UN

06. Parental Rights Endangered | New World Order / Deep State | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

UN Interference in Child Rearing

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child signed by the United States on February 6, 1995 transferred parental authority to raise one’s children to unelected global policymakers. This treaty fomented the intrusion by the UN into the private affairs of families. To begin, it “mandates” registration of all children of birth, dictates rules about religious training, grants privacy rights to underaged children regarding sex and the related topics of contraceptives, abortion, pornography and transgenderism.

Parents are not allowed to forbid their children to join gangs or cults. If the parents break any of the UN rules they must appear for an inquisition before a tribunal of experts who decide their guilt, innocence and punishment. Concerned Women for America have been fighting to keep this treaty from coming to a vote before the U.S. Senate, but UN officials are now pushing for its ratification, meanwhile implementing these policies anyway.

References:

  1. Wikipedia | UN Convention on the Rights of Child.
  2. Perceptions Magazine (May/June 1996); Reviewed by Estar Holmes, North American News Service, Summer ‘96, p.22.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.251 – 252

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

06. Expanded Police Powers and Foreign Military Forces | New World Order / Deep State | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

End of National Sovereignty of the United States

Former U.S. Senator Prescott Bush, father to the Bush Dynasty of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, helped pass a law in 1961, signed by U.S. President John F. Kennedy, to eliminate the U.S. military and to use foreign troops to police the united states of America.

This was the start of a gradual erosion of the national sovereignty of the U.S. government corporation toward that of a New World Order. The destruction of national sovereignty of the united states of America was almost achieved at the turn of the 21st century by relegating the command of our U.S. military to the United Nations (UN). 

Foreign Military and U.S.Police Powers

Supposedly, U.S. President George W. Bush transferred the command of the U.S. military forces to the United Nations (UN) under their direction and control.

The Global Power structure did not hesitate to use the increasing new “police powers” to enforce their plan for a New World Order. For example, in Bosnia, the largest multinational world army since World War II  was assembled with sixty-thousand (60,000) troops.

In 2004, the “United States” has dozens of distinct federal police organizations with over 105,000 troops including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms (BATF) and the U.S. Marshals.

In 2020, there are 697,195 local and state police forces, many of which have been organized “within the United States” under the Multi-Jurisdictional Counter-Drug Task Force (MJCTF) under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. They have long been equipped with military-style weapons, tanks and drones. 

MJCTF was the velvet glove on an iron fist, comprised of not only military and law enforcement personnel, but also of gangsters from the inner city. MJCTF’s avowed purpose was to perform house-to-house search and seizure operations to seize weapons, guns, food reserves and people when ordered. 

The Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) were foreign military and secret police brought into the “United States” for deployment against “U.S. citizens” under the authority of an Executive Order (EO) of the U.S. President, Interpol, and the United Nations (UN). 

United Nations (UN) troops have been trained in old military bases in the United States for future actions against We the People, or elsewhere in the world. Since November 11, 1990, UN troops have performed joint military exercises with U.S. troops on U.S. Forest Service land in Arizona, Idaho and Montana. 

Other United Nations (UN) battle groups are in Ft. Drum, NY, Ft. Dix, NJ, NC next to VA, TX panhandle near OK, south of Los Angeles, CA. There are United Nations Naval forces throughout MI, MT and Sacramento, CA.

Along with the National Guard and the U.S. Military, you would imagine this would be enough firepower to wage a war against a now, mostly compliant, agreeable people. 

Except that the U.S. military may not be reliable enough to enforce tyrannical laws or assaults against their neighbors, friends and families unless the soldiers have swallowed the “blue” pill or completed their “woke” training seminars. 

Any soldiers who understand their “oath of allegiance” to the U.S. constitution might offer some resistance to the New World Order plans. There are patriotic U.S. military forces, including the Officer Corp and the Delta Force, that may resist the takeover of our nation by domestic or foreign adversaries.

But soldiers from other countries under the flag of the United Nations (UN) might not be as compassionate in dealing with “U.S. citizen” resistance. Therefore, foreign soldiers may be more reliable fighting forces against the people of the united states of America. 

With the Biden Administration’s “open-border” policies, thousands of fresh, foreign military recruits may be enlisted in the U.S. military, or forced into service due to their illegal status.

Rumors of black military helicopters seen in various locations within the united states of America, many associated with Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) operations are true. They have also been engaged in the surveillance of civilians. I had seen an unmarked, black helicopter hovering over my home and office several days before the Internal Re-Venue Service (IRS) raids of February 28, 2001. As it turned out, the unmarked helicopter were taking infrared photographs to locate computers and other electronic equipment which was verified in the search warrant. 

According to eye witnesses, Russian military equipment was being unloaded at shipping docks, and imported from foreign countries to points in Mexico. There are 800 concentration camps in the “United States” that were recently refurbished. What are “concentration camps or reeducation camps” doing here in the united states of America? We had better ask the question before it is too late.

Persian Gulf War Forces Exposed to Biological and Chemical Agents  

Joyce Riley, RN was afflicted with the Gulf War Syndrome and survived to lead a campaign to help sick and dying veterans being shunned by the Veterans Administration (VA) and the U.S. Department of Defense. She said, “Only 143 American men and women died in the (first) Gulf War. Now 10,000 to 12,000 are dead.”

One of a few allies, former U.S. Senator Donald W. Riegle Jr., Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking Housing and Urban Affairs, released a report in September 1993 revealing that U.S. troops were exposed to chemical and biological warfare agents during the Iraq war. Concerned for the health of U.S. veterans and their families, who were also getting sick, he held a U.S. Senate hearing on February 9, 1994 which revealed Gulf War troops were indeed subjected to experimental vaccinations, irradiated foods, radioactive munitions and a toxic soup of substances released by the Iraq bombings. This was localized nuclear warfare which was never fully disclosed to the soldiers on the battlefield.

