustrated taxpayers, addressing the falsehoods in the IMF or BMF with a request to correct the record may stop the assessment and collection activity altogether. Request a complete copy of your IMF and the corresponding decoding book may be a valuable tax reduction strategy.

IRS Classifies Some Taxpayers Narcotics Dealers

“When Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests have been filed for an Individual Master File (IMF) for people who are experiencing tax problems with the IRS, every return has been found to contain the above codes except for some which are coded as ‘Guam’ returns. Every return shows that the unsuspecting Citizen is being taxed on income derived from importing narcotics, alcohol, tobacco, or firearms into the United States, or one of its territories or possessions, from a foreign country or from Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, or into the Virgin Islands from the Cayman Islands.”

IRS Venue and Statute of Limitations

There are no regulations published in the Federal Register which extend Internal Revenue Code (IRC) authority to the state republics for establishing federal internal revenue districts (26 USC §7621).

There is no regulatory authority extending jurisdiction of the Department of the Treasury to the state republics (26 USC §7801). There are no regulations extending authority of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to the state republics and the population at large (26 USC §7802).

Tom Dunn of Maine claims to have documented that judges of the “United States” participate in this international scam by way of the Capital Trust Corporation in the District of Columbia (D.C.), by way of an offshore trust linked with the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS).

If the international connection can be shown, the assertion that the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) collects for an undisclosed foreign principal/creditor can be proven, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) represents an undisclosed, foreign “Central Authority”, which appears to be an international long-arm of the hidden Global Power structure.

The general authority statute for the Department of Justice (DOJ) is 28 USC §516. In U.S. v. Mattison, C.A. 9 (Mont.) 1979, 600 F.2d 1295, the court stated that 28 USC §516 was a general housekeeping statute and that the authority of the Department of Justice (DOJ) must be prescribed by a statute specific to an offense.

IRS Tax Protester Types

Here are a few IRS classifications of tax protesters which they claim use “frivolous tax arguments”:

(1) A tax protester is a person who employs one or more illegal schemes that affect the payment of taxes.

(2) The following are schemes used by illegal tax protesters:

(a) Constitutional basis.

(b) Fair Market Value.

(d) Blank IRS Form 1040/1040A.

(e) Non-Payment Protest.

(f) Protest Adjust.

(g) Mail Order Ministries.

(h) Protester Letters and Cards.

(i) Family Estate Trust.

The trusts are filed on IRS Form 1041. Terms such as “family”, “pure”, “prime”, and “constitutional” are used in the title of the trust. Income is from “wages”or “contract”sources and deductions are for personal living expenses, such as housing, medical, auto, child care, interest or taxes. Generally, an individual will establish a trust and give his-her wages or other income to the trust. Then the trust pays for the expenses of the individual. The expenses claimed as administrative expenses of the trust, result in the individual paying no tax and the trust paying little or no tax.

Individual Income Tax as Excise Tax

The individual “income tax” prescribed in Subtitle A of the Internal Re-Venue Code (IRC) is an excise tax levied for the privilege of working for the federal government. The tax is mandatory only for officers, agents and employees of the United States agencies, and officers of United States corporations (26 USC §3401(c)and(d). The tax is otherwise voluntary (26 USC §3402 (p).

Yet the IRS, with full cooperation of state and federal courts, United States attorneys, and Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys routinely assails the “citizens of the United States” by way of administrative edicts, seizures, etc., and both civil and criminal prosecution.

The study of IRS generated Individual Master Files (IMF) demonstrates that many lawsuits for tax collection are premised on coding which classifies the alleged taxpayer as being involved in illegal drug trafficking via the Virgin Islands and/or other off-shore jurisdictions.

People expert in IRS document decoding may be among those presenting testimony to the grand jury.

“In order to avoid open hostilities,
it is necessary to move evidence into
proper legal forums so there can be
peaceful remedies that minimize
danger and damage.”
~ Dan Meador

References:

Wikipedia | Individual Master File (IMF); Archives | Request for Records Disposition Authority; The Matrix Has You | Individual Master File (IMF) Decoding by Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry (SEDM); Family Guardian | Obtaining and Analyzing Your IMF; Family Guardian | 12 Deposition Questions; Legal Beagle | How to Access the IMF from the IRS?
Sourced from Veritas Magazine.
Cornell Law | 28 USC §516: Tax Refund Case www.law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/273/13/455842
Wikipedia | Tax Protester History; Family Guardian | IRS Tax Protester Handbook for Training Agents; Internal Re-Venue Service | IRS Frivolous Arguments.
Cornell Law | 26 USC §3401(c)and(d); Cornell Law | 26 USC §3402 ℗.
Quote by Dan Meador; Family Guardian | The Great Income Tax Hoax: Why We Don’t Owe Income Tax by Dan Meador, an excellent brief on the history of the Internal Re-Venue Service.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.83 – 85

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

09. What is the Internal Re-Venue Service? | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 19, 2025January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

In the simplest terms, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) is a private collection agency for the Federal Reserve Bank on behalf of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which is a principal/creditor of the perpetually bankrupt federal U.S. government corporation. Of course, this courageous assertion is taboo to even discuss, let alone bring into the light, in these times.