His committee requested records from the U.S. Department of Commerce to show the U.S. government approved the sale of biological materials to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission, the Iraq Ministry of Higher Education, the State Company for Drug Industries and the Ministry of Trade before the war again. These were used as weapons which harmed U.S. troops in the Iraq war.

In 1992, a U.S. Department of Defense report called Conduct of the Persian Gulf War said: “(Iraq’s) advanced and aggressive biological warfare program was the most advanced in the Arab world…(The) program…concentrated on the development of two agents, botulinum toxin and anthrax bacteria… Delivery means for biological agents ranged from simple aerial bombs and artillery rockets to surface-to-surface missiles.”

Riley showed twenty (20) different biological weapons loaded into the warheads along with cyanide which was used to make the gas mask filters ineffective. “When the U.S. patriot missiles knocked Short-Range Ballistic Missiles, or SCUDS out at 200 feet over the heads of the American troops, they were rained on with biologicals.”

The following biological materials, all of which have potential weapons applications, were sold to the Iraqis by American companies — Bacillus Anthracis, Clostridium Botulinu, Histoplasma Capsalatum, Bruccella Melitensis, and Clostridium Perfringens.

Orders for E. Coli, genetic materials and human bacterial DNA were shipped directly to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission. The U.S. military was an accomplice in these 10,000 – 12,000 deaths by approving the sale of materials which violated the Geneva Convention. The U.S. military may be doing exactly the same in Ukraine during the Russia-Ukraine police action.

Ms. Riley also said, “The US government and Iraq violated the Geneva Convention of 1972. There are tremendous criminal and political implications in this.”

The symptoms suffered by Persian Gulf War veterans spread to family members and pets, and an inordinate number of the Veteran’s children are born dead or deformed. Ms. Riley revealed that U.S. troops returning from other wars and engagements are exhibited similar symptoms. “Men returning from Somalia were sick, people returning from Bosnia had rashes and a strange viral illness, and troops on a three-month rotation in Kuwait came back sick with a rash.” 

U.S. Companies Profited from Biological Warfare Ingredients in the Persian Gulf War

Despite U.S. Senate hearings and evidence to the contrary, the U.S. Department of Defense and the Veterans Administration (VA) continued to issue reports concluding that they could find no single cause of the health problems of Persian Gulf War veterans. They were of course, lying as usual.

Peter Kawaja, a security specialist who provided security to Product Ingredient Technology (PIT) in Florida and Ishan Barbouf International (IBI), said germ warfare was indeed used in the Persian Gulf War and that the United States sent soldiers into the war knowing biologicals would likely be used. In addition, the hydrogen cyanide used to render gas mask filters ineffective was tested at Product Ingredient Technology (PIT) for over a year prior to the war.

In 1989, Kawaja was asked to install a hydrogen cyanide detection system for the company. He became suspicious of the company’s motives and reported their activities to the CIA, FBI and U.S. Customs.
The U.S. government told him Ishan Barbouf International (IBI) were “international terrorists” and that the government was going to prosecute them. That never happened. 

In 1990, he sent a secret message to the National Security Agency (NSA) warning that Iraqi intelligence was operating in the US close to a classified military facility. He had obtained audio and video recordings, fax transmissions and paper documentation of federal agents, politicians and the “terrorists” regarding connections to Commodity Credit Corporation-Banca Nazionale del Lavorro (CCC-BNL).
To cover up his discoveries, eight federal agents subsequently burst into his office at the International Security Group (ISG) and confiscated videos and other documentation without presenting a search warrant. This evidence was subsequently sealed for “national security” purposes. Four years later, Mr. Kawaja had it unsealed. 

The documents proved that U.S. government agents knew that Barbouti, who had previously built the Pharma-150 Chemical/Biological Complex at Rabta, Libya, had established a chemical warfare production facility at the PIT plant in Florida. The documents showed that the government was familiar with Barbouti’s ownership of CROSS LINK in Belgium which is connected to CCC-BNL.

 Brent Sowcroft of the National Security Council, was a consultant to BNL. Attorney General Janet Reno appointed John Hogan II to investigate BNL, an attorney from Miami, FL who represented Ishan Barouf International. The only major portion of his BNL Task Force Report that was blacked out is on Ishan Barbouti. 

Apparently, U.S. President George Bush, James Baker III, and John Deutch all had financial interests in some of the corporations that developed, sold and transferred the biological and chemical weapons to Iraq before the war, according to Peter Kawaja and doctors, Garth and Nancy Nicholson.

Electromagnetic Warfare by U.S. Military

Potential uses for the Electromagnetic (EMF) spectrum in warfare was described in an Air Force Document called, Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology in 1986. In the forward, Newt Gingrich touted the United State’s ability to successfully cope with low-intensity threats, intimating that electronic weapons are the ideal tools to accomplish that goal. They have been used overtly and subtly.

The Pentagon’s energy weapons development program includes high power lasers that disorient the enemy, strobe lights that nauseate uncooperative crowds, and high-powered microwaves that disable electronic components. The U.S. Air Force already deploys flying transmitters that intercept radio transmissions and replace the content to the controller’s liking.

Operation Sleeping Beauty during the Reagan Administration explored ways to disrupt the human nervous system through electro-magnetics. The program sought to manipulate the reason, emotions and physical sensations of subjects and to “unhinge a human’s mind”. 

Theoretically, practical uses for such electro-magnetic capabilities included the quieting of mobs by triggering mass vomiting, electronically disorienting hostage-takers minds, and the disabling of terrorists holed up in compounds with explosives. In 1990, the U.S. Department of Defense said the Soviets had the ability to produce radio frequency weapons that could disorient people at a distance of a half mile. Apparently, the Soviet’s capacities at mind control were much more sophisticated than those of the United States.

According to Newsweek, Moscow conferred with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) during the Waco siege about their technique of beaming inaudible transmissions into a subjects brain. This method would have caused the Branch Davidian’s leader David Koresh to think he was hearing the voice of God in his head. During Waco, the U.S. Air Force offered the FBI one of its top-secret non-lethal weapons which “would have given [the FBI] the ability to make a surprise attack with a large number of agents.”  After Waco, Former U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno asked the Pentagon and the CIA to join her in further exploration of the use of these “non-lethal technologies” for both U.S. military and civilian law enforcement purposes.

Even though these weapons were billed as “non-lethal”, an article written as early as 1980 in Military Review, said, “…There are weapons systems that operate on the power of mind whose lethal capacity has already been demonstrated.”

In 1994, a U.S. Air Force publication, Defense News projected that it was possible to locate anyone on the planet (through their cell phones) and then target them for disruption through thought implantation techniques delivered by future 5G wireless networks. Similar technologies have been developed to pump millions of watts of electricity deep into the Earth and far into the upper atmosphere such as HAARP.

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) 

The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is a geophysical weapon so powerful, it is still considered today by many to be a weapon of mass destruction.

The U.S. Air Force site near Gakona, AK is home to HAARP, which is only one among many similar installations across the globe’s “superDARN Highway”, an array of High Frequency (HF) radar now covering most of the northern and southern hemispheres.

Drone Warfare

An unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), also known as a combat drone is an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) that is used for intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance. It carries aircraft weapons such as missiles and/or bombs in hard points for drone strikes. 

These drones are usually under real-time human control, with varying levels of autonomy.Unlike unmanned surveillance and reconnaissance aerial vehicles, UCAVs are used for both drone strikes and battlefield intelligence.

References:

  1. Cato Institute: www.cato.org; Cato Report on Paramilitary Raid.
  2. Liberty International and YouTube | JFK To 911: Everything is a Rich Man’s Trick (film) by Francis Conolly reveals U.S. Senator Prescott Bush’s involvement in the assassination of JFK; Crossing the Rubicon – The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil by Michael Ruppert: Amazon
  3. Public Law 87-297 (1961), Vol #9, USC, p.554 and State Department Paper 7277 (eliminate American armed forces, total disarmament and UN troops would police USA); EO#12148 by President Jimmy Carter (FEMA would command all military forces as deputy U.S. Marshals);  U.S. Marshals have sworn an oath to uphold the United Nations and President George Bush transferred command of the American military forces on September, 11, 2001 (confirmed in Pandora’s Box, p.489.) including the FBI, ATF and U.S. Marshals;  Can the President as Commander in Chief of the United States Military Delegate Power over to the U.N. Secretary General?, The Higher Truth (Vol 1, Issue 1, p.17).
  4. Wikipedia | Federal Police Organization and Troops number 105,000 (2004); Statista | 697,195 local and state police forces; Wikipedia | Multi-Jurisdictional Counterdrug Task Force (MJCTF).
  5. Perceptions Magazine, May/June 1995, p.84; Seeks to create a “rapid strike force” of 2,500 federal law enforcement officers; Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars by Hardford Van Dyke; Amazon; Top secret document that is proof positive of a secret declaration of war against the American people; Sourced from Government’s Liberty…Brings Death To Freedom, p.114; William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse; The World Economy for the Year 2000, Scientific American, Sep. 1980; U.N. troops are in the U.S. to enforce FEMA and confiscate firearms and support the MJTF search and seizure operations confirmed in Alexander Christopher, Pandora’s Box, p.483; Preposterous legislation has passed the U.S. Congress giving police the authority to behead people; Public Law 102-14; Railroad cars have been spotted in the U.S. with shackles built into the sides, handcuffs and guillotines; Towards The New World Order:  America’s Secret Police Force, Nexus (Feb/March 1994, p.11); Insiders view of FEMA, MJTF and FinCEN.
  6. Wikipedia | Amended Posse Comitatus Act of 1981; Mark Koernke, Former CIA Intelligence Analyst and reputed founder of the Michigan Militia; Alexander Christopher, Pandora’s Box, pp.489-506; There have been many independent sightings of U.N. equipment and soldiers training on American soil;  What are they doing here and why are we not permitted to ask?
  7. Combat Arms Survey which was administered to United States Marines at the Twenty-nine Palms, California, Marin base on May 10, 1994 under the guise of a research project. It asks soldiers if they would obey U.N. officers, and if they would confiscate firearms from American citizens and shoot those who resist; The Higher Truth  (Vol. 1, Issue 1, p.18) and supplied by a young Marine who had answered the survey.
  8. Exotic Research Reports: The Patriot News; Liberty International Archives. 
  9. Exotic Research Reports (Winter 1996); Reviewed by Estar Holmes, North American News Service, Summer ‘96, p.26; Liberty International Archives. 
  10. Exotic Research Reports; Newsweek, (Feb. 7, 1994); Reviewed by Estar Holmes, North American News Service, Summer ‘96, p.38; Liberty International Archives. 
  11. Wikipedia | HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program); Geoengineering Watch | What is HAARP?
  12. Wikipedia | Unmanned combat aerial vehicle.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.229 – 234

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

04. State of New Columbia | Global Power Structure | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

In the last century since the American Civil War, the United States and European Power structures have achieved almost total consolidation of power in the federal U.S. government corporation. 

This shift of power from the sovereign states and their respective “state” Citizens has created a central government located geo-politically in the District of Columbia (D.C.). 

To add insult to injury, and to further shift power into the international and global arenas, the District of Columbia (D.C.) reorganized as the “State of New Columbia” – a superstate.

Historically, the political relationship between the District of Columbia (D.C.) and the states of the Union has been a great mystery to many people. The District of Columbia (D.C.) was originally donated by the states of Maryland and Virginia, and has been a federal territory since the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1791. 