IRS Authority

As a record management agency, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) presumes authority over all Citizens to assess and collect federal income taxes from any source derived.

As may be shown in the following, this has been a monumental fraud which has been perpetrated upon We the People for over one-hundred and ten years while the U.S. Congress, U.S. President and U.S. Supreme Court, with few exceptions, have all gone along for the ride.

Please consider all three historically convoluted lines of legal construction detailed as follows. Afterward, we would imagine that any intelligent and thoughtful individual would only conclude that the IRS is a massive con game foisted upon the ignorance, complacency and fear of the people.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Firstly, the original office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, created by the Revenue Act of 1862 (12 Stat 432), was in the Treasury Department. However this office was effectively abolished with promulgation of the Revised Statutes of the United States 1873.

The current office of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (IRC §7802), is not in the Treasury of the United States (Treasury Department). Instead, it is in the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico.

In the early part of the 19th century, provisional governments for the Philippines and Puerto Rico, operating chiefly under supervision of the Navy, established entities known as the Bureau of Internal Revenue.

The first by way of Philippines Trust #2 (internal revenue), the second by way of Puerto Rico Trust #62 (Internal Revenue). When the Philippines became an independent commonwealth in 1946, only one of these trusts remained. The Secretary of the Treasury still administers this trust.

National Prohibition and 18th Amendment Repealed by 21st Amendment

Secondly, when the 18th Amendment effecting national prohibition was ratified in 1919, it granted concurrent state and federal authority relating to the production and distribution of distilled spirits.

However, the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th in 1933 and effectively terminated federal police powers. The Federal Alcohol Commission was enacted in 1935. However, it never got off the ground due to the Constantine case.

Functions of the Federal Alcohol Commission were merged with the Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico, not the Internal Re-Venue Service as we know it in the united states of America today.

Bureau of Internal Revenue Morphed Into Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS)

Thirdly, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) as we know it today did not formally come into existence until the name of the Bureau of Internal Revenue was changed to the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) via Treasury Department Order (T.D.O.) #150-29 in 1953.

The fact that the U.S. Congress never created a Bureau of internal Revenue is verifiable in the U.S. Department of Treasury history of the United States internal revenue laws.

From 1953 until 1972, the IRS continued to have responsibility for the administration of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms was established and segregated from the IRS via Treasury Order #221, effective July 1, 1972.

The fact that BATF still administers the Federal Alcohol Administration Act is verified at 27 CFR, Part 1.1, and in definition at 27 CFR, Part 1.5, and the solid link with the Department of the Treasury, Puerto Rico, is made by definition at 27 CFR, Part 250.11.

Delegation of Authority

The IRS does not have any legitimate “delegation of authority” at the federal level from the U.S. Congress. Title 26 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) is often cited by the IRS to justify their authority to assess and collect income taxes.

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) authorizes the Treasury Department (Treasury of the United States) to administer internal revenue taxes of the United States in the continental United States, not the Internal Re-Venue Service of the Department of the Treasury.

Title 26, though, never passed as “positive” law, and the implementing statutes are missing. The IRS collection process is legitimate providing that they obey the laws and assess the tax on the proper persons, but the assessment process is a complete and total fraud.

All legitimate delegations of authority at the federal level must be “filed” and “published” in the Federal Register.

The Presidential Reorganization Plan No. 26 of 1950 divested the IRS Commissioner of all authority to enforce the 1939 Internal Revenue Code and vested all such authority to the Secretary of the Treasury. The U.S. Treasury has re-vested to the IRS only the following authority.

“The Commissioner shall, to the extent
of authority otherwise vested in him,
provide for the administration of the
United States Internal Revenue laws
in the U.S. territories and insular possessions
and other authorized areas of the world.”
~ Treasury Order 150-01

The U.S. Congress authorized the President to re-delegate authority to various administrative departments and department heads. Most of the core Executive Order (EO) delegations are published immediately following 3 USC §301 (1994 edition). Where the Secretary of the Treasury is concerned, key Executive Order delegation is EO #10289.

Authority delegated by the U.S. President, so far as “Internal Re-Venue” is concerned, addresses custom laws, particularly with respect to narcotics and related drugs, the anti-smuggling act, other maritime activity, and authority in offshore territories of the “United States” such as Puerto Rico, etc.

No authority relating to internal revenue laws prescribed in Subtitles A and C of the Internal Revenue Code is mentioned. That EO #10289 is the authority for the Secretary of the Treasury to establish revenue districts is verified at 26 CFR §301.7621-1.

In the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules, located in the index of the Code of Federal Regulations, reveals that the authority to establish revenue districts does not apply to the Union of sovereign states of the republic, as parties to the U.S. Constitution.

The Secretary of the Treasury in turn delegated authority to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue by way of Treasury Department Order (T.D.O.) #150-42, effected July 27, 1956 (Federal Register, pg., 5852).

Therefore, we find no authority cited for any delegation of authority in the Union of sovereign states of the republic.