New Flag Flying Over the Capitol

Today, there is another flag flying over the District of Columbia (D.C.), but it is not the old red, white and blue American flag.  

In 1982, the District of Columbia (D.C.) established itself as the “State of New Columbia”, complete with a brand-new constitution that bears no resemblance to the Constitution for the united States of America. Furthermore, the State of New Columbia is not the same legal or political entity as the incorporated City of Washington D.C. 

The Bilderberg Group wants the State of New Columbia represented in the United Nations as an independent nation and does not care for U.S. citizens living in Washington D.C. The Bilderberg Group, a bastion of the global elite, is behind a move to take the issue of representation for the District of Columbia (D.C.) to the United Nations. If the Bilderberg Group is behind anything, caveat emptor, or buyer beware. 

The District of Columbia (D.C.) became a trust territory of the United Nations (UN), and the independent State of New Columbia in 1982 by a majority vote of the“electors” of the District of Columbia, not by U.S. citizens living in Washington D.C.   

The State of New Columbia is the seat of power for another super-state of the emerging Global Power structure which is separate and distinct from the federal U.S. government and the U.S. Congress. New Columbia, London and the Vatican are three of the superstates plus Basil, Switzerland, and the Bank of International Settlements. 

NEW COLUMBIA • LONDON • VATICAN

Washington insiders are well aware that the name of the District of Columbia (D.C.) was changed to the “State of New Columbia”when its new constitution was passed by a 61,405 to 54,964 vote ratified by 116,000 “electors” in Washington D.C. on November 2, 1982. There are two constitutions, one “for” and the other b the State of New Columbia.

The “State of New Columbia” is a self-governing, municipal body politic which is not a signatory to the U.S. Constitution, nor is it bound to its terms. New Columbia operates subject to no law except its own, the Municipal law of District of Columbia (D.C.)  

The U.S. Congress gave itself a blank-check delegation of powers, authority and conscience to act as the sovereign for New Columbia.  Lawmakers have given themselves a mandate for providing benefits to whomever they please in whatever way they deem best, according to statutory law alone. 

In New Columbia, similar to the United Nations Charter of Rights, you can forget about the Common law concepts of sovereignty or unalienable rights under the U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights.

Trust Territory of the United Nations

To further expand your mind, the District of Columbia (D.C.), not being a state of the Union, is now  defined as a “trust territory”.  A trust territory is now defined in the sixth edition of Black’s Law Dictionary as “a territory or colony placed underadministration of a country by the United Nations.”

In essence, the District of Columbia (D.C.), has been reconstituted as the “State of New Columbia” and placed under the administration of a country, for example,  the United States, Inc. by the United Nations (UN).

The “State of New Columbia” is not only a superstate, but a field of commerce, governed by merchants and driven by consumers, using increasingly electronic ways of doing business. 

The rules on this new playing field are the “Municipal laws” of the District of Columbia (D.C.) and the “State of New Columbia”. The “State of New Columbia” has authority over legal “persons” who have agreed to be incorporated by the U.S. Congress within its exclusive, legislative jurisdiction. 

In other words, legal “persons” such as “U.S. citizens”, corporations and commercial enterprises that enter various commercial contracts with the “State of New Columbia”. 

Thus, to remain free of the jurisdiction of this new superstate, you must reclaim your American National or “state” Citizenship in a sovereign state, and/or declare a contractual status known as sui juris. “In his or her own right, possessing rights to which freeman or freewoman is entitled, to not being under the power of another as in the case of a slave, minor, or the like.”

References:

  1. Thanks to Attorney Jeffrey Thayer and Melanie Miller for their commitment to the sovereignty movement in America. Jeffrey Thayer was the first attorney in America to give up his bar license and become a people’s lawyer and researcher in sovereignty issues. Recently, he brought the “State of New Columbia” to our attention.
  2. State of New Columbia | Constitution “of” and “for” the State of New Columbia. New Columbia Admissions (H.R. 265); Act not ratified by U.S. Congress.
  3. Blacks Law definition of “trust territory”.
  4. Chapter sourced from an article by Jeffrey Thayer, Perceptions Magazine; Walker News Desk | Three “Super” States – The City of London, The State of New Columbia and The Vatican; Wikipedia | State of Columbia Statehood Movement

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.144 – 146

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

04. United Nations | Global Power Structure | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

Founding of the United Nations

The United Nations (UN) was founded on October 24, 1945 in the aftermath of World War II. The UN was the substitute for the League of Nations which failed on its first attempt to create one-world government after World War I. Today, there are 193 member states of the United Nations (UN). All participate in the United Nations General Assembly.

There are five permanent member states: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly.

Compare the United Nations “Charter of Rights” with the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” as author and educator G. Edward Griffin did. You will notice a profound difference. Whereas the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” grants human rights “except where prohibited by law”, the “U.S. Constitution with the Bill of Rights” limits and prohibits the federal U.S. government corporation from infringing upon the inherent sovereign “unalienable rights” of its sovereign “state” Citizens and U.S. citizens.

This demonstrates the profound distinction between “human rights”, or “civil rights”, and “unalienable rights”. One does not acknowledge individual “sovereignty” and the other does.

If you look back at the Congressional Record, you will discover that “United States” participation in the United Nations (UN) was never lawfully ratified by the U.S. Congress, even though the United Nations (UN) “Charter of Rights” was approved in 1945. All member states of the United Nations (UN) must surrender a portion of their inherent national sovereignty to participate. The UN Security Council coordinates military/peacekeeping operations of its member states along with the Agency for International Development. Given the state of the world, we are not certain how much “peacekeeping” has actually occurred since its inception.

After the COVID-19 “plandemic”, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed to its member states signing on to an international treaty to appoint WHO as the global agency in charge of all future “plandemic” responses worldwide. Considering WHO’s ineptness and dishonesty in dealing with the COVID-19 “plandemic” from 2020 – 2022, not to mention persistently lying to the public to protect China’s interests, this is a ludicrous and dangerous idea.