“The Commissioner shall, to the extent
of authority vested in him,
provide for the administration
of the United States Internal Revenue laws in
the Panama Canal Zone, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands.”
~ Treasury Department Order 150-42

“No inference, implication or presumption
of legislative construction shall be drawn
or made by reason of the location of grouping
of any particular section
or provision or portion of this Title [26],
nor shall any table of contents,
table of cross references, or similar outline,
analysis or descriptive matter
relating to the contents of this Title
be given any legal effect.”
~ 26 USC Section 7806(b)

In summary, these three historical lines demonstrate the most bizarre and convoluted income tax scheme ever legally perpetrated against a developed nation.

References:

Wikipedia | Revenue Act of 1862, 12 Stat 432.
Wikipedia | Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Cornell Law | Internal Revenue Code.
Cornell Law | Trust Funds. 31 USC §1321.
Census | 21st Amendment repealed the 18th and terminated federal police powers; Federal Alcohol Commission enacted, but did not get off the ground.
1215 | Who and What is the IRS? by Dan Meador (April 1, 2000) and B.A.T.F. ? IRS Criminal Fraud by William Cooper; Federal Alcohol Commission merged with Bureau of Internal Revenue, Puerto Rico; Family Guardian | The Great Income Tax Hoax: Why We Don’t Owe Income Tax by Dan Meador.
§1111.2 in Internal Revenue Manual 1100, published variously in the Federal Register, particularly at 36 F.R. No. 12, for Tuesday, Jan 19, 1971, at page 850.
Cornell Law | 26 USC §7701(a)(12)(A) and at §7805(a).
Wikipedia | Administrative Procedures Act of 1946 in 5 USC §552(a) with 60 Statutes at Large 237 at Ch. 324; Codified in 26 CFR 1.6001-1, 1.6011-1 and 1.6012-1 (all delegations of authority must be filed and published in the Federal Register www.federalregister.gov; Records www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.6001-1 and General Requirement of a Return www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.6011-1 and Individuals Required to Make Returns www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.6012-1; International Tax Technologies (IRS has no delegated authority).
U.S. Treasury | Treasury Department Order 150-10 (April 22, 1982).
Note: Re-Venue means to shift the “venue” from one location or place to another. It has become synonymous with “income” or the intake of funds.
Cornell Law | EO #10280. 26 CFR §301.7621-1. (Sep 17, 1951); 21 Fed Reg, p.5852 (7/27/56) (no longer can be found).
51 Fed Reg. pg 9571 (2/27/86) (no longer can be found).
Cornell Law | 26 USC §7806(b).
Family Guardian | The Great Income Tax Hoax: Why We Don’t Owe Income Tax by Dan Meador, an excellent brief on the history of the Internal Re-Venue Service.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.77 – 80

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

09. Government Without Taxes and Tyranny | Social Security & Taxation | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 17, 2025January 18, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

“Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible;
He is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the treasury.
There is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.

Over and over again the Courts have said that there is nothing sinister in so arranging affairs as to keep taxes as low as possible. Everyone does it, rich and poor alike and all do right, for nobody owes any public duty to pay more than the law demands.”
~ U.S. Appellate Justice Learned Hand

When are We the People going to wake up and choose freedom? When will we decide to elect a representative government legislating what is best for all the people, instead of only an elite few?

How much longer will we work long and hard, then pay a huge share of our day-to-day productivity in taxes to a corrupt government that lies, robs, oppresses and abuses its own people? Can you even imagine a government without income taxes, without tyranny, and without threats to fund its necessarily limited operations?

Furthermore, we realize that it is for some reason taboo to talk about or question the origin and current legitimacy of the “income tax” and the authority of the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) as it applies to sovereign “state” Citizens. Thus, be aware, the following information may be hazardous to your preconceptions!

Cost of Government

According to the Cost of Government website in 2013 (now defunct), taxpaying “U.S. citizens” worked from January 1 – July 13, just to pay their “fair share” of various “taxes”. Compared to the size of the national economy, the cost of government makes up 53% of annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP). As if four seasons were not enough, there now exists a “tax season”.

Can you imagine giving yourself and your family an annual raise by de-taxing from the federal U.S. government corporation and its political subdivisions, the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) and the “tax-and-spend”politicians who are destroying this once great nation by continuously bankrupting us into economic slavery?

“…Those who wish to stake their claim to sovereignty, to make a personal record, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America, that they are not ‘taxpayers’ under the IRC and, as to property not emanating from an employment agreement within the U.S. government, declare that they are not ‘transferees’ under the IRC, thereby putting IRS employees on notice that no lawful authority exists to pursue [income taxes].” ~ Frank Kowalik, IRS Humbug

Duty and Moral Responsibility

American Nationals, sovereign “state” Citizens, U.S. citizens and private-sector employers have a duty and a moral obligation to not pay one dime of income taxes more than legally required.

If you understood how income tax money was spent, solely to pay interest on an un-payable national/federal debt, you might choose to simply refuse to pay “income tax” on the grounds of “social conscience” as many tax protestors have done in the past.

Settled law from a constitutional and historical perspective, if examined “Without Prejudice”, is solidly on the side of the American National or sovereign “state” Citizen with regards to the legality of the “income tax”, despite the perpetuation of this monumental fraud upon the people since its inception in 1913.

No Authority for a Direct Tax

In 1791, under the U.S. Constitution and “Common law” of the land, the federal U.S. government was forbidden to borrow money, or delegate the authority to create money, or impose a direct tax upon the Citizens of the states of the Union.

Prior to 1913, when the federal U.S. government needed money to finance a war or build a government project, it either had to sell U.S. Savings Bonds directly to the sovereign “state” Citizens, or get approval from the state legislatives to “apportion” a tax to raise the necessary funds. This kept the federal U.S. government accountable to both the people and the state legislatures which resulted in a balanced budget and fewer wars.

Today, with the advent of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS), and the alleged ratifications of the 16th Amendment and 17th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, those original checks and balances were eliminated.

Upon closer examination you might discover, that even these constitutional amendments, legislative acts and court decisions did not lawfully expand federal authority to impose a direct tax.

Income Taxes are Unnecessary

Most of the income taxes we pay are unnecessary to sustain the basic, constitutional functions of the U.S. government. According to the Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984), not one dime of your income taxes pays for government services.

U.S. government services are primarily funded through federal excise taxes, imposed upon goods, services, manufacturing, and customs, etc. In fact, we could have quality government services and a balanced budget without an income tax, and without the usury and exploitation inherent in our current tax system.

We the People do not have to live in a socialist/communist government welfare state in order to be capable of providing for a wide range of necessary human needs while taking care of those who honestly cannot provide for themselves.

In the past, families either took care of their own, or private charitable trusts were established to take care of the elderly, orphans, the sick and indigent before the government welfare state existed. It is possible to organize society in a more self-reliant, less government-dependent fashion if only We the People have the will to do so.

Building the Capitol with a Lottery

When the “United States” was a fledgling nation, a country in formation, the first U.S. Capitol Building in Washington D.C. was built with money raised from a lottery, not from taxes.

“The original federal United States government had to build a whole new country
without the ability to tax its citizens.
They built roads, bridges, canals and schools funded to a great extent by lotteries.
In 1793, President George Washington built
Washington, D.C. by selling 50,000 tickets
at $7 each. The top prize
was a hotel worth $50,000.”

Federal / National Debt Proportional to Government Size

Throughout American history we can track the size of the federal U.S. government proportional to the amount of the national/federal debt. It is easy to see that the more debt was incurred, the larger the government became.

We can understand the inherent motivation for the U.S. Congress to approve the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the resulting income tax. The more money the government could borrow, the more power and reach they had over the lives of their Citizens. Thus, politicians have had their fingers in larger and larger shares of the pie for more than one-hundred and ten (110) years.

The federal U.S. government was virtually debt-free with a balanced budget from 1789 to 1860. There was a proportional three-fold increase in the size of both outlays and the government, and five-fold increase in debt between 1861 and 1865 during the American Civil War years.

The outlays and debt stabilized after the American Civil War, and the national/federal debt was paid off between 1866 and 1915. There was a five-fold increase in size of both outlays and government, and a two-fold increase in debt between 1916 and 1920, the beginning of World War I.

As is evident, wars were great excuses for an increase in spending, but also an increase in the size of the government. Private and public banking interests were always increasing their profit-margins and expanding their power during wars. This trend continues unabated to the present.

After the undeclared federal U.S. bankruptcy of 1933, larger outlays and debt increased by unprecedented, exponential magnitude through the present day. As you now understand the larger the federal U.S. government, the larger the debt burden for its Citizens. If we wish to reduce the national/federal debt and balance the budget, even if it were possible in a fiat money system, we must shrink both the size and outlays of the government. Any other approach is wishful thinking and foolishness.

Curiously, the amount of federal aid to state governments decreased by 80% from 1970 to 1990. Federal spending on aid to the states increased from $286 billion in fiscal 2000 to an estimated $449 billion in fiscal 2007. This is the third largest item in the federal budget after Social Security and National Defense. The number of different aid programs for the states soared from 463 in 1990, to 653 in 2000, then to 814 by 2006.

The state governments have grown accustomed to funding from federal aid programs. However, by doing so, they limit their state sovereignty and independence. Every federal aid program comes with terms and conditions which the states must abide by to receive the funding.

When government services and federal benefits are cut on the congressional budget floor, both the Citizens and the states are left holding the bag of all federal debt obligations to the central banks.

There are sound money alternatives to continuing large, centralized, big government “borrow and spend” policies that will inevitably bankrupt We the People and bind us with the chains of economic slavery. We the People must liberate ourselves from economic and political tyranny and apply the necessary intelligence to transform the government at all levels.