During his term in office as U.S. President, Donald Trump addressed the United Nations (UN) with his “America First” policy, which is a policy whereby each member state should put their own people and their own “sovereignty” above that of the globalists. 

If every nation was indeed “sovereign”, there would be less problems to deal with globally. But one-world government is not about solving problems or improving the quality of life for the people of the world. One-world government is about power, unelected power, top-down power ruling us all from the very apex of the pyramid.

For the first time in decades, a sitting U.S. President advocated for a strong policy of “national sovereignty” for every nation in the world during his annual speech to the United Nations (UN). He was met with laughter and ridicule by most of the member states. That says it all.

Sovereign Nations Need Not Apply

Sovereign nations such as “Taiwan” will not be admitted to the United Nations (UN) because China, who is a powerful member of the Security Council, is opposed to the idea. China still claims that “Taiwan” is a rogue state and is a “territory” of China. That is despite the fact that “Taiwan” was settled by “freedom fighters” who escaped mainland China during the Red Revolution.

“Taiwan” has not been admitted to the United Nations because China still lays claim to “Taiwan” as it did with Tibet before the Chinese invaded, took over Tibet and booted out the Dalai Lama. China is more eager than ever to reclaim “Taiwan” as part of China, but it will take a messy war to accomplish it.

“Taiwan” is also not bankrupt to the international bankers or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and/or World Bank (WB). As a rule of thumb, only indebted and perpetually bankrupt nations need apply to the United Nations (UN). 

There are a few “gold-backed” exceptions to this rule, such as digital or blockchain currencies in the United States, Arab Emirates (U.A.E.), Indonesia, China and Russia. Russia is debt-free to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and has one of the lowest debt to GDP ratios in the world. 

One principle of “national sovereignty” is that only one sovereign nation state can occupy the same geography at the same time. Thousands of unrecognized indigenous nations exist who are not eligible for United Nations (UN) membership, because they are within the boundaries of other member nations.

Before the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) central banking system in the “United States”, the government created the post office and national banks without interference or intrusion by the international banks. Debt-free nations can create and print their own money internally instead of relying on the Rothschilds/Rockefeller central banking system. Debt-free nations are economically sustainable without any need of foreign borrowing with interest.

United Nations Global Governance Commission

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance called for a World Conference on Global Governance (1998). The purpose of the conference was to adopt treaties and agreements that would pave the way for one-world government before the year 2030.

The official United Nations (UN) motive for global government is the establishment of justice, human rights and economic equity worldwide. Social and economic justice, the theory goes, can only happen when all of humankind is equalized with an idea such as “Universal Basic Income (UBI)”. That sounds like a very socialist/communist idea.

Apparently, Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (WEF) suggested that by 2030 the mass of humanity will “own nothing, but be happy.” This is part of their grandiose notion of a “Great Reset”.The authors of this book politely disagree and do not concur with Schwab’s assessment.

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance assumed that people will be ready by 2030 to accept a new “global ethic”. But they said that “people of the land” may have to overcome the primal instinct of wanting to own either private or community property. Those who buck the United Nation’s plans will be “reeducated”through the use of international law backed with military force.

The United Nations Commission on Global Governance says, “Global taxation is necessary to service the needs of the global neighborhood. The safeguarding of the global commons cannot be achieved with the current drip-feed approach to financing.”

A United Nations Global Transaction Tax, among other world tax schemes, was proposed to fund an expansion of the United Nations. Many other funding proposals have been made. During COVID-19, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed a 10% of GDP global tax from every member state to fight the “plandemic”. Most of these proposals have failed to pass as all have been challenged on the basis of “national sovereignty”. 

The Global Commission to Fund the United Nations revealed that today’s present financial constraints on United Nations (UN) activities require a change in financing methods for the world body. They assert it’s now time to “shift the burden of financing the UN from national to global sources by introducing charges for the use of the global commons, for example, the Internet, or levies on international activities such as foreign currency transactions.”  

United Nations Flow Chart and Treaties

  • United Nations Charter (UN)
  • UN Budget (2021)
  • UN Security Council
  • UN Treaties
  • UN Arms Treaty
  • UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
  • UNEP (United Nations Environment Program)
  • World Health Organization 
  • UNICEF
  • Agency for International Development
  • World Bank (WB)

United States Support for United Nations

The Clinton Administration supported the United Nation’s (UN) program enthusiastically. For instance, Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, wrote an article for Time magazine called The Birth of the Global Nation, and he won the Global Governance Award from the World Federalist Association (1993). 

U.S. President Clinton supported the UN’s agenda with his Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25), a declassified document. A summary revealed the “Creation by the UN of a Plans Division, an Information and Research Division, an Operations Division, a Logistical Division, A Public Affairs Cell, a Civil Police Cell and a Professional Peace Operations Training Program.”

The United Nations (UN) needed and needs to maintain a rapidly deployable headquarters team and modest airlift capabilities. The Clinton administration claimed that Presidential Decision Directive (PDD25) gives the U.S. President authority to assign U.S. military personnel to the United Nations for “peacekeeping” missions in Somalia and other places. 

The George W. Bush Administration did not support the United Nations (UN) as enthusiastically as did Clinton. He took a radical departure toward unilateral action by the “United States” with no regard to the international community. “The audacity of Bush’s Iraq war maneuvers and his crude bullying threatens not only the United Nations, but the dream of world governance and world peace…Bush returned international relations to the raw power politics of the nineteenth century and abandons international law for the law of the jungle.”

The Obama Administration did much the same as Bush and Clinton. Since the United Nations (UN) is based in New York City, on land donated by the Rockefellers. The primary funder of the United Nations (UN) is the “United States”. Due in part to the UN’s ineptness, the Trump Administration cut funding for the United Nations (UN) suggesting that other member states make larger contributions.