References:

Wikipedia | U.S. Appellate Court Justice Learned Hand.
FEE | The Hidden Cost of Government; Marotta on Money | How Much Does Government Cost?; Tax Foundation | Taxes: The Price We pay for Government.
Family Guardian | 1918 Gross Income First Defined from IRS Humbug: Weapons of Enslavement by Frank Kowalik; Amazon
Internal Re-Venue Service | The Agency, It’s Mission and Statutory Authority; Library Guides Louisiana Law | Tax Policy and Procedure: Hierarchy of Tax Authorities; Citation Needed | Show Me The Law.
Wikipedia | Grace Commission Report on Government Waste (1984); Free At Last by N.A. Scott, Ph.D., D.D., pp.2-5.
Wikipedia | Washington D.C.; Citizens for Sovereignty (defunct).
Wikipedia | History of Public Debt; World Almanac and Book of Facts, Phanos Books (1992) p. 139, 153 www.worldalmanac.com; Financial Management, US Department of Treasury; Cato Institute | Federal Aid to States.
World Population Review | Federal aid to states in 2022.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 2 of 3, p.68 – 71

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

06. Banking On The New World Order | New World Order / Deep State | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 8, 2022January 20, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

National I.D. Cards and Tracking

The federal U.S. government corporation informally accepted the Social Security Number (SSN) as a “National Identity Card” along with the new USA Passport with an e-chip. The State-issued driver’s license serves as a backup ID for many non-federal purposes.

In the works, is a Digital Bank ID card with government cryptocurrency to further centralize a Global ID system to track purchases and travel along with a reward and punishment “social credit” system that rolled out in China in 2020 and Canada in 2022.

The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 enabled the U.S. Secret Service to create profiles of potential assassins, and the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) to create a Debtor Master File listing nearly one million people who allegedly still owed money to various government agencies.

“Give me your social security number and I can find out anything about you.” ~ IRS Agent, Retired

The Tax Reform Act of 1986 requires all children be assigned Social Security Numbers (SSNs) by “enumeration at birth” programs. This was accomplished under Threat, Duress and Coercion (TDC) without the voluntary consent of the parents at the hospital after delivering the baby.

Hospitals told parents they could not leave the hospital without getting a SSN. Having your baby at home is a better option if you do not want to be forced to receive a SSN through this program.

For taxpayers, failure to getting SSNs for your children may result in the loss of dependent deductions for tax purposes and welfare programs. All real estate transactions must be reported to the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) by both the seller and broker, if a real estate broker is involved. A private sale is a better option.

A National IRS database lists every homeowner in the United States. If you move, you are supposed to notify the DMV or IRS within 10-45 days.

The Bureau of Engraving and Printing called for the creation of a counterfeit-proof currency with a strip that can be electronically tracked. Have you noticed the electronic thread in today’s $20, $50 and $100 bills?

We are moving rapidly toward a “cashless” society with all transactions accounted for with central bank-issued debit/credit cards. This may take a few more years to fully implement. If you are operating a legitimate International Business Corporation (IBC) or a Private Foundation (PF) in a foreign bank, your company can receive a VISA/MC debit card for use in any cash machine in the world. In 2018, there are online systems for multiple currency transactions via any countrie’s ATMs, for example, wise.com.

If you file your Internal Re-Venue (IRS) taxes online, electronic transfers of your IRS-calculated tax returns may be subtracted automatically from your bank account. If the IRS decides you have underpaid for any reason, they can take the funds directly from your bank account.

Estimated income taxes can also be automatically deducted from your bank account on a monthly basis. Do your taxes on old fashioned paper forms and submit by mail whenever possible.Non-Profit Organizations must file their tax returns electronically as of 2022.

The IRS identifies when people buy and sell gold over a specified amount. The broker might require a SSN for the transaction and the seller may report the transaction to the IRS. This could be a first step toward yet another gold confiscation such as FDR did in 1934.

If you have an inventory of gold, silver or precious metals, keep them very private and secured. As a sovereign “state” Citizen, you are not required to hand over your gold silver, or precious metals to the government. As a “U.S. citizen” you are in federal jurisdiction and required to obey every “statute” and Executive Order (EO) of the corporation. That is unless you protest such “mandates”.

On at least three occasions, the federal U.S. government has impounded private stocks of gold — the Revolutionary War, the American Civil War and after the U.S. government’s bankruptcy in 1933. Anti-hoarding laws or Executive Orders (EOs) may be enforced for U.S. citizens stockpiling food, water, medicine, or other survival items.

The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970, or Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), requires all United States banks to maintain copies of all transactions, record the SSN of anyone opening a new account and turn in the name of anyone who fails to provide this information within 45 days to the U.S. Treasury Department. Since 2021, bank transactions greater

Cash deposits greater than $3,000 are reported to the IRS via a Currency Transaction Report (CTR). The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) limits the amount of cash dollars leaving the country to $10,000 USD and makes significant changes in the treatment of foreign bank accounts which must be reported on the tax return. This does not include $10,000 USD in gold, silver or precious metals leaving the country which is calculated on the face value of the coins, not the market value.

The Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS), as a government record-keeping operation and collection agency for the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB), has the authority by contract to snoop into the private financial lives of every “U.S. citizen” hooked into the information grid, then share that information with other federal agencies by request.