References:

  1. United Nations Security Council | Five permanent members and ten elected every two years.
  2. Wikipedia | Freedom Force International | G. Edward Griffin compares the United Nations Charter with the U.S. Constitution | Cato Institute | Comparing EU Constitution with U.S. Constitution.
  3. White House Archives | Donald Trump addressing the United Nations (UN) on his “America First” policy.
  4. Wikipedia | Taiwan is still on the gold-standard.
  5. Citation Needed | Six countries not part of the World Bank Group are as follows: Cuba, North Korea, Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco and Nauru. Taiwan has the largest economy outside the World Bank. The two observer states, Vatican City as well as the State of Palestine, are also non-members.
  6. SCMP | China’s local government debt a concern?; Wikipedia | List of nations with external debt; As an interesting footnote China’s National Audit Office said that local government obligations hit 45 trillion yuan ($7 trillion USD) by the end of 2020 — a dramatic increase from the 10.7 trillion yuan figure reported in 2010; In fact China’s listed debt is internal, not external.
  7. Wikipedia | List of Countries by External Debt.
  8. Stanford Basic Income Lab | Universal Basic Income.
  9. World Economic Forum | Great Reset.
  10. Wikipedia | Proposed world tax schemes.
  11. Wikipedia | UN Charter.
  12. UN News | UN Budget 2021; The annual UN budget is slightly more than $3 billion USD.
  13. Wikipedia | UN Security Council www.un.org/en/sc/
  14. Wikipedia | UN Treaties (and all other treaties with the U.S.).
  15. Wikipedia | UNESCO www.unesco.org/new/en.
  16. Wikipedia | UNEP www.unep.org
  17. Wikipedia | World Health Organization www.who.int/en
  18. Wikipedia | UNICEF www.unicef.org
  19. Wikipedia | US Agency for International Development www.usaid.gov
  20. Wikipedia | World Bank www.worldbank.org
  21. Sourced from Multiple Land Use Review, March/April 1996; Citation Needed | Treason in High Places by William Cooper, Behold A Pale Horse, pp.239-249 (comments on the United Nations Treaty, the United Nations Participation Act V. the sovereignty of the United States of America); Amazon | Wikipedia | Presidential Decision Directive (PDD) 25; PDD-25 was intended to prevent the United States from using UN peacekeeping operations as the centerpiece of its foreign policy. 
  22. Progressive Magazine | Bush Trashes the UN.
  23. Independent | Donald Trump to sign executive order to dramatically reduce funding of UN.

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.137 – 141

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK

03. Native Sovereignty & Doctrine of Discovery | Indigenous Sovereignty | Sovereign’s Handbook

/ Chief Visionary Officer & Founder / Leave a comment

By Johnny Liberty

Self-determination is the deciding by a people of a nation what form of government they shall have without reference to the wishes of any other nation….the people have a range of choices from total assimilation within another nation, territory status, autonomy, statehood, free association, commonwealth to total independence and sovereignty.” ~ Francis Anthony Boyle, Attorney

The right of a people to self-determination is a cardinal principle in modern international law commonly regarded as a jus cogens rule. All people, based on respect for the principle of equal rights and fair equality of opportunity, have the right to freely choose their sovereignty and international political status with no interference.

Indigenous “Native sovereignty” is a necessary precursor to continue our exploration of “sovereignty” as it relates to the united states of America. Prior to our discussion in the last chapter, many people had only learned about “sovereignty” in the context of indigenous First People’s struggles to reclaim their inherent rights to self-determination, their right to just and fairly administered treaties and the recognition of First People’s culture, language and nations under international law. 

Manifest Destiny & Spiritual Debt

The Power structures of both Western and Eastern nations cannot continue to desecrate or ignore indigenous people’s rights to “Native sovereignty”, to allow First People’s nations to co-exist amidst our destructive pursuit for land, wealth, gold and resources. What was once considered the “manifest destiny” of colonial “Sovereign Powers structures” are now, and justly so, finished.

Today, there are no more continents or native people left to conquer or vanquish. The last frontiers on this ever shrinking planet are not outside of us, but the pursuit of higher consciousness, as well as achieving economic, social, political and environmental justice for all the people. 

To manifest these last frontiers, we must not only include indigenous nations, but learn how to live sustainably on the earth in our last noble quest for self-determination and “sovereignty for all the people”. 

We the People of the united states of America have a spiritual debt to the indigenous people in this country, and of the earth, that can never be repaid except with humility and gratitude. 

We the People must acknowledge the terrible transgressions and genocides of our forefathers and foremothers for us all to be healed. No sincere happiness can be found in these united states of America or any other European nation until this healing work is done. 

Western civilization and the Roman Catholic Church is riddled with centuries of deeply ingrained guilt and shame for the horrible deeds done in the name of religion and the name of “progress”. This all must be healed to restore “sovereignty for all the people”. 

Perpetual Slavery for Indigenous Native People

Forty years before Christopher Columbus set foot in the Americas on behalf of Spain, Pope Nicholas V gave express permission by issuance of the papal bull Romanus Pontifex (1455) to King Alfonso of Portugal to claim and capture lands in West Africa “to capture, vanquish, and subdue, the Saracens, Pagans, and other enemies of Christ…to take all their possessions and property, and to put them into perpetual slavery.”

With this document, and its predecessor in Roman law, terra nullus, Pope Nicholas V essentially declared war against all non-Christians throughout the world. 

“This Doctrine of Discovery, an ancient doctrine of the Christian world, still serves as the foundation of federal Indian law in the United States.” ~ Steven T. Newcomb

After Pope Alexander VI heard of Columbus’ successful “discovery” to the America’s on behalf of Spain he promptly issued the Inter Cetera papal bull on May 3, 1493 in which he declared that “the Catholic faith and Christian religion be everywhere increased and spread and that barbarous nations be overthrown and brought to the faith itself.”