The IRS was given new “asset forfeiture” powers to criminal investigation departments, which may delegate their authority to any of tens of thousands of IRS Special Agents. If the value of the property is assessed at $500,000 or less, the IRS Special Agent may publish a binding Notice of Sale of Seized Property. All this and much more is waged as a war against “U.S. citizens” every single day, despite the fact, as you will discover in the next chapters, that the IRS has no authority whatsoever to operate in the sovereign states of the constitutional Republic.”

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires U.S. financial institutions to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering activities overseas. Specifically, the Act requires financial institutions to keep records of cash purchases of negotiable instruments, file reports of cash transactions exceeding $3,000 (daily aggregate amount), and report suspicious activity that might signify money laundering, tax evasion or any other criminal activity. It was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1970. The BSA is sometimes referred to as the “anti-money laundering” law.

Several “anti-money laundering” laws”, including provisions in Title III of the USA Patriot Act, were enacted to amend the BSA. (See 31 USC 5311-5330 and 31 CFR Chapter X [formerly 31 CFR Part 103]).

“The Depositor takes the risk in revealing his
affairs to another, that the information
will be given to the government.”
~ Justice Lewis Powell

The Treasury Enforcement Communications Systems (TECS) was a computer-based information system designed to identify individuals and businesses suspected of involvement in violations of federal law. It was transferred to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). A terminal is in place at virtually every port of entry to the United States to screen suspected tax evaders, criminals or those suspected of removing excessive cash from the country.

The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 authorized the U.S. Treasury to monitor any movement of “U.S. citizens”, including reading license plate numbers. You have probably seen these cameras mounted on freeways, bridges and other intersections around the country to issue citations and track your movements. To protect yourself from this invasion of privacy, you may purchase a can of special spray paint from a spy store for your license plates so video cameras mounted on freeway poles cannot read your license plate number.

USA Passports may be withheld from someone who has failed to file tax returns or who has not paid their “required” income tax. Disputes with the IRS may result in the loss of travel privileges outside the “United States” until the dispute is resolved through the Tax Court.

All this legislation has led us toward a global system of financial tracking, surveillance and control, quite possibly one day administered by the United Nations (UN).

FinCEN Follows the Money

The Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) established a crime center in Arlington, VA, whereby via mega computers the government has combined hundreds of databases of bank records, criminal suspects, driving records, census data and myriads of business and financial activities of millions of honest, law-abiding “U.S. citizens”.

FinCEN is a federal intelligence gathering network operating under the auspices of the U.S. Department of the Treasury. The goal of FinCEN is to collate, analyze and disseminate information on financial crimes, especially drug money laundering. FinCEN is an extensive spy network armed with sophisticated computer resources.

FinCEN has linked 13 intelligence organizations and 14 federal law enforcement agencies such as the NSA, CIA, FBI, BATF, DEA, SS, as well as the IRS, Interpol, and participating financial institutions. Every law enforcement group from the smallest local police department to the National Security Agency (NSA), can access FinCEN in their attempts to identify, track and prosecute criminals, or locate and neutralize those who may be a threat to the State.

“The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is a bureau of the U.S. Treasury Department that collects and analyzes information about financial transactions in order to combat money laundering, terrorist financiers, and other financial crimes. FinCEN was established by order of the Secretary of the Treasury in 1990. In May 1994, its mission was broadened to include regulatory responsibilities. In addition, the Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Enforcement (OFE) was merged with FinCEN in October 1994.”

“On September 26, 2002, the USA PATRIOT Act made FinCEN an official bureau in the Department of the Treasury. Under Section 314 of the USA PATRIOT Act, the Treasury Secretary is required to create a secure network for the transmission of information to enforce the relevant regulations.”

“FinCEN’s regulations under Section 314 of the Act enable federal law enforcement agencies, through FinCEN, to reach out to more than 45,000 points of contact at more than 27,000 financial institutions to locate accounts and transactions of persons that may be involved in terrorist financing and/or money laundering. This cooperative partnership between the financial community and law enforcement allows disparate bits of information to be identified, centralized, and rapidly evaluated.”

Fingerprints, Not Liberty for All

Fingerprinting was designed to help track convicted criminals. Now, along with retina scanning, it is being used to track non-customers who do not have a checking account and want to cash a check drawn on a U.S. bank. If you do not have an account the bank may require you give a fingerprint before cashing the check.

Bankers associations in 16 states are encouraging financial institutions to put non-customers thumb prints on the backs of all checks, in case the individual turns out to be a crook.

Statistics on check fraud provide government planners with evidence to support the position that fingerprinting is the only possible solution to the problem. In Oregon, about a third of all financial institutions are currently using thumb prints for non-customers.“Virtually every financial institution either has or will implement the program,” said Diane Ness, chairwoman of Oregon’s Financial Institution Security Task Force.

There is some forward progress in 2010 on the fingerprinting mandate as some banks (e.g., Bank of America) have voluntarily withdrawn the requirement due to customer complaints or state legislation.