Pope Alexander VI called on the monarchs of Spain and Portugal to subdue and convert all native lands and possessions. In essence the Pope decreed under papal law that unconverted heathens had no rights whatsoever to self-determination. Even if the indigenous tribal chiefs signed a peace treaty, it was considered non-binding because they were non-entities under the “Canon law”. 

Thus generations of treaties with indigenous people have been routinely dishonored, and native people still suffer great injustice at the hands of their conquerors to this very day. 

The roots of religious persecution and racism go long and deep in the united states of America, and around the world. There can be no religious justification for genocide, or the annihilation of any indigenous culture in the eyes of Source or God. If ones religion does not teach and practice the Golden rule, then religion has nothing to offer us.

No Separation of Church and State

The U.S. government is believed to have conducted its affairs in accordance with separation of Church and State. This is not true, however, with regard to the indigenous people of North America.

The U.S. Supreme Court formally wrote the “Doctrine of Discovery” into the laws of the United States in the case of Johnson v. McIntosh (1823). Chief Justice John Marshall wrote: “Discovery gave title to the government, by whose subject, or by whose authority it was made, against all other European governments.”

This doctrine has been primarily used to support decisions invalidating or ignoring aboriginal possession of land in favor of modern colonial governments such as in the case of Sherrill v. Oneida Nation (2005). 

Furthermore, in the case of County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y. (1985), “Fee title to the lands occupied by Indians when the colonists arrived became vested in the sovereign – first the discovering European nation and later the original States and the United States”.

Today, very few people realize that the legal distinction between Christians and aboriginal people (i.e. indigenous people, Native American, First People, Indians) is still incorporated in the U.S. Constitution as the “law of the land”. 

Based on this ancient “Doctrine of Discovery”, and the federal law based upon it, the United States government continues to deny indigenous people the recognition of their inherent tribal sovereignty and treaty rights in their own ancestral homelands of North America with a singular exception that Indian Territory (i.e., Reservations) is not subject to state or local taxes.

“Indian people are still denied their rights simply because they were not Christians at the time of European arrival.” ~ Steven Newcomb

Natural Law Rights & Inherent Sovereignty Under International Law

Indigenous people still have unalienable, natural law rights to inherent sovereignty as independent nations under international law. This principle has never been refuted in American law, despite numerous treaties being dishonored or ignored.

The indigenous people of North America never lost or surrendered their inherent sovereignty, but were conquered and subdued to the point of annihilation through the horrible genocide of the U.S. military and private mercenaries. Indigenous lands were essentially taken by force and stolen, then sold to private individuals and corporations by the federal U.S. government. 

Many indigenous people, dispirited and dispossessed by the genocidal actions against their families and tribes, were forced to submit to the federal U.S. government under the stewardship of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) of the federal U.S. government. Crazy Horse was one of the last free Indians to ride the plains and preferred death instead of submitting to white rule and forced to live on a reservation.

Indigenous people can still reclaim their native and tribal sovereignty by disengaging from federal U.S. government benefit programs if they can restore economic, legal and political sovereignty over their own affairs as an independent nation such as the Onondaga People of New York.

“The Onondaga people have consistently rejected the notion of changing from our traditional chiefs to become a ‘tribal’ or switch to an elective government. The Onondaga have remained steadfast despite the many efforts by the United States and the Bureau of Indian Affairs to change us.” 

Indian tribes exercising powers of self-government under the jurisdiction of the federal U.S. government are limited by the U.S. constitution. 

Tribal Governments As Sovereign Nations

Whereas tribal governments who choose to function as sovereign nations can still do so, but incorporated tribes must revoke their corporate charters to reclaim their inherent sovereignty or be subject to the municipal law of the District of Columbia (D.C.) like any other U.S. state. 

Tribal members with Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) numbers similar to SSN’s, they must revoke those numbers to reclaim their inherent sovereignty.

Eventually, tribal governments could dissolve their corporation, then break all in voluntary contractual relationships with the state and federal U.S. government except for diplomatic and trade relationships. 

For those tribal members who are also U.S. citizens, perhaps one can restore inherent sovereignty on non-tribal land by updating land patents land and declaring “allodial” titles on those lands.

Vatican Must Rescind Doctrine of Discovery & Provide Reparations with Land

One of many steps to bring this immoral, though legal, system of colonization, exploitation and genocide to its conclusion as a tragic part of human history, is for the “Doctrine of Discovery” to be formally rescinded by papal decree with reparations provided in land. The Pope and the Vatican are the third largest land owner in the world with over 177,000,000 acres.

An Open Letter to the Pope has been written to the Pope many times by many people and religious organizations, although he has so far ignored the request. 

In 2012, the United Nations Economic and Social Council Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues called for a mechanism to investigate historical land claims based on the discovery doctrine.

In 2009, the Episcopal Church repudiated the Doctrine of Discovery as did the Unitarian Universalist Association in 2012. Other religious groups – the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), the World Council of Churches, New York Yearly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends, the United Methodist Church, to name a few – have also repudiated it. 

But the Vatican has refused to publicly address Catholicism’s role in bringing about the Doctrine of Discovery, or revoke the papal bulls that articulated it.

Indigenous Economic Sovereignty

For purposes of economic development and improving conditions on the reservations in Indian Territories, casino gambling as a tourist attraction, and other sustainable industries such as wind and solar power, could be an economic means toward economic sovereignty. Any environmentally destructive industry such as uranium mining should be shut down.

Tribal governments who have already built casinos could continue to operate them for a limited time for the purposes of economic development, then shut them down and convert the facilities to tribal use such as offices, schools or hospitals. Funds generated by these indigenous enterprises could be used to rebuild infrastructure and a balanced relationship with the land.