By their rationale, some bank customers may commit fraud, thus it is only a matter of time before all bank customers are fingerprinted as well. Whenever the threshold is pushed and accepted, eventually it will be pushed further still. So what is next? An implanted computer biochip in the human body required for all banking transactions? The global elite have plans for that too. At what point will “U.S. citizens” draw the line and just say, “No”?

There are other solutions to the problem of check fraud which do not violate the basic rights and liberties of “U.S. citizens”, but this fingerprinting and retinal scanning solution imposes the monitoring and regulating of people not accused of a crime.

Have you noticed how more and more problems are solved in this manner, such as –increased restrictions for law-abiding gun owners, curfews for certain age groups, SSNs used as centralized identification, unconstitutional searches and body screening simply for traveling interstate on an airplane – the list of government intrusions goes on and on, and is growing rapidly.

Like cattle ignorantly led to slaughter, far too many “U.S. citizens” are facilitating our gradual enslavement via ignorance, apathy and indifference. Those advocating total control put forth the argument that if an individual is not doing anything illegal, why worry about being monitored?

This is serious and worthy of consideration, because what is “legal or illegal” are determined solely by those in power, and that changes daily on a whim of the legislature and law enforcement communities. Who holds the power over increasingly centralized tracking systems? We the People? No, certainly not anymore.

This extensive government monitoring of innocent people minding their own business is not consistent with the constitutional framework established by the Founders. Centralized tracking systems are evidence of a people being governed from the top-down in a “Democracy”, not a people governing themselves from the bottom-up in a “Republic”.

Mexican Bailout Never Reached the People

The $25 billion that the federal U.S. government appropriated for Mexico during the 1994 economic crisis in Mexico never left New York, but went directly into Goldman-Sachs bank account. Guess who the U.S. President appointed to the position of U.S. Secretary of the Treasury after Lloyd Bentsen?

None other than Robert Rubin, the CEO of Goldman-Sach’s bank account. This is the same man who set up the loan guarantees to the sovereign Republic of Mexico. This is a great example of the revolving door between government and private corporations.

Luis Malgoza, the official spokesman for Mexican Exiles for Democracy (MEFD) said, “There are 16,800,000 Mexicans (or less) forced to be guests of the united states of America because of the economic and political policies of Mexico. The government today in Mexico is one of the most corrupt in the world. The government has taken almost all of the natural resources, almost all of the human resources, almost all of the property and the money.”

“The world powers have tried to Balkanize the European continent while attempting to form one large imperial power in North America, very much like the plans that Hitler had for Europe. They want one central power: the international financial community, which through the International Monetary Fund controls the interests and lives of a billion people on the North American continent.” ~ Luis Malgoza

References:

Wikipedia | The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (computer files of would be assassins and one million people owing the government money)
Quote from Anonymous IRS Agent.
Wikipedia | The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (act required people claiming children as dependents on their tax returns to obtain and list a Social Security number for every claimed child, to verify the child’s existence)(requires children to have SSN at birth through enumeration-at-birth programs).
Wikipedia | Bureau of Engraving and Printing creating a counterfeit proof currency.
Anti-hoarding laws have recently been passed making it illegal to stockpile more than 3 months of food or basic supplies.
New forfeitures laws for expanding IRS powers, Perceptions Magazine (May/June 1995 p.81).
Wikipedia | The Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act of 1970 (aka Bank Secrecy Act).
Quote from Justice Lewis Powell.
Wikipedia | Treasury Enforcement Communications System.
Wikipedia | Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN): www.fincen.gov; Wikipedia | Suspicious Activity Report; Upright Ostrich by Don McAlvany, McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, August 1991 (largest government run, artificial intelligence database ever established with the police powers to investigate so called financial crimes against the New World Order); McAlvany Intelligence Advisor www.mcalvanyintelligenceadvisor.com
Media Bypass Magazine (April 1996).
iewed by Shay McNamara; Bank of America to halt fingerprinting of non-customer check-cashers by Kevin Landrigan, The Telegraph (1/15/10).
Wikipedia | Mexican Peso Crisis; North American News Service, Spring’96, p.24-25.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.259 – 264

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

04. United States Power Structure | Global Power Structure | Sovereign’s Handbook

January 6, 2022January 19, 2025 / Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

The United States Power structure is visible through an alphabet soup conglomerate of a private joint-stock trust – the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB); a territorial collection agency – the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS); a global network of intelligence agencies coordinating media propaganda and regime change – the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA); three branches of de facto federal U.S. government (Executive, Legislative and Judicial), plus numerous U.S. government agencies, private transnational corporations and non-profit organizations.