Any indigenous enterprises that remain could be integrated into a “Sovereign Trust” on behalf of the indigenous nation. This could be a legal instrument for implementing sovereignty in all tribal nations, and having them recognized internationally by establishing self-government under the Law of Nations.

The federal U.S. government recognizes indigenous sovereignty in economically and legally. Consider this excerpt from an affidavit of a former, high-level CIA operative who was responsible for developing a copy of the Inslaw software on the Cabazon reservation.

“The Cabazon Band of Indians are a sovereign nation. The sovereign immunity that is accorded the Cabazons as a consequence of this fact made it feasible to pursue on the reservation the development and/or manufacture of materials whose development or manufacture would be subject to stringent controls off the reservation.” ~ Michael J. Riconsciuto

Indigenous sovereignty movements are afoot in many of the stronger native cultures in Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania such as the Haida people. 

There are over 5,000 distinct indigenous cultures in the world, often nations within nations, that have not been recognized by the 193 member states of the United Nations (UN) as sovereign nations with the unalienable rights of self-determination. The UN estimates the indigenous population at over 370 million people spread out over 20% of the planet. 

May all indigenous people restore their cultural traditions and native languages,  self-reliance and self-sufficiency on the land.

In hindsight may we remember, according to Charles C. Mann, author of 1491, indigenous people were the “persecuted survivors of a recently shattered culture…not a people without history incapable of change.”

References:

  1. Wikipedia | Dr. Francis Anthony Boyle; Infoplease | Indigenous Peoples of the World.
  2. Wikipedia | Right of Self Determination.
  3. Wikipedia | Discovery doctrine; Special thanks to Stephen Newcomb for his monumental research on the Doctrine of Discovery, the papal decree by Pope Nicholas V sourced in part from an essay, A Matter of Religious Freedom and Five Hundred Years of Injustice by Steven Newcomb | Philharmonie PDF | Apolegetica Historia Sumaria by Bartolome de Las Casa (1530)—a conquistador who repented his actions against indigenous people who became a Jesuit priest; Indigenous Law Institute
  4.  Ibid; Pagans and the Promised Land (2008) by Stephen Newcomb | Amazon | We the People of the Dominated Native Nationscommentary on assimilating native people into We the American Peopleby Stephen Newcomb.
  5. Wikipedia | John Marshall quote from an essay, A Matter of Religious Freedom and Five Hundred Years of Injustice by Steven Newcomb.
  6. Wikipedia | City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197 (2005) held that repurchase of traditional tribal lands 200 years later did not restore tribal sovereignty to that land. 
  7. Wikipedia | Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of N.Y., 470 U.S. 226, 234 (1985)(Oneida II) and Oneida Indian Nation of N. Y. v. County of Oneida, 414 U. S. 661, 667 (1974) (Oneida I).
  8. Indian Country Today | See also: Birgil Kills Straight by Maria Braveheart Jordan commentary on intergenerational trauma and native suicides; Indian Country Today | Quote from an Open Letter to Pope John Paul II.
  9. Wikipedia | Crazy Horse; Wikipedia | Crazy Horse Memorial; This author remembers being the last free Indian Crazy Horse in another lifetime.
  10. Wikipedia | Onondaga People are one of the original five nations of the Iroquois. The Cayuga and Seneca have territory to their east and the Oneida and Mohawk to their east. The Haudenosaunee Councils have remained sovereign; Onondaga Nation
  11. Cornell Law | 25 USC §1302 – Constitutional rights.
  12. An “allodial” title is a sovereign title with no superior claim to such land.
  13. Counterpunch | Open Letter to the Pope to repudiate the Doctrine of Discovery by Deacon Joe Beasley; HuffPost | Nuns Blast Catholic Church’s Doctrine of Discovery That Justified Indigenous Oppression; Amah Mutsun | Religious Society of Friends Letter to Pope Francis Re: The Doctrine of Christian Discovery; Fountain of Light | Refute the Doctrine of Christian Discovery.
  14. Wikipedia | UN calls for mechanism to investigate historical land claims.
  15. National Catholic Reporter | Doctrine of Discovery: A scandal in plain sight.
  16. Wikipedia | Indian Gaming Act of 1988;  300 tribes in 27 states.
  17. Defrauding America by Rodney Stitch (1994), p.389.
  18. Wikipedia | Haida People; The Dominion | The Struggle for Haida Gwaii; Haida Nation | Constitution of the Haida Nation.
  19. Wikipedia | Unrecognized tribes in the Unites States; Wikipedia | List of historical unrecognized states and dependencies; UNPO | InfoPlease | Indigenous People of the World | Unrecognized Nations: Travels to Countries That Do Not Exist; Amazon
  20. Wikipedia | Quote sources from 1491: New Revelations Before Columbus, p.10; Amazon

Source: Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty (30th Anniversary Edition), Volume 1 of 3, p.76-81

ORDER YOUR LIBERTY BOOKS TODAY!

Sovereign’s Handbook by Johnny Liberty 
(30th Anniversary Edition)
(3-Volume Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

A three-volume, 750+ page tome with an extensive update of the renowned underground classic ~ the Global Sovereign’s Handbook. Still after all these years, this is the most comprehensive book on sovereignty, economics, law, power structures and history ever written. Served as the primary research behind the best-selling Global One Audio Course.Available Now!

$99.95 ~ THREE-VOLUME PRINT SERIES
$33.33 ~ THREE-VOLUME EBOOK

Dawning of the Corona Age: Navigating the Pandemic by Johnny Freedom 
(3rd Edition)
(Printed, Bound Book or PDF)

This comprehensive book, goes far beyond the immediate impact of the “pandemic”, but, along with the reader, imagines how our human world may be altered, both positively and negatively, long into an uncertain future. Available Now!

$25.00 ~ PRINT BOOK
$10.00 ~ EBOOK