Short Chart of United States Power Structure

Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS)
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Office of Naval Intelligence and Office of Strategic Services
National Security Agency (NSA)
National Security Council (NSC)
Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA)
U.S. President Executive Branch
U.S. President as Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Military and U.S. Defense Department
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA)
Multi-Jurisdictional Task Force (MJTF)
U.S. State Department
U.S. Department of the Treasury (DOT)
General Accounting Office (GAO)
U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Wall Street Law Firms and Attorneys
U.S. Federal Executive Departments (27)
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA)
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF)
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)
U.S. Congress Legislative Branch
U.S. House of Representatives (435)
Congressional Research Service
U.S. Senate (100)
U.S. Supreme Court Judicial Branch
U.S. Appeals Courts
U.S. Federal District Courts
U.S. State Governors (50)
U.S. Attorney General
National Guard
State Attorney Generals (50)
Attorneys-At-Law and State Bar Associations
Certified Public Accountants (CPAs)
State, County and municipal governments.
State, County and Municipal courts
State, County and municipal police forces, multi-jurisdictional task forces (MJTF)
State and County prison systems

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”
~ Dwight D. Eisenhower

Military Industrial Complex

The defense industry is an extremely lucrative sector that is thriving as countries ramp up their military spending amid the changing geopolitical scenarios. The United States tops the list of the world’s biggest military spenders with an annual military budget of $782 billion in 2022. China, India and Russia are some of the other notable countries that spend a fortune on defense.

Major countries hire defense contractors for military equipment, services and maintenance of their defense systems. The U.S. Department of Defense has contracts worth billions of dollars with organizations from around the world. The top prime contractors of the U.S. Department of Defense are Lockhead Martin (LMT), Raytheon (RTX), Boeing (BA), and Northrop Grumman (NOC).

The military-industrial complex so prevalent during the Cold War and Vietnam years has since transformed into a “military-industrial-medical-police-attorney-prison” complex re-sharpening its focus from the Cold War into an assault against the civil liberties of U.S. citizens, or sovereign “state” Citizens, and an imminent “hot” World War III against Russia, China and Iran.

MILITARY • INDUSTRIAL • POLICE • ATTORNEY • PRISON

The Pentagon is involved in 5G Electromagnetic (EMF) warfare development and mind control experiments on civilian populations. Nanotechnological biochip implants are already bedbug used in human subjects with the capability of tracking through either the satellite-based Global Positioning System (GPS) and/or 5G and 6G wireless networks. The introduction of mRNA vaccines is also playing into this sinister scheme to track and control all of humanity.

The Law Enforcement Satellite System (LESS) has been developed to cut the communications costs incurred by law enforcement agencies which currently maintain separate systems. An entirely new unified police communications infrastructure directly links all government agencies and their enforcement units to the National Crime Information Center which combines all law enforcement data from various agencies.

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent
revolution inevitable.” ~ Robert F. Kennedy (U.S. Senator, 1967)

The so-called “war against terror” supports government at all levels by expanding its military and police capacity. If “domestic terrorism” escalates in spite of tougher laws, then government power mushrooms even more. Today anyone can be labeled a “domestic terrorist” if they hold political views contrary to those in power. And, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will come after them.

“Please let it be known that all of the contents of this book are solely the opinion of the author. Under anti-terrorist legislation now in effect this book could be construed as a veiled threat, anti-government sentiment, even domestic terrorism. Anyone can be blacklisted as a terrorist organization, and have its office raided and property seized without a warrant. You could be arrested, taken from family and friends without due process, a formal accusation or a trial by jury and sent to prison indefinitely.”

You might say, “This could not happen in the united states of America.” Dearest friends, look at the writing on the wall. Criticizing the government used to be an American pastime, to organize rallies in opposition to government policies or corruption, and to lobby against draconian, dystopian laws. Today, such activism is a dangerous proposition regardless of which side of the political spectrum you may stand.

The U.S. Congressional Select Committee investigating the January 6th “insurrection”, and the “inquisition” that followed, is a perfect example of how far those in power will go to protect their turf and retain their power.

“Instead of Viewing…their enemy as external, operating from Moscow, Hanoi or Beijing,..millions of Americans…are awakening…to the fact that America’s primary enemy is internal, operating from New York and Washington D.C.”

“Communism is not [and never was] a creation of the masses to overthrow the Banking establishment, but rather a creation of the Banking establishment to overthrow and enslave the people.”
~ Anthony J. Hilder

References:

Wikipedia | Federal Reserve Bank www.federalreserve.gov
Wikipedia | Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) www.fdic.gov
Wikipedia | Internal Re-Venue Service www.irs.gov
Wikipedia | Central Intelligence Agency www.cia.gov
Wikipedia | National Security Agency www.nsa.gov
Wikipedia | National Security Council www.whitehouse.gov/nsc
Wikipedia | Defense Intelligence Agency/ www.dia.mil
Wikipedia | Executive Branch of the U.S. President: www.whitehouse.gov/our-government/executive-branch; White House Administration: www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop
Wikipedia | U.S. Federal Executive Departments.
Wikipedia | U.S. Congress www.congress.gov
Wikipedia | U.S. Supreme Court www.supremecourt.gov
Wikipedia | 50 U.S. State Governors.
Wikipedia | U.S. Attorney General www.justice.gov
Wikipedia | 50 U.S. State Attorney Generals.
Wikipedia | Quote by Dwight D. Eisenhower.
Yahoo Finance | Top U.S. and Global Defense Contractors.
National Crime Information Center www.ojp.gov
Wikipedia | Quote by Robert F. Kennedy.
Note: Warning written by the author about publishing this controversial book.
Quote by Anthony J. Hilder